Guide to the secondary literature in German and English in chronological order.
The compilation includes important articles and books on the works of Jürgen Habermas. It also includes many reviews of Habermas's books.
It is based on the bibliographies, which I have published in various forms at my website www.habermasforum.dk since 2004.
I wish to acknowledge helpful inputs from:
Works which only contain minor references to Habermas are not included.
The bibliography is available as a PDF file.
1992
Adam, Armin – “Abgründe der Begründung. Jürgen Habermas über Demokratie und Moral” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], Süddeutsche Zeitung, 11-12-1992.
Alexy, Robert – “A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason”, Ratio Juris, vol. 5, no. 3 (1992), 231-251. Repr. in Robert Alexy, Law’s Ideal Dimension (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021), pp. 255-274. German: “Eine diskurstheoretische Konzeption der praktischen Vernunft”, in Robert Alexy & Ralf Dreier (eds.), Rechtssystem und praktische Vernunft (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1993), pp. 11-29 [Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft 51].
Antczak, Frederick J. & Warren Sandmann – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 78, no. 4 (1992), pp. 510-511.
Antonio, Robert J. & Douglas Kellner – “Communication, Modernity, and Democracy in Habermas and Dewey”, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 15, no. 3 (1992), pp. 277-297.
Apel, Karl-Otto – “Illokutionäre Bedeutung und normative Gültigkeit: Die transzendentalpragmatische Begründung der uneingeschränkten kommunikativen Verständigung”, ProtoSoziologie, vol. 2 (1992), pp. 2-15. Repr. in Gerhard Preyer, Maria Ulkan & Alexander Ulfig (eds.), Intention – Bedeutung - Kommunikation. Kognitive und handlungstheoretische Grundlagen der Sprachtheorie (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997), pp. 288-303.
Arens, Edmund – Christopraxis. Grundzüge theologischer Handlungstheorie (Freiburg: Herder Verlag, 1992). English: Christopraxis. A Theology of Action (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995).
Arens, Edmund – “Diskursethik, ein Spiel für Philosophen der ersten Welt?”, in Raúl Fornet-Betancourt (ed.), Diskursethik oder Befreiungsethik? (Aachen: Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung, 1992), pp. 55-69.
Back, Kurt W. – “The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2, 1992, pp. 257-258.
Baker, Keith Michael – “Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France: Variations on a Theme by Habermas”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 181-210.
Baldamus, W. – “Understanding Habermas's Method of Reasoning”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2 (1992), pp. 97-115.
Baynes, Kenneth – The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism. Kant, Rawls, Habermas (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992).
Belgrad, Jürgen – Identität als Spiel. Eine Kritik des Identitätskonzepts von Jürgen Habermas (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1992).
Bell, David A. – “The "Public Sphere", the State, and the World of Law in Eighteenth-Century France”, French Historical Studies, vol. 17, no. 4 (1992), pp. 912-934.
Bernstein, Richard J. – “An Allegory of Modernity/Postmodernity: Habermas and Derrida”, in Richard J. Bernstein, The New Constellation. The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge Mas.: Polity Press, 1992, pp. 199-229. Repr. in Lasse Thomassen (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 71-97.
Bernstein, Richard J. – “The Resurgence of Pragmatism”, Social Research, vol. 59, no. 4 (1992), pp. 813-840.
Blake, Nigel – “Modernity and the Problem of Cultural Pluralism”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol. 26, no. 1 (1992), pp. 39-50.
Boyte, Harry C. – “The Pragmatic Ends of Popular Politics”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 340-357.
Braaten, Jane – Jürgen Habermas (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992).
Browning, Don S. & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza – (ed.) Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992).
|
Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology
|
Burkart, Roland & Alfred Lang – “Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas - Eine kommentierte Textcollage”, in Roland Burkart & Walter Hömberg (eds.), Kommunikationstheorien. Ein Textbuch zur Einführung (Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1992), pp. 40-68.
Calhoun, Craig – (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).
|
Habermas and the Public Sphere
|
Calhoun, Craig – “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 1-48. Abridged version in Joyce Appleby et al., Knowledge and Postmodernism in Historical Perspective (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 509-519, and in Peter Beilharz (ed.), Postwar American Critical Thought, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2006), pp. 3-39.
Campbell, Richard – “Truth as a Social Construct”, in Richard Campbell, Truth and Historicity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 322-354.
Candelaria, Michael – “The Dialectics of Transcendental and Universal Pragmatics. A Marxist and Ethnic-Existential Critique”, in Raúl Fornet-Betancourt (ed.), Diskursethik oder Befreiungsethik? (Aachen: Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung, 1992), pp. 83-95.
Cascardi, Anthony J. – The Subject of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Cheal, David – “Ritual: Communication in Action”, Sociological Analysis, vol. 53, no. 4 (1992), pp. 363-374.
Clayton, Philip – “Eine Fallstudie sozialwissenschaftlicher Rationalität: Die kommunikative Rationalität von Jürgen Habermas”, in Philip Clayton, Rationalität und Religion. Erklärung in Naturwissenschaft und Theologie (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1992), pp. 88-101.
Cobben, Paul – “Habermas' universales, moralisches Bewußtsein im Lichte der Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts”, in Heinz Kimmerle & Wolfgang Lefevre (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch 1992 (Bochum: Germinal, 1992), pp. 329-333.
Cohen, Jean L. & Andrew Arato – “Discourse Ethics and Civil Society”, in Jean L. Cohen & Andrew Arato, Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 345-420.
Cohen, Jean L. & Andrew Arato – “The Historicist Critique: Carl Schmitt, Reinhart Koselleck, and Jürgen Habermas”, in Jean L. Cohen & Andrew Arato, Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 201-254.
Coles, Romand – “Communicative Action and Dialogical Ethics: Habermas and Foucault”, Polity, vol. 25, no. 1 (1992), pp. 71-94.
Connor, Steven – “The Ethics of Discourse: Habermas, Lyotard and Rorty”, in Steven Connor, Theory and Cultural Value (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), pp. 102-132.
Cooke, Maeve – “Habermas, Autonomy and the Identity of the Self”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, no. 3/4 (1992), pp. 269-291.
Coole, Diana – “Modernity and its Other(s): Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity; et al.” [Book review], History of the Human Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3 (1992), pp. 81-91.
Crook, Stephen – “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol. 28, no. 2 (1992), pp. 257-260.
Dahms, Harry – “Democracy and Post-Enlightenment. Lyotard and Habermas Reappraised”, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 5, no. 3 (1992), pp.473-509.
Dais, Eugene E. – “Universal justice and discourse ethics. Habermas's "Kantian mistake"”, in Werner Maihofer & Gerhard Sprenger, Praktische Vernunft und Theorien der Gerechtigkeit. 15. Weltkongress der Internationalen Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Göttingen, 18. bis 24. August 1991, vol. 2 (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1992), pp. 124-139.
Davis, Charkes – “Pluralism, Privacy, and the Interior Self”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 152-172.
Deetz, Stanley A. – “Systematically Distorted Communication and Discursive Closure”, in Stanley A. Deetz, Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992), pp. 173-198. Repr. in Robert T. Craig & Heidi L. Muller (eds.), Theorizing Communication. Readings Across Traditions (Los Angeles: Sage, 2007), pp. 457-472.
Deflem, Mathieu – “Jürgen Habermas: Pflegevater oder Sorgenkind der abolitionistischen Perspektive”, Kriminologisches Journal, vol. 24, no. 2 (1992), pp. 82-97.
Dews, Peter – “Postscript to the Introduction”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas (London: Verso, 1992; revised edition), pp. 33-42.
Döbert, Rainer – “Konsensustheorie als deutsche Ideologie”, in Hans-Joachim Giegel (ed.), Kommunikation und Konsens in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992), pp. 276-309.
Eastby, John H. - “Habermas on the New Conservatism” [Book review], History of European Ideas, vol. 14, no. 5 (1992), pp. 729-733.
Eckersley, Robyn – “The Failed Promise of Critical Theory” in Robyn Eckersley, Environmentalism and Political Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992), pp. 97-118.
Eley, Geoff – “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth-Century”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 289-339. Repr. in Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley & Sherry B. Ortner (eds.), Culture/Power/History. A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 297-335, and in Geoff Eley, History Made Conscious. Politics of Knowledge, Politics of the Past (London: Verso, 2023), pp. 73-110.
Eley, Geoff – “Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere” [Book review], Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 34, no. 1 (1992), pp. 189-190.
Figal, Günter – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Anton Hügli & Poul Lübcke (eds.), Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert vol. I (Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1992), pp. 366-384.
Finlay, Marike & Brian Robertson – “Ideal Speech Situation vs. Particular Pragmatics of Situation: The Microcosm of Psychoanalytic Discourse”, Semiotica, vol. 91, no 3-4 (1992), pp. 199-272.
Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler – “Introduction: A Critical Reception for a Practical Public Theology”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 1-18.
Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler – “The Church as a Community of Interpretation: Political Theology between Discourse Ethics and Hermeneutical Reconstruction”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 66-91.
Fleming, Marie – “Women's Place in Communicative Reason”, in Elizabeth D. Harvey & Kathleen Okruhlik (eds.), Women and Reason (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992), pp. 245-262.
Flynn, Bernard – “Habermas: The Metaphysics of Language”, in Bernard Flynn, Political Philosophy at the Closure of Metaphysics (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1992), pp. 38-78.
Fortin-Melkevik, Anne – “The Reciprocal Exclusiveness of Modernity and Religion among Contemporary Thinkers: Jürgen Habermas and Marcel Gauchet”, in Claude Geffré & Jean-Pierre Jossua (eds.), The Debate on Modernity (London: SCM Press, 1992) [= Concilium, 1992/6], pp. 57-66.
Frank, Arthur W. – “Only by Daylight: Habermas's Postmodern Modernism” [Book review], Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 9, no. 3 (1992), pp. 149-165.
Funk, Nanette – “Jürgen Habermas: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action” [Book review], Socialism and Democracy, vol. 8, no. 1 (1992), pp. 155-158.
Garnham, Nicholas – “The Media and the Public Sphere”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 359-376.
Giegel, Hans-Joachim – “Diskursive Verständigung und systemische Selbststeuerung”, in Hans-Joachim Giegel (ed.), Kommunikation und Konsens in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), pp. 59-112.
Ginev, Dimitri – “Varianten der Kritischen Wissenschaftstheorie”, Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, vol. 23, no. 1 (1992), pp. 45-60.
Goodman, Dena – “Public Sphere and Private Life: Toward a Synthesis of Current Historiographical Approaches to the Old Regime”, History and Theory, vol. 31, no. 1 (1992), pp. 1-20.
Goodnight, G. Thomas – “Habermas, The Public Sphere, and Controversy”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 4, no. 3 (1992), pp. 243-255.
Goodnight, G. Thomas – “The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Argumentation and Advocacy, vol. 28, no. 3 (1992), pp. 145-147.
Gordon, Daniel – “Philosophy, Sociology, and Gender in the Enlightenment Conception of Public Opinion”, French Historical Studies, vol. 17, no. 4 (1992), pp. 882-911.
Gröbl-Steinbach, Evelyn – “Jürgen Habermas: "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns" (1981)”, in [n.a.] (ed.), Interpretationen. Hauptwerke der Philosophie, 20. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1992), pp. 362-396.
Günther, Klaus – “Universalistische Normbegründung und Normanwendung in Recht und Moral”, in M. Herberger et al. (eds.), Generalisierung und Individualisierung im Rechtsdenken (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1992), pp. 36-76. [Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 45]
Gurnah, Admed & Alan Scott – “Jürgen Habermas: universal categories and the primacy of the Occident”, in Admed Gurnah & Alan Scott, The Uncertain Science. Criticism of Sociological Formalism (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 93-130.
Halton, Eugene – “Habermas and Rorty: Between Scylla and Charybdis”, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 15 no. 3 (1992), pp. 333-358.
Hanks, Craig – “Thinking about Democracy and Exclusion: Jürgen Habermas' "Theory of Communicative Action" and Contemporary Politics”, Southwest Philosophy Review, vol. 8, no. 1 (1992), pp. 145-155.
Hayim, Gila – “Naturalism and the Crisis of Rationalism in Habermas”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 18, no. 2 (1992), pp. 187-209.
Hinkle, Gisela – “Habermas, Mead, and Rationality”, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 15, no. 3 (1992), pp. 315-331.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe – “The Public Sphere: Models and Boundaries”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 99-108.
Hohendahl, William Mark – “Translator's Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking. Philosophical Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. vii-xx.
Hoppe, Hansgeorg – “Ethische Positionen im Vergleich: Utilitarismus (Hare) - Vertragstheorie (Rawls) – Diskursethik (Apel/ Habermas)”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 50, no. 2 (1992), pp. 503-512.
Horster, Detlef – “Jürgen Habermas' Rechtsphilosophie”, Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 39, no. 12 (1992), pp. 1138-1141. Repr. in Detlef Horster, Politik als Pflicht. Studien zur politischen Philosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 245-255.
How, Alan R. – “On the Logic of the Social Science, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 23, no. 3, 1992, pp. 294-296.
Iggers, Georg G. – “The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians' Debate, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The American Historical Review, vol. 97, no. 3, 1992, pp. 871-872.
Ingram, David – “Habermas: Enlightenment and the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity”, in Chip Sills & Georg H. Jensen (eds.), The Philosophy of Discourse, vol. II, (London: Heinemann, 1992), pp. 129-154.
Isenberg, Bo – “Habermas on Foucault: Critical Remarks”, Acta sociologica, vol. 35, no. 1 (1992), pp. 299-308.
Janicaud, Dominiqiue – “Rationality, Force and Power: Foucault and Habermas's Criticisms”, in Timothy J. Armstrong (ed.), Michel Foucault: Philosopher. Essays translated from the French and German (New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 283-302.
Joas, Hans – “Die unterschätzte Alternative. Amerika und die Grenzen der "Kritischen Theorie"”, in Hans Joas, Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), pp. 96–113. English: “An Underestimated Alternative: America and the Limits of Critical Theory”, Symbolic Interaction, vol 15 no. 3 (1992), pp. 261-275. Repr. in Hans Joas, Pragmatism and Social Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp. 79-93.
Katzenbach, Dieter – “Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Dieter Katzenbach, Die soziale Konstitution der Vernunft. Erklären, Verstehen und Verständigung bei Piaget, Freud und Habermas (Heidelberg: Asanger, 1992), pp. 98-111.
Kellner, Douglas – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas; The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historian's Debate, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Contemporary Sociology, vol. 21, no. 2 (1992), pp. 278-279.
Kempkes, Helge L. – “Universalistische Rechtfertigung der Pädagogik und die Theorie Habermas'”, Pädagogische Rundschau, vol. 46, no. 3 (1992), pp. 283-296.
Kirsch, Werner – “Perspektiven der Theorien des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Werner Kirsch, Kommunikatives Handeln, Autopoiese, Rationalität. Sondierungen zu einer evolutionären Führungslehre (München: Kirsch, 1992), pp. 31-184.
Kögler, Hans-Herbert – “Moralische und methodologische Anerkennung des Andern”, in Hans-Herbert Kögler, Die Macht des Dialogs. Kritische Hermeneutik nach Gadamer, Foucault und Rorty (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1992), pp. 120-133. English: “Ethical and Methodological Recognition of the Other”, in Hans-Herbert Kögler, The Power of Dialogue. Critical Hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 141-157.
Kolb, David – “Heidegger and Habermas on Criticism and Totality”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol 52, no. 3 (1992), pp. 683-693.
Kopperschmidt, Josef – “Argumentation als Sprachspiel der Vernunft. Oder: Ein Versuch, J. Habermas' "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns" argumentationstheoretisch zu beerben”, in Ulrich Püschel & Barbara Sandig (eds.), Stilistik III: Argumentationsstile (Marburg: Olms, 1992), pp. 13-44. [ = Germanistische Linguistik, vol. 112/113.]
Köveker, Dietmar – “Zur Kategorisierbarkeit "verdeckt" und "offen strategischen Sprachgebrauchs". Das Parasitismus-Argument von Jürgen Habermas”, Journal of General Philosophy of Science, vol. 23, no. 2 (1992), pp. 289-311.
Kramer, Lloyd – “Habermas, History, and Critical Theory”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.) – Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 236-258.
Krawitz, Rudi – “Das Individuum als "kommunikative Rationalität" in der pädagogischen Relation der "Lebenswelt" bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Rudi Krawitz, Pädagogik statt Therapie. Vom Sinn individualpädagogischen Sehens, Denkens und Handelns (Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 1992), pp. 206-219.
Krüger, Hans-Peter – “Wissenschaftsspezifische Geltungsansprüche kommunikationsorientiert betrachtet”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 40, no. 11 (1992), pp. 1259-1278.
Krusekamp, Harald – “Das Verhältnis von Mythos und Rationalität im Werk von Jürgen Habermas”, in Harold Krusekamp, Archäologen der Moderne. Zum Verhältnis von Mythos und Rationalität in der Kritischen Theorie (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1992), pp. 123-198.
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang – “Sprachphilosophie: Die transzendentalpragmatische Position”, in Marcelo Dascal et al. (eds.), Sprachphilosophie. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 1. Halbband (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992), pp. 746-760. Repr. as “Transzendentalpragmatische Sprachphilosophie”, in Wolfgang Kuhlmann, Sprachphilosophie - Hermeneutik - Ethik (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1992), pp. 9-36.
La Vopa, Anthony J. – “Conceiving a Public: Ideas and Society in Eighteenth-Century Europe” [Book review], The Journal of Modern History, vol. 64, no. 1 (1992), pp. 79-116.
Landes, Joan – “Jürgen Habermas' "The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere": A Feminist Inquiry”, Praxis International, vol. 12, no. 1 (1992), pp. 106-127. Revised version: “Rethinking Habermas's Public Sphere”, Political Theory Newsletter, vol. 4, no. 1 (1992), pp. 51–69. Repr. as “The Public and the Private Sphere: A Feminist Reconsideration”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 91-116, and in Joan B. Landes (ed.), Feminism, the Public and the Private (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 135-163.
Lee, Benjamin – “Textuality, Mediation and Public Discourse”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 402-418.
Lehmann, Jennifer M. & Willis G. Regier – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative action” [Book review], Sociological Inquiry, vol. 62, no. 3 (1992), pp 383-386.
Link, Thomas – “Natur und Emanzipation: Die kritische Theorie von J. Habermas”, in Thomas Link, Mensch und Natur: zum Begriff der Natur in den sozialwissenschaftlichen Theorien der Gegenwart (Köln: Böhlau, 1992), pp. 126-149.
Makkreel, Rudolf A. – “Purposiveness in History: Its Status after Kant, Hegel, Dilthey and Habermas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, nos. 3-4 (1992), pp. 221-234. German: “Zweckmässigkeit in der Geschichte. Ihr Status bei Kant, Hegel, Dilthey und Habermas”, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, vol. 39 (1996), pp. 255-267.
Marsh, James L. – “Truth and Power”, in Raúl Fornet-Betancourt (ed.), Diskursethik oder Befreiungsethik? (Aachen: Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung, 1992), pp. 166-180.
Martin, Bill – “What is at the Heart of Language? Habermas, Davidson, Derrida”, in Bill Martin, Matrix and the Line. Derrida and the Possibility of Postmodern Social Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992), pp. 65-124.
Mazumbar, Shaswati – “Habermas and the Post-Modernist Critique of the Enlightenment”, Social Scientist, vol. 20, no. 12 (1992), pp. 53-66.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Practical Discourse and the Relation Between Morality and Politics”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 51-72. Repr. in Revue Internationale de Philosphie, vol. 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 461-481, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 353-369.
Mirchandani, Rekha – “Habermas, Discourse Ethics, and Assuring the Moral Point of View”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 12 (1992), pp. 231-249.
Moritz, Peter – Kritik des Paradigmenwechsels. Mit Horkheimer gegen Habermas (Lüneburg: zu Kampen, 1992).
Müller, Peter – “Kommunikative Ethik”, in Annemarie Pieper (ed.), Geschichte der neueren Ethik, Band 2 (Tübingen: Francke, 1992), pp. 235-259.
Mumby, Dennis – “Two Discourses on Communication, Power and the Subject: Jürgen Habermas and Michel Foucault”, in George Levine (ed.), Constructions of the Self (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1992), pp. 81-104.
Neumann, Walter G. – Praxiskritik: J. Habermas' "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Haag und Herchen, 1992).
Nielsen, Kai – “On the Status of Critical Theory”, Interchange vol. 23, no. 3 (1992), pp. 265-284.
Nissen, Kerstin – “Die Theorie des verständigungsorientierten kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, in Wolfgang Luutz (ed.), Gesellschaftliche Reproduktion und soziale Kommunikation (Hamburg: Argument, 1992), pp. 43-50.
Nuyen, A. J. – “Habermas, Adorno and the Possibility of Immanent Critique”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 66, no. 3 (1992), pp. 331-340.
Pabst, Karl H. – “Jürgen Habermas' transzendentale Grundlegung kritischer Theorie”, in Karl H. Pabst, Transzendentale Erkenntnis und Gesellschaft. Zur Kritik transzendentaler Begründungsversuche der Gesellschaftstheorie bei Max Adler, Jürgen Habermas und Theodor W. Adorno (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1992), pp. 135-203.
Parsons, Stephen D. – “Explaining Technology and Society. The Problem of Nature in Habermas”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2 (1992), pp. 218-230.
Pecora, Vincent P. – “Habermas, Enlightenment, and Antisemitism”, in Saul Friedlander (ed.), Probing the Limits of Representation. Nazism and the "Final Solution" (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 155-184.
Peter, Gerd – “System und Lebenswelt: Zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas", in Gerd Peter, Theorie der Arbeitsforschung. Situation, Institution, System als Grundkategorien empirischer Sozialwissenschaft (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 1992), pp. 92-138.
Peukert, Helge – “J. Habermas' Parsonsinterpretation”, in Helge Peukert, Parsons / Pareto / Habermas. Eine Studie zur soziologischen Theoriediskussion (Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner, 1992), pp. 71-101.
Poster, Mark – “Postmodernity and the Politics of Multiculturalism: The Lyotard-Habermas Debate over Social Theory”, Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 37, no. 3 (1992), pp. 567-580. Repr. in Jean-Joseph Goux & Philip R. Wood (eds.), Terror and Consensus. Vicissitudes of French Thought (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), pp. 104-118.
Postone, Moishe – “Political Theory and Historical Analysis”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 164-177.
Prado, Plinio – “Argumentation and Aesthetics: Reflections on Communication and the Differend”, Philosophy Today, vol. 36, no. 4 (1992), pp. 351-366.
Preyer, Gerhard – “Jürgen Habermas: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik” [Book review], Berliner Journal für Soziologie, vol. 2, no. 1 (1992), pp. 241-243.
Raffel, Stanley – Habermas, Lyotard and the Concept of Justice (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992).
Rasmussen, Douglas B. – “Political Legitimacy and Discourse Ethics”, International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 32 (1992), pp. 17-34.
Reese-Schäfer, Walter – “Die Frankfurt-Bielefeld-Differenz. Habermas contra Luhmann”, in Walter Reese-Schäfer, Niklas Luhmann zur Einführung (Hamburg: Julius, 1992), pp. 139-152.
Reijen, Willem van – “Moderne versus postmoderne politische Philosophie. Ein Vergleich zwischen Habermas und Loytard”, in Reinhard Hörster, Winfried Marotzki & Heinz Sünker (eds.), Kritische Erziehungswissenschaft - Moderne – Postmoderne (Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag, 1992), pp. 9-33.
Roberts, Julian – “Dialogue and History: Jürgen Habermas and the Erlangen School”, in Julian Roberts, The Logic of Reflection. German Philosophy in the Twentieth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), pp. 218-280.
Rosenthal, John – “What is Life? A Habermas Critique”, Social Science Information, vol. 31 no.1 (1992), pp. 5-42.
Rotter, Frank – “Kritische Theorie und Feminismus”, in Ilona Ostner & Klaus Lichtblau (eds.), Feministische Vernunftkritik (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1992), pp. 66-87.
Ryan, Mary P. – “Gender and Public Access: Women's Politics in Nineteenth-Century America”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 259-288.
Ryan, Michael – “From Derrida to Habermas and Beyond, via Lacan”, in Michael Ryan, Marxism and Deconstruction (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1992), pp. 103-116.
Schaefer, Alfred – “Jürgen Habermas: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik” [Book review], Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, vol. 45, no. 4 (1992), pp. 327-329.
Schudson, Michael – “Was There Ever a Public Sphere? If So, When? The Reflections on the American Case”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 143-163.
Schüssler, Francis Fiorenza – “Introduction: A Critical Reception for a Practical Public Theology”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 1-18.
Schüssler, Francis Fiorenza – “The Church as a Community of Interpretation: Political Theology between Discourse Ethics and Hermeneutical Reconstruction”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 66-91.
Sciulli, David – “Habermas, Critical Theory, and the Relativistic Predicament”, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 15 no. 3 (1992), pp. 299-313.
Shalin, Dmitri N. – “Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 98 no. 2 (1992), pp. 237-279.
Shalin, Dmitri N. – “Introduction: Habermas, Pragmatism, Interactionism”, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 15 no. 3 (1992), pp. 251-259.
Sieb, Ludwig – “Mit Radikalen vernünftig reden?“ [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], Der Spiegel, no. 43/1992, pp. 292-298.
Simon, Dieter – “Die Einheit des Rechts in der Vielheit der Systeme” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 08-12-1992.
Simpson, Gary M. – “"Theologia Crucis" and the Forensically Fraught World: Engaging Helmut Peukert and Jürgen Habermas”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 173-205.
Sintomer, Yves – “Power and Civil Society: Foucault vs Habermas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, no. 3/4 (1992), pp. 357-378.
Smith, Jeremy – “Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere” [Book review], Thesis Eleven, no. 31 (1992), pp. 182-187.
Smith, Nick – “The Spirit of Modernity and its Fate: Jürgen Habermas”, Radical Philosophy, no. 60 (1992), pp. 23-29.
Spahr, Angela – “Amphibolie der Kommunikationsbegriffe. Zur Hegelrezeption in Jürgen Habermas' Ethik”, in Heinz Kimmerle & Wolfgang Lefevre (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch 1992 (Bochum: Germinal, 1992), pp. 335-341.
Steele, Meili – “The Ontological Turn and Its Ethical Consequences: Habermas and the Poststructuralists”, Praxis International, vol. 11, no. 4 (1992), pp. 428-447.
Steuerman, Emilia – “Habermas vs. Lyotard: Modernity vs. Postmodernity”, in Andrew Benjamin (ed.), Judging Lyotard (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 99-118.
Strydom, Piet – “The Ontogenetic Fallacy: The Immanent Critique of Habermas' Developmental Logical Theory of Evolution”, Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 9, no. 3 (1992), pp. 65-93. Repr. in Piet Strydom, New Horizons of Critical Theory. Collective Learning and Triple Contingency (New Delhi: Shipra, 2009).
Teubner, Gunther – “De collisione discursuum. Jürgen Habermas' rechtstheoretische Schrift "Faktizität und Geltung"” [Book review], Frankfurter Rundschau 11-11-1992.
Thomassen, Niels – “Communicative Power”, in Niels Thomassen, Communicative Ethics in Theory and Practice (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992), pp. 81-118.
Tietz, Udo – “Transzendentale Argumente versus Conceptual Scheme: Bemerkungen zum Begründungsstreit zwischen Universalismus und Kontextualismus”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 40, no. 8 (1992), pp. 916-936. Repr. in Udo Tietz, Sprache und Verstehen in analytischer und hermeneutischer Sicht (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 251-274.
Tönnies, Sibylle – “Die Linken verlassen die sinkenden Massen. Jürgen Habermas und die Asylfrage”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23-12-1992.
Tracy, David – “Theology, Critical Social Theory, and the Public Realm”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 19-42. Repr. in David Tracy, Fragments. The Existential Situation of Our Time (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2019), pp. 241-268.
Trey, George – “Communicative Ethics in the Face of Alterity: Habermas, Levinas and the Problem of Post-Conventional Universalism”, Praxis International, vol. 11, no. 4 (1992), pp. 412-427.
Villa, Dana R. – “Postmodernism and the Public Sphere”, The American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 2 (1992), pp. 712-721.
Visker, Rudi – “Habermas on Heidegger and Foucault. Meaning and Validity in "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity"”, Radical Philosophy, no. 61 (1992), pp. 15-22. Repr. in J. Bernstein (ed.), The Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, vol. VI (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 334-348. Also as “Meaning and Validity: Habermas on Heidegger and Foucault”, in Rudi Visker, Truth and Singularity. Taking Foucault into Phenomenology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 73-90.
Walker, Brian – “Habermas and Pluralist Political Theory”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, no. 2 (1992), pp. 81-102.
Warner, Michael – “The Mass Public and the Mass Subject”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 377-401.
Weberman, David – “Jürgen Habermas, "Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action"” [Book review], The Philosophical Review, vol. 101, no. 4 (1992), pp. 924-926.
Wehling, Peter – “Aporien in Habermas' Krisentheorie der Moderne”, in Peter Wehling, Die Moderne als Sozialmythos. Zur Kritik sozialwissenschaftlicher Modernisierungstheorien (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1992), pp. 340-367.
Wellmer, Albrecht – “Konsens als Telos der sprachlichen Kommunikation?”, in Hans-Joachim Giegel (ed.), Kommunikation und Konsens in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992), pp. 18-30. Repr. in Albrecht Wellmer, Wie Worte Sinn machen. Aufsätze zur Sprachphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 61-73.
Whitton, Brian J. – “Universal Pragmatics and the Formation of Western Civilization. A Critique of Habermas's Theory of Human Moral Evolution”, History and Theory, vol. 31 no. 3 (1992), pp. 299-313.
Widdenhoven, Guy A. M. – “Hermeneutics and Relativism. Wittgenstein, Gadamer, Habermas”, Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, vol. 12, no. 1 (1992), pp. 1-11.
Williams, Howard & Jon Fearon-Jones – “Jürgen Habermas and Neo-Marxism”, in Leonard J. Tivey & Anthony Wright (eds.), Political Thoughts since 1945 (London: Edward Elgar, 1992), pp. 115-133.
Wischke, Mirko – “Jürgen Habermas, Texte und Kontexte; Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik; Vergangenheit als Zukunft” [Book review], Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 40, no. 5 (1992), pp. 591-594.
Wischke, Mirko – “Jürgen Habermas: Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik” [Book review], Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, vol. 46, no. 3 (1992), pp. 456-458.
Wuthnow, Robert – “Rationality and the Limits of Rational Theory: A Sociological Critique”, in Don S. Browning & Francis Schüssler Fiorenza (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology (New York: Crossroad, 1992), pp. 206-225.
Young, Robert – Critical Theory and Classroom Talk (Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1992).
Zaret, David – “Religion, Science, and Printing in the Public Spheres in Seventeenth-Century England”, in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 212-235.
Žižek, Slavoj – “Lacan versus Habermas”, in Slavoj Žižek, Enjoy Your Symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out (London: Routledge, 1992), pp, 118-122. German: “Lacan versus Habermas”, in Slavoj Žižek, Grimassen des Realen. Jacques Lacan oder die Monstrosität des Aktes (Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1993), pp. 119-124.
1993
Adriaanse, H.J. – “Aufklärung und die Idee des Unendlichen”, in Harry Kunneman & Hent de Vries (eds.), Enlightenments. Encounters Between Critical Theory and Contemporary French Thought (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993), pp. 286-304.
Albert, Hans – “Dialektische Denkwege. Jürgen Habermas und der kritische Rationalismus”, in Hans Albert & Kurt Salamun (eds.), Mensch und Gesellschaft aus der Sicht des kritischen Rationalismus (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993), pp.11-40. Revised versions: “Ein hermeneutischer Rückfall. Jürgen Habermas und der kritische Rationalismus”, Logos, vol. 1 (1993/94), pp. 3–34, and “Ein hermeneutischer Rückfall. Jürgen Habermas und der kritische Rationalismus”, in Hans Albert, Kritik der reinen Hermeneutik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1994), pp. 230-262.
Alejandro, Roberto – “Communication and Public Sphere: The Case of Habermas”, in Roberto Alejandro, Hermeneutics, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 179-204.
Angehrn, Emil – “Das unvollendete Projekt der Demokratie” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], Philosophische Rundschau, vol. 40, no. 4 (1993), pp. 257-264.
Aragaki, Hiro – “Communicative Ethics and the Morality of Discourse”, Praxis International, vol. 13, no. 2 (1993) pp. 154-171.
Arato, Andrew – “Interpreting 1989”, Social Research, vol. 60, no. 3 (1993), pp. 609-646. Repr. in Andrew Arato, Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy (Lanham: Rowland & Littlefield, 2000), pp. 1-41.
Bader, Veit-Michael – “Viel Geltung und immer weniger Faktizität. Zur Kritik an Jürgen Habermas' diskurstheoretischer Rechts- und Demokratietheorie”, in Heiner Ganßmann & Stephan Krüger (eds.), Produktion - Klassentheorie (Hamburg: VSA-Verlag, 1993), pp. 50-78.
Baltas, Aristides – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Philosophy of Science, vol. 60, no. 3 (1993), pp. 521-523.
Becker, Jörg – “Communication Research in Germany” [Book review; Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit; Neuauflage 1990], European Journal of Communication, vol. 8, no. 2 (1993), pp. 257-269. [Habermas, pp. 261-263]
Benhabib, Seyla – “Demokratie und Differenz. Betrachtungen über Rationalität, Demokratie und Postmoderne”, in Micha Brumlik & Hauke Brunkhorst (eds.), Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1993), pp. 97-116. Revised version: “Zur Epistemologie und Politik der Differenz. Demokratiekonzeptionen im Gefolge der Postmoderne”, in Christoph Menke & Martin Seel (eds.), Zur Verteidigung der Vernunft gegen ihre Liebhaber und Verächter (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 243-267. English: Revised and expanded version: “Democracy and Difference: Reflections on the Metapolitics of Lyotard and Derrida”, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 2, no. 1 (1994), pp. 1-23. Repr. in Lasse Thomassen (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 128-156.
Bogen, David – “Order Without Rules: Wittgenstein and the "Communicative Ethics Controversy"”, Sociological Theory, vol.11, no. 1 (1993), pp. 55-71. Revised version: “Order Without Rules”, in David Bogen, Order Without Rules. Critical Theory and the Logic of Conversation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999), pp. 121-140.
Bohman, James – “The Completeness of Macro-Sociological Explanations: System and Lifeworld”, ProtoSociology, vol. 5 (1993), pp. 103-113. Repr. in Gerhard Preyer, Georg Peter & Alexander Ulfig (eds.), Protosoziologie im Kontext. "Lebenswelt" und "System" in Philosophie und Soziologie (Würzburg: Könighausen & Neumann, 1996), pp. 370-381.
Bolz, Norbert – “Der Mythos des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Norbert Bolz, Am Ende der Gutenberg-Galaxis. Die neuen Kommunikationsverhältnisse (München: Fink, 1993), pp. 59-79.
Brodsky, Garry M. – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99, no. 2 (1993), pp. 508-510.
Burkart, Roland – “Verständigungorientierte Öffentlichkeitsarbeit - Ein Transformationsversuch der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Günter Bentele & Manfred Rühl (eds.), Theorien öffentlicher Kommunikation (München: Ölschläger, 1993), pp. 218-227.
Campbell, Richard – “Reconceiving Truth and Reason”, in Dieter Freundlieb & Wayne Hudson (eds.), Reason and Its Other. Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and Culture (Providence: Berg, 1993), pp. 132-161.
Cohen, Sande – “Habermas' Bureaucratization of the Final Solution”, in Sande Cohen, Academia and the Luster of Capital (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), pp. 63-80.
Cooke, Maeve – “Habermas and Consensus”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 3 (1993), pp. 247-267.
Cooke, Maeve – “Habermas, Autonomy, and the Identity of the Self”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, nos. 2-4 (1993), pp. 269-291. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 29-47.
Cooper, David E. – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 173 (1993), pp. 572-574.
Cortés Rodas, Francisco Luis – Praktische Philosophie und Theorie der Gesellschaft. Zur Kritik und Rekonstruktion einer emanzipatorischen Gesellschafts- und Moraltheorie bei Habermas (Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 1993).
Cortina, Adela – “Diskursethik und partizipatorische Demokratie”, in Andreas Dorschel et al. (eds.), Transzendentalpragmatik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 238-256.
Couture, Tony – “Habermas, Values, and the Rational, Internal Structure of Communication”, Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 27, no. 3-4 (1993), pp. 403-416. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 226-238.
Cronin, Ciaran P. – “Translator's Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993), pp. xi-xxxi.
Cushman, Donald P. – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Communication Theory, vol. 3, no. 2 (1993), pp. 176-178.
Cutrofello Andrew – “Speculative Logic, Deconstruction, and Discourse Ethics”, Philosophical Forum, vol. 24, no. 4 (1993), pp. 319-330.
Dews, Peter – “Agreeing What's Right” [Book review], London Review of Books, vol. 15, no. 9 (13-05-1993), pp. 25-26. Repr. in Jay M. Bernstein (ed.), The Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, vol. VI (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 309-315, and as “Facticity, Validity, and the Public Sphere”, in Peter Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 194-201. German: “Faktizität, Geltung und Öffentlichkeit”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 2 (1993), pp. 359-364.
Dietz, Simone – Lebenswelt und System. Widerstreitende Ansätze in der Gesellschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas (Würzburg: Könighausen und Neumann, 1993).
Dunne, Joseph – “The Challenge of Critical Theory”, in Joseph Dunne, Back to the Rough Ground: Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993), pp. 168-226.
Dussel, Enrique – “Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures)”, Boundary 2, vol. 20, no. 3 (1993), 65-76.
Esser, Hartmut – Die Verrechtlichung der Lebenswelt und kommunikative Durchdringung der Systemwelt: Jürgen Habermas”, in Hartmut Esser, Soziologie (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1993), pp. 127-178.
Fairfield, Paul – “Habermas, Kohlberg, and the Myth of Expertise”, Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1-2 (1993), pp. 77-91.
Farrell, Thomas B. – “Universal Pragmatics and Practical Reason: From Deformation to Reformation”, in Thomas B. Farrell, Norms of Rhetorical Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), pp. 187-229.
Feldman, Stephen M. – “The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional Jurisprudence: Michelman, Habermas, and Civic Republicanism”, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 81, no. 6 (1993), pp. 2243-2290.
Fink-Eitel, Hinrich – “Innerweltliche Transzendenz. Zum gegenwärtigen Stand kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie”, Merkur, no. 528 (March 1993), pp. 237-245.
Fischer, Karsten – “Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Jahrbuch Extremismus & Demokratie, vol. 5. (1993), pp. 345-346.
Frank, Manfred – “Wider den apriorischen Intersubjektivismus. Einwände aus Sartrescher Inspiration”, in Micha Brumlik & Hauke Brunkhorst (ed.), Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1993), pp. 273-289. English: “Against a priori Intersubjectivism: An Alternative Inspired by Sartre”, in Dieter Freundlieb, Wayne Hudson & John Rundell (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas. Encounters and Departures (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2004), pp. 259-279.
Fleming, Marie – “Women and the "Public Use of Reason"”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 19, no. 1 (1993), pp. 27-50. Repr. in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas. Gendering the Subject of Discourse (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 117-137.
Forget, Philippe – “Interkulturalität und Monokultur: Zu Habermas‘ Kritik an Derrida (II)”, in Bernd Thum & Gonthier-Louis Fink (eds.), Praxis interkultureller Germanistik. Forschung - Bildung – Politik (München: Iudicium, 1993), pp. 745-760.
Freitag, Barbara – “Theoretischer und praktischer Diskurs: die Habermas-Rezeption in Brasilien”, in Günther Ammon & Theo Eberhard (eds), Kultur, Identität, Kommunikation: 2. Versuch (München: Eberhard, 1993), pp. 295-316.
Freundlieb, Dieter & Wayne Hudson – “Reason and Ist Other: Some Major Themes”, in Dieter Freundlieb & Wayne Hudson (ed.), Reason and Its Other. Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and Culture (Providence: Berg, 1993), pp. 1-22.
Frey, Bruno & Gerhard Kirschgässner – “Diskursethik, Politische Ökonomie und Volksabstimmungen”, Analyse & Kritik, vol. 15, no. 2 (1993), pp. 129-149.
Fusfield, William D. – “Some Psedoscientific Features of Transcendental-pragmatic Grounding Projects”, in Hans Albert & Kurt Salamun (eds.), Mensch und Gesellschaft aus der Sicht des kritischen Rationalismus (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993), pp. 41-68.
Gebauer, Richard – Letzte Begründung. Eine Kritik der Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas (München: Wilhelm Fink, 1993).
Gephart, Werner – “Die Verrechtlichung der Lebenswelt und die kommunikative Durchdringung der Systemwelt: Jürgen Habermas”, in Werner Gephart, Gesellschaftstheorie und Recht. Das Recht im soziologischen Diskurs der Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 127-178.
Germain, Gilbert G. – A Discourse on Disenchantment. Reflections on Politics and Technology (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).
Gilroy, Paul – “Masters, Mistresses, Slaves, and the Antinomies of Modernity”, in Paul Gilroy, The Black Atlantic. Modernity and Double Consciousness (London: Verso, 1993), pp. 41-71.
Gröbl-Steinbach, Evelyn – “Jenseits von Gesellschaftskritik: Zur (Un)Möglichkeit Kritischer Theorie im kommunikationstheoretischen Paradigma”, in Andreas Balog & Johann August Schülein (eds.), Soziologie und Gesellschaftskritik. Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Normativität und sozialwissenschaftlicher Analyse (Wien: VWGÖ, 1993), pp. 111-126. [Gießen: Focus Verlag, 1995]
Gronke, Horst – “Apel versus Habermas”, in Andreas Dorschel et al. (eds.), Transzendentalpragmatik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 273-296.
Günther, Klaus – “Differenzierungen im Begriff der praktischen Vernunft. Zu Jürgen Habermas' "Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik"”, ProtoSociology, vol. 4 (1993), pp. 184-190.
Habermeier, Rainer – “Die Marxismus-Kritik des frühen Habermas”, Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies, vol. 25, no. 2 (1993), pp. 135-152.
Hansen, Miriam – “Foreword”, in Oskar Negt & Alexander Kluge, Public Sphere and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), pp. ix-xli.
Hilgendorf, Eric – “Rechtsphilosophie im vereinigten Deutschland. Einige Anmerkungen zu neueren Arbeiten” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung et.al.], Philosophische Rundschau, vol. 40, no. 1 (1993), pp. 1-33 [on Habermas, pp. 11-14]
Holub, Robert C. – “The Enlightenment of the Dialectic: Jurgen Habermas's Critique of the Frankfurt School”, in W. Daniel Wilson & Robert C. Holub (eds.), Impure Reason. Dialectic of Enlightenment in Germany (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1993), pp. 34-47.
Holz, Klaus – Historisierung des Gesellschaftstheorie. Zur Erkenntniskritik marxistischer und kritischer Theorie (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus, 1993).
Höffe, Otfried – “Eine Konversion der kritischen Theorie? Zu Habermas' Rechts- und Staatstheorie” [Book review], Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 27-02-1993. Repr. as “Eine Konversion der Kritischen Theorie (Habermas)”, in Otfried Höffe, Vernunft und Recht. Bausteine zu einem interkulturellen Rechtsdiskurs (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 146-152. An expanded version in Rechtshistorisches Journal, vol. 12 (1993), pp. 70-88. English: Revised version: “Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Mind, vol. 109, no. 435 (2000), pp. 608-614. Also published as “Between Facts and Norms” in part 4 of “Habermas and the Conversion of Critical Theory”, in Otfried Höffe, Categorical Principles of Law. A Counterpoint to Modernity (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2002), pp. 249-287 [pp. 276-283].
Horster, Detlef – “Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol 79, no. 4 (1993), pp. 588-591.
Horster, Detlef – “Jürgen Habermas, Texte und Kontexte” [Book review], Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol 79, no. 2 (1993), pp. 285-288.
Hudson, Wayne – “Habermas's "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity"”, in Dieter Freundlieb & Wayne Hudson (eds.), Reason and Its Other. Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and Culture (Providence: Berg, 1993), pp. 107-131.
Ingram, David – “The Limits and Possibilities of Communicative Ethics for Democratic Theory”, in Political Theory, vol. 21, no. 2 (1993), pp. 294-321. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 289-313, and in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. III (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 139-163.
Johnson, James – “Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation Between Critical Theory and Rational Choice”, American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 1 (1993), pp. 74-86.
Kempkes, Helge L. – “Anschlußstellen für eine gesellschaftstheoretische Betrachtung von Weiterbildung in der Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, in Helge L. Kempkes, Auf den Grenzen von Systemen und Alltagswelt. Gesellschaftstheoretische Zugänge zu einer Theorie der Weiterbildung (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993), pp. 25-125.
Kettner, Matthias – “Scientific Knowledge, Discourse Ethics and Consensus Formation in the Public Domain”, in Jerrold R. Coombs & Earl Winkler (eds.), Applied Ethics. A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 28-45.
Keuth, Herbert – Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung. Zur Kritik der kritischen Theorie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1993).
Kim, Seong-Jae – “Methodologische Überlegung: Dialektik und Hermeneutik”, in Seong-Jae Kim, Mode und Gegenmode. Sozialwissenschaftliche Ansätze zu einer Kommunikationstheorie der Öffentlichkeit (Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1993), pp. 21-92.
Kingwell, Mark – “Interpretation, Dialogue and the Just Citizen”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 19, no. 2 (1993), pp. 115-144. Repr. in Mark Kingwell, A Civil Tongue. Justice, Dialogue, and the Politics of Pluralism (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), pp. 3-24.
Kissling, Christian – Gemeinwohl und Gerechtigkeit. Ein Vergleich von traditioneller Naturrechtsethik und kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie (Freiburg: Herder Verlag, 1993).
Knapp, Markus – “Jürgen Habermas: Die Moderne als unvollendetes Projekt”, in Markus Knapp, Gottes Herrschaft als Zukunft der Welt. Biblische, theologiegeschichtliche und systematische Studien zur Grundlegung einer Reich-Gottes-Theologie in Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Würzburg: Echter, 1993), pp. 501-582.
Koch, Martina – “Rekonstruktion und kritische Reflexion. Die Abgrenzung ästhetischer und theoretischer Rationalität”, in Martina Koch, Die Konstellation der Rationalitäten im interrationalen Bildungsprozess. J. Habermas, D. Kamper und M. Seel im fiktiven Gespräch über eine Bildinterpretation von K. Mollenhauer (Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag, 1993), pp. 68-100.
König, Peter-Paul – “Kommunikation und Strategie. Anmerkungen zur Unterscheidung zwischen kommunikativem und strategischem Handeln bei Jürgen Habermas”, ProtoSociology, vol. 4 (1993), pp. 53-62. Repr. in Gerhard Preyer, Maria Ulkan & Alexander Ulfig (eds.), Intention – Bedeutung – Kommunikation. Kognitive und handlungstheoretische Grundlagen der Sprachtheorie (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997), pp. 304-320.
Koivisto, Juha & Esa Väliverronen – “Das Comeback kritischer Theorien der Öffentlichkeit”, Das Argument no. 201 (1993), pp. 717-732. English: “The Resurgence of the Critical Theories of Public Sphere”, Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 2 (1996), pp. 18-37.
Kompridis, Nikolas – “Über Welterschließung: Heidegger, Habermas, Dewey”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 3 (1993), pp. 525-538. English: “On World Disclosure: Heidegger, Habermas and Dewey”, Thesis Eleven, no. 37 (1994), pp. 29-45.
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang – “Bemerkungen zum Problem der Letztbegründung”, in Andreas Dorschel et al. (eds.), Transzendentalpragmatik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 212-237. Repr. in Wolfgang Kuhlmann, Unhintergehbarkeit. Studien zur Transzendentalpragmatik (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2010), pp. 97-116.
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang – “Habermas und das Problem der Letztbegründung”, ProtoSociology, vol. 4 (1993), pp. 179-183.
Kujundzic, Nebojsa & William Buschert – “Staging the Life-World: Habermas and the Recuperation of Austin's Speech Act Theory”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 23, no. 1 (1993), pp. 105-116.
Kunneman, Harry – “Stretching Habermas”, in Harry Kunneman & Hent de Vries (eds.), Enlightenments. Encounters Between Critical Theory and Contemporary French Thought (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993), pp. 77-91.
Lang, Alfred – “Jürgen Habermas' Verständigungsparadigma als theoretischer und forschungsleitender Rahmen in der Kommunikationswissenschaft”, in Günter Bentele & Manfred Rühl (eds.), Theorien öffentlicher Kommunikation (München: Ölschläger, 1993), pp. 214-218.
Larmore, Charles – “Die Wunzeln radikaler Demokratie”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 2 (1993), pp. 321-327. English: Revised version: “The Foundations of Modern Democracy: Reflections on Jürgen Habermas”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 1 (1995), pp. 55-68. Repr. in James P. Sterba (ed.), Justice. Alternative Political Perspectives (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1999, 3rd ed.), pp. 188-196, and in Charles Larmore, The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 205-221.
Leilich, Joachim – “Die unbeantwortete Frage. Bemerkungen zur Kontroverse zwischen Karl-Otto Apel, Jürgen Habermas und John R. Searle”, in Andreas Dorschel et al. (eds.), Transzendentalpragmatik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 45-61.
Leilich, Joachim – “Intentionality, Speech Acts and Communicative Action: A Defense of J. Habermas' & K. O. Apel's Criticism of Searle”, Pragmatics, vol. 3, no. 2 (1993), pp. 155-170.
Lob-Hüdepohl, Andreas – "Handlungsorientierung in kommunikativer Praxis. Kommunikative Rationalität als Moralprinzip, ihre reflexive Rekonstruktion und die umfassende Humanitätsverpflichtung kommunikativer Ethik", in Andreas Lob-Hüdepohl, Kommunikative Vernunft und theologische Ethik (Freiburg, Schweiz: Herder, 1993), pp. 193-272.
Lüderssen, Klaus – “Wer einigt sich mit wem? Die Bedeutung des Diskurses für das Recht”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 05-05-1993.
Lüderssen, Klaus – “Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Juristen Zeitung, vol. 48, no. 9 (1993), pp. 458-460.
Luhmann, Niklas – “"Quod omnes tangit". Anmerkungen zur Rechtstheorie von Jürgen Habermas”, Rechtshistorisches Journal, vol. 12 (1993), pp. 36-56. English: “"Quod omnes tangit". Remarks on Jürgen Habermas's Legal Theory”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 883-899. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 157-172 and in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Avebury: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 81-97.
Manning, Nicholas – “T.H. Marshall, Jürgen Habermas, Citizenship and Transition in Eastern Europe”, World Development, vol 21, no. 8 (1993), pp. 1313-1328.
Marsh, James – “The Religious Significance of Habermas”, Faith and Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 4 (1993), pp. 521-538.
Matuštík, Martin J. – “Identity in Communicative Ethics“, in Martin J. Matuštík, Postnational Identity. Critical Theory and Existential Philosophy in Habermas, Kierkegaard, and Havel (New York: Guilford Press, 1993), pp. 3-104.
Matuštík, Martin J. – “Post-National Identity: Habermas, Kierkegaard and Havel”, Thesis Eleven, no. 34 (1993), pp. 89-103.
McLuskie, Ed – “Against Transformations of Communication into Control: Continuities in the Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas” [Review Essay; The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, On the Logic of the Social Sciences et al.], Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 1 (1993), pp. 154-165.
Mehring, Reinhard – “Jürgen Habemas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, vol. 46, no. 2 (1993), pp. 177-188.
Merkel, Reinhard – “Was ist das Recht? Jürgen Habermas: "Faktizität und Geltung"” [Book review], Die Zeit 12-02-1993.
Meyer, Ulrike – “Habermas und die Grenzen der Ethik” [Book review], Neue politische Literatur, vol. 38, no. 2 (1993), pp. 276-277.
Meyer, William J. – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Journal of Religion, vol. 73, no. 4 (1993), pp. 646-647.
Morton, Michael – “Precritical and Critical: Fish and Habermas”, in Michael Morton, The Critical Turn (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1993), pp. 70-115.
Mulder, Walter De – “Intentionality and Meaning”, Pragmatics, vol. 3, no. 2 (1993), pp. 171-180.
Müller, Jörg Paul – “Zentrale Anliegen der Diskursethik (Jürgen Habermas, Karl-Otto Apel) + Erläuterungen und Fragen zur Diskursethik”, in Jörg Paul Müller, Demokratische Gerechtigkeit. Eine Studie zur Legitimität politischer und rechtlicher Ordnung (München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1993), pp. 56-70 + 71-93.
Nagl, Ludwig – “Habermas and Derrida on Reflexivity”, in Harry Kunneman & Hent de Vries (eds.), Enlightenments. Encounters Between Critical Theory and Contemporary French Thought (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993), pp. 61-76.
Nielsen, Kai – “Skeptical Remarks on the Scope of Philosophy: Rorty vs Habermas”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 19, no. 2 (1993), pp. 117-160. Repr. in Kai Nielsen, Naturalism without Foundations (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1996), pp. 385-417.
O'Neill Onora – “Kommunikative Rationalität und praktische Vernunft”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 2 (1993), pp. 329-332.
Orts, Eric W. – “Positive Law and Systemic Legitimacy: A Comment on Hart and Habermas”, Ratio Juris, vol. 6, no. 3 (1993), pp. 245-278.
Ott, Konrad – “Kritische Theorie und Natur”, in Konrad Ott, Ökologie und Ethik (Tübingen: Attempto, 1993), pp. 89-113.
Peters, John Durham – “Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere”, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 15, no. 4 (1993), pp. 541-571. Repr. in Denis McQuail (ed.), Mass Communication, vol. 1: Theories, Basic Concepts and Varieties of Approach (London: Sage, 2007), pp. 196-225.
Phelan, Shane – “Interpretation & Domination: Adorno & the Habermas-Lyotard Debate”, Polity, vol. 25, no. 4 (1993), pp. 597-616.
Pickard, D. – “Applied Nietzsche: The Problem of Reflexivity in Habermas, a Postmodern Critique”, Auslegung, vol. 19, no. 1 (1993), pp. 1-21.
Postone, Moishe – “Habermas's Critique of Marx”, in Moishe Postone, Time, Labor, and Social Domination. A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 226-259. German: “Habermas' Kritik an Marx”, in Moishe Postone, Zeit, Arbeit und gesellschaftliche Herrschaft. Eine neue Interpretation der kritischen Theorie von Marx (Freiburg: Ça-ira Verlag, 2003), pp. 345-393.
Power, Michael – “Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 23, no. 1 (1993), pp. 26-49. German: “Habermas und das Problem der transzendentalen Argumentation. Ein Neubewertung”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 242-273.
Preyer, Gerhard – “Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 45, no. 2 (1993), pp. 373-376.
Rademacher, Claudia – Versöhnung oder Verständigung? Kritik der Habermasschen Adorno-Revision (Lüneburg: zu Klampen, 1993).
Rasmussen, David M. – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Philosophical Quarterly, no. 173 [vol. 43] (1993), pp. 571-572.
Ray, Larry J. – Rethinking Critical Theory. Emancipation in the Age of Global Social Movements (London: Sage, 1993). [especially on pp. 19-78]
Renn, Joachim – “Die kommunikative Erschließung der subjektiven Welt. Die existentielle Genese als dialogische Reflexion expressiver Sprechakte”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 3 (1993), pp. 539-561.
Rescher Nicholas – Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).
Robinson, Paul – “The Hermeneutic Freud”, in Paul Robinson, Freud and His Critics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 180-194.
Rolshausen, Claus – “Die Traditionalisierung der Kritischen Theorie”, in Diethard Behrens (ed.), Gesellschaft und Erkenntnis. Zur materialistischen Erkenntnis- und Ökonomiekritik (Freiburg: Ça Ira, 1993), pp. 39-58.
Scheuerman, Bill – “Neumann versus Habermas. The Frankfurt School and the Case of the Rule of Law”, Praxis International, no. 13, no. 1 (1993), pp. 50-67. Repr. in William E. Scheuerman, Frankfurt School Perspectives on Globalization, Democracy, and the Law (New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 69-85.
Schiller, Hans-Ernst – “Zurück zu Marx mit Habermas. Eine Aktualisierung”, in Hans-Ernst Schiller, An unsichtbarer Kette. Stationen Kritischer Theorie (Lüneburg: zu Klampen, 1993), pp. 152-175.
Schlink, Bernhard – “Abenddämmerung oder Morgendämmerung? Zu Jürgen Habermas' Diskurstheorie des demokratischen Rechtsstaats”, Rechtshistorisches Journal, vol. 12 (1993), pp. 57-69.
Scott, Alan – “Jürgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action” [Book review], History of the Human Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4 (1993), pp. 129-131.
Seel, Martin – “Über Richtigkeit und Wahrheit. Erläuterungen zum Begriff der Welterschliessung”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 3 (1993), pp. 509-524. English: “On Rightness and Truth: Reflections On the Concept of World Disclosure”, Thesis Eleven no. 37 (1994), pp. 64-81.
Senn, Marcel – “Spinoza und die Diskursethik”, Studia Spinozana, vol. 9 (1993), pp. 297- 331. Repr. in Marcel Senn, Rechtsphilosophisches und rechtshistorisches Selbstverständnis im Wandel (Zürich: Dike, 2016), pp. 327-358.
Shelly, Robert – “Habermas and the Normative Foundations of a Radical Politics”, Thesis Eleven, no. 35 (1993), pp. 62-83.
Skirbekk, Gunnar – Rationality and Modernity. Essays in Philosophical Pragmatics (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1993).
Somek, Alexander – “Unbestimmtheit: Habermas und die Critical Legal Studies. Einige Bemerkungen über die Funktion von Rechtsparadigmen für die Rechtsanwendung im demokratischen Rechtsstaat”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 2 (1993), pp. 343-357.
Stein, Andrew – “The Use and Abuse of History: Habermas' MisReading of Bataille”, Symploke, vol. 1, no. 1 (1993), pp. 21-58.
Stevenson, N. – “Habermas, Mass Culture and the Future of the Public Sphere”, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. 38 (1993), pp. 221-245.
Strydom, Piet – “Sociocultural Evolution or the Social Evolution of Practical Reason. Eder's Critique of Habermas”, Praxis International, vol. 13, no. 3 (1993), pp. 304-322. Repr. in Piet Strydom, New Horizons of Critical Theory. Collective Learning and Triple Contingency (New Delhi: Shipra, 2009), pp. 40-56.
Teusch, Ulrich – “Technikkritik oder Kapitalismuskritik? Jürgen Habermas und die "Technokratische Hintergrundideologie"”, in Ulrich Teusch, Freiheit und Sachzwang. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Technik, Gesellschaft und Politik (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1993), pp. 185-214.
Thiebaut, Carlos – “The Complexity oft he Subject, Narrative Identity and the Modernity of the South”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 18, nos. 3-4 (1993), pp. 313-332. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. 4 (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 13-28.
Thompson, John B. – “The Theory of the Public Sphere” [Book review; The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere], Theory, Culture & Society vol. 10, no. 3 (1993), pp. 173-189.
Tietz, Udo – “Faktizität, Geltung und Demokratie: Bemerkungen zu Habermas' Diskurstheorie der Wahrheit und der Normenbegründung”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 2 (1993), pp. 333-342.
Tönnies, Sibylle – “Habermas, Jürgen: Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Rechtstheorie, vol. 24, no. 3 (1993), pp. 386-392.
Trabant, Jürgen – “Habermas liest Humboldt”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 4 (1993), pp. 639-652.
Treibel, Annette – “Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (Habermas, Offe)”, in Annette Treibel, Einführung in soziologische Theorien der Gegenwart (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1993), pp. 45-65.
Treibel, Annette – “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Habermas II)”, in Annette Treibel, Einführung in soziologische Theorien der Gegenwart (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1993), pp. 153-178.
Tucker, K. H. – “Aesthetics, Play, and Cultural Memory: Giddens and Habermas on the Postmodern Challenge”, Sociological Theory, vol. 11, no. 2 (1993), pp. 194-211. Repr. in Christopher G.A. Bryant & David Jary (eds.), Anthony Giddens. Critical Assessments, vol. 4 (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 61-84.
Wagner, Gerhard – “Weber und Habermas”, in Gerhard Wagner, Gesellschaftstheorie als politische Theologie? Zur Kritik und Überwindung der Theorien normativer Integration (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1993), pp. 234-307.
Warnke, Georgia – “Ocularcentrism and Social Criticism”, in David Michael Levin (ed.), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 287-308.
Warren, Mark E. – “Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimensions of Habermas's Discursive Model of Democracy”, Political Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2 (1993), pp. 209-234. Expanded version: “The Self in Discursive Democracy”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167-200.
Webler, Thomas – “Habermas Put into Practice: A Democratic Discourse for Environmental Problem Solving?”, in Jonathan Taylor, Thomas Dietz, Linda Kalof (eds.), Human Ecology. Crossing Boundaries (Bar Harbor: Society for Human Ecology, 1993), pp. 60-72.
Weiss, Hilde – “Fortführung der Kritischen Theorie: Habermas”, in Hilde Weiss, Soziologische Theorien der Gegenwart. Darstellung der großen Paradigmen (Wien: Springer, 1993), pp. 188-202.
Wellmer, Albrecht - “Truth, Contingency and Modernity”, Modern Philology, vol. 90, no. S1: May 1993 Supplement (1993), pp. 109-124. Repr. in Albrecht Wellmer, Endgames. Essays and Lectures on the Irreconcilable (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 137-154. German: “Wahrheit, Kontingenz, Moderne”, in Harry Kunneman & Hent de Vries (eds.), Enlightenments. Encounters Between Critical Theory and Contemporary French Thought (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993), pp. 25-44, and in Albrecht Wellmer, Endspiele. Die unversöhnliche Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 157-177.
Wetzel, Manfred – “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Habermas' "Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik" unter Bezugnahme auf Otfried Höffes Schriften zur Ethik und Politik”, ProtoSociology, no. 4 (1993), pp. 191-195.
Wingert, Lutz – “Der moralische Standpunkt”, in Lutz Wingert, Gemeinsinn und Moral. Grundzüge einer intersubjektivistischen Moralkonzeption (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 179-208.
Yoo, Joo-Hyun – Diskursive Praxis diesseits von Letztbegründung und Positivität. Zur Kritik des Diskursbegriffes bei Jürgen Habermas und Michel Foucault (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1993).
Zurbrugg, Nicholas – “Pure "H" - Habermas and Communicative Rationality”, in Nicholas Zurbrugg, The Parameters of Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 57-60.
1994
Abraham, David – “Persistent Facts and Compelling Norms: Liberal Capitalism, Democratic Socialism, and the Law” [Review Essay: Comment], Law & Society Review, vol. 28, no. 4 (1994), pp. 939-946.
Ajzner, Jan – “Some Problems of Rationality, Understanding, and Universalistic Ethics in the Context of Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4 (1994), pp. 466-484.
Alario, Margarita – “Environmental Destruction and the Public Sphere: On Habermas’s Discursive Model and Political Ecology”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 20, no. 3 (1994), pp. 327-341.
Alexy, Robert – “Basic Rights and Democracy in Jürgen Habermas's Procedural Paradigm of the Law”, Ratio Juris, vol. 7 no. 2 (1994), pp. 227-238. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 391-402, and in Hugh Baxter (ed.), Habermas and Law (New York: Routledge, 2017), pp. 59-70. German: “Grundrechte und Demokratie in Jürgen Habermas' prozeduralem Rechtsparadigma”, in Okko Behrends & Ralf Dreier (eds.), Gerechtigkeit und Geschichte (Göttingen: Wallstein, 1996), pp. 78-89.
Andersen, Heine – “Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Acta Sociologica, vol. 37, no. 1 (1994), pp. 93-99.
Apel, Karl-Otto – “Das Problem des offenen strategischen Sprachgebrauchs in transzendentalpragmatischer Sicht. Ein zweiter Versuch, mit Habermas gegen Habermas zu denken”, in Holger Burckhart (ed.), Diskurs über Sprache (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1994), pp. 31-52. Repr. in Karl-Otto Apel, Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 701-725. English: “Openly Strategical Use of Language: A Transzendental-Pragmatic Perspective (A Second Attempt to Think with Habermas against Habermas)”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 272-290.
Apel, Karl-Otto – “Ist die transzendentalpragmatische Konzeption der Diskursrationalität eine Unterbestimmung der Vernunft?”, in Petra Kolmer & Harald Korten (eds.), Grenzbestimmungen der Vernunft (Freiburg: Alber, 1994), pp. 77-101.
Aronowitz, Stanley – “The Power of Positive Thinking: Jürgen Habermas in America”, in Stanley Aronowitz, Dead Artists, Live Theories, and Other Cultural Problems (New York: Routledge, 1994), pp. 242-253.
Aune, James Arnt – “Rhetoric Between System and Lifeworld. A Reconstruction of Habermas's Historical Materialism”, in James Arnt Aune, Rhetoric and Marxism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 117-142.
Bal, Peter – “Discourse Ethics and Human Rights in Criminal Procedure”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 71-100. Repr. in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 71-99.
Barnett, Stuart – “Resisting Subjects: Habermas on the Subject of Foucault”, in Arleen B. Dallery & Stephen H. Watson (eds.), Transitions in Continental Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), pp. 43-58.
Baum, Achim – Journalistisches Handeln. Eine kommunikationstheoretisch begründete Kritik der Journalismusforschung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994).
Baynes, Kenneth – “Communicative Ethics, The Public Sphere, and Communication Media”, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, vol. 11, no. 4 (1994), pp. 315-326.
Becker, Hartmuth – Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei Carl Schmitt und Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994).
Benhabib, Seyla – “Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy”, Constellations, vol. 1, no. 1 (1994), pp. 26-52. Revised version: “Toward A Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy”, in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 67-94. Repr. in Fred D'Agostino & Gerald F. Gaus (eds.), Public Reason (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 97-124, and in James P. Sterba (ed.), Justice. Alternative Political Perspectives (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1999, 3rd ed.), pp. 197-211. German: “Ein deliberatives Modell demokratischer Legitimation”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 43, no. 1 (1995) pp. 3-29.
Bertilsson, Margareta – “Faktizität und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des Demokratischen Rechtstaats, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Contemporary Sociology, vol. 23, no. 1 (1994), pp. 156-159.
Blanke, Thomas – “Zu Jürgen Habermas "Faktizität und Geltung"”, Kritische Justiz, vol. 27, no. 4 (1994), pp. 439-461.
Blankenburg, Erhard – “Diskurs oder Autopoiesis: Lassen sich Rechtstheorien operationalisieren?”, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, vol. 15, no. 2, 1994), pp. 115-125.
Blaug, Ricardo – “Habermas's Treatment for Relativism”, Politics, vol. 14, no. 2 (1994), pp. 51-57.
Blyler, Nancy Roundy – “Habermas, Empowerment, and Professional Discourse”, Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 3, no. 2 (1994), pp. 125-145.
Bohman, James – “Complexity, Pluralism, and the Constitutional State. On Habermas's "Faktizität und Geltung"”, Law and Society Review, vol. 28, no. 4 (1994) pp. 897-930.
Bronner, Stephen Eric – “Jürgen Habermas and the Language of Politics”, in Stephen Eric Bronner, Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 283-320.
Burrell, Gibson – “Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis 4: The Contribution of Jürgen Habermas”, Organization Studies, vol. 15, no. 1 (1994), pp. 1-19.
Casebeer, Kenneth – “Paris is Closer than Frankfurt: The nth American Exceptionalism” [Review Essay: Comment], Law & Society Review, vol. 38, no. 4 (1994), pp. 931-937.
Cohen, Jean – “Jean Cohen Responds”, New German Critique, no. 62 (1994), pp. 137-148.
Cooke, Maeve – Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas's Pragmatics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994).
Cooke, Maeve – “Realizing the Post-Conventional Self”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 1-2 (1994), pp. 87-101. German: Revised version: “Postkonventionelle Selbstverwirklichung: Überlegungen zur praktischen Subjektivität”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 1 (1994), pp. 61-72.
Critchley, Simon – “Habermas und Derrida werden verheiratet”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 6 (1994), pp. 1025-1036. English: “Habermas and Derrida Get Married”, in Simon Critchley, The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas (2nd edition: Edinburgh: Edinbugh University Press, 1999), pp. 267-280.
Dahms, Hans-Joachim – “Die Zweite Runde des Positivismusstreits”, in Hans-Joachim Dahms, Positivismusstreit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994), pp. 361-400.
Davis, Felmon John – “Discourse Ethics and Ethical Realism”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 2, no. 2 (1994), pp. 125-142. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 271-288.
Dean, Mitchell – “Habermas' Modernist Translations”, in Mitchell Dean, Critical and Effective Histories. Foucault's Method and Historical Sociology (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 120-140.
Deflem, Mathieu – “Habermas, Modernity and Law: A Bibliography”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 151-166. Repr. in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 151-169.
Deflem, Mathieu – “Introduction: Law in Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action”, in Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 1-20. Repr. in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 1-20, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 199-214.
Deflem, Mathieu – “Social Control and the Theory of Communicative Action”, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, vol. 22, no. 4 (1994), pp. 355-373.
Demmerling, Christoph – “Vom "Bewusstsein" zur "Kommunikation". Jürgen Habermas und der Paradigmenwechsel in der Sozialphilosophie”, in Christoph Demmerling, Sprache und Verdinglichung. Wittgenstein, Adorno und das Projekt einer kritischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994), pp. 78-116.
Dews, Peter – “Lebenswelt, Metaphysik und Naturethik bei Habermas”, in Wolfgang Zierhofer & Dieter Steiner (eds.), Vernunft angesichts der Umweltzerstörung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994), pp. 103-116. English: “Lifeworld, Metaphysics and the Ethics of Nature in Habermas”, in Peter Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 151-168.
Diggins, John Patrick – “In Defence of the Enlightenment: Jürgen Habermas and the Promise of "Communicative Action"”, in John Patrick Diggins, The Promise of Pragmatism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp. 417-423.
Dreier, Ralf – “Rechtsphilosophie und Diskurstheorie. Bemerkungen zu Habermas' "Faktizität und Geltung"”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 48, no. 1 (1994), pp. 90-103.
Eastland, Lynette Seccombe – “Habermas, Emancipation, and Relationship Change: An Exploration of Recovery Processes as a Model for Social Transformation”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 22, no. 2 (1994), pp. 162-176.
Eckersley, Robyn – “Wo bleibt die Emanzipation der Natur? Habermas' kritischer Theorie aus ökozentrischer Sicht”, in Wolfgang Zierhofer & Dieter Steiner (eds.), Vernunft angesichts der Umweltzerstörung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994), pp. 119-160.
Eder, Klaus – “Jürgen Habermas zum 65. Geburtstag”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 46, no. 3 (1994), pp. 559-562.
Elliott, Anthony – “Jürgen Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking” [Book review], Radical Philosophy, no. 66 (1994), pp. 51-53.
Fairfield, Paul – “Habermas, Lyotard and Political Discourse”, Reason Papers, vol. 19 (1994), pp. 58-80.
Fairlamb, Horace L. – “Habermas' Neo-formalism: Theory as Praxis”, in Horace L. Fairlamb, Critical Conditions. Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 204-232.
Fallschessel, Helmut – “Habermas, Jürgen: "Faktizität und Geltung"” [Book review], Das Argument, no. 206 (1994), pp. 819-826.
Feenberg, Andrew – “The Technocracy Thesis Revisited: Adorno, Foucault, Habermas”, in Andrew Feenberg, Alternative Modernity. The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp. 75-95.
Fjelstad, Per – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 80, no. 4 (1994), pp. 500-503.
Forst, Rainer – Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit. Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994). English: Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).
Gamwell, Franklin I. – “Metaphysics and the Rationalization of Society”, Process Studies, vol. 23, no. 3-4 (1994), pp. 219-237.
Gebauer, Richard – “Jürgen Habermas und das Prinzip des zu vermeidenden performativen Widerspruchs”, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 19, no. 2 (1994), pp. 23-40.
George, Jim – “Critical Social Theory: Thinking Beyond the "Orthodox Consensus"”, in Jim George, Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994), pp. 139-169.
Grondin, Jean – “Die Rationalisierung der Lebenswelt bei Habermas”, in Jean Grondin, Der Sinn für Hermeneutik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1994), pp. 103-121.
Guibentif, Pierre – “Approaching the Production of Law through Habermas's Concept of Communicative Action”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 45-70. Repr. in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 45-70.
Gunnarsson, Logi – “Diskurs ohne Konsens”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 2 (1994), pp. 313-326.
Gunnemann, Jon P. – “Habermas and MacIntyre on Moral Learning”, The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics, vol. 14 (1994), pp. 83-108.
Günther, Klaus – “Diskurstheorie des Rechts oder Naturrecht in diskurstheoretischem Gewand”, Kritische Justiz, vol 27 no. 4 (1994), pp. 470-487.
Hall, David L. – “Philosophy Without Irony: Jürgen Habermas”, in David L. Hall, Richard Rorty: Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), pp. 146-153.
Harrison, Paul R. & Thea Bellou – “John Rawls, Political Liberalism; Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung; et al.” [Book review], Thesis Eleven, no. 39 (1994), pp. 121-128.
Harvey, David – “Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics; Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Sociological Inquiry, vol. 64, no. 3 (1994), pp. 360-363.
Hauser, Gerard A. – “The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 27, no. 1 (1994), pp. 70-76.
Hohendahl, Peter – “Foreword”, in Jürgen Habermas, The Past as Future (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994), pp. vii-xxvi.
Hollinger, Robert – “The Challenge from Critical Theory”, in Robert Hollinger, Postmodernism and the Social Sciences (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994), pp. 153-168.
Holub, Robert C. – “Habermas Among the Americans: Modernity, Ethics, and the Public Sphere”, German Politics & Society, no. 33 (1994), pp. 1-22.
Holzer, Horst – “Medien, Lebenswelt, System”, in Horst Holzer, Medienkommunikation. Einführung in handlungs- und gesellschaftstheoretische Konzeptionen (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994), pp. 89-130.
Honneth, Axel – “Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Habermas und die ethische Herausforderung der Postmoderne”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 2 (1994), pp. 195-220. Repr. in Peter Fischer (ed.), Freiheit oder Gerechtigkeit. Perspektiven Politischer Philosophie (Leipzig: Reclam, 1995), pp. 194-240. Also in Axel Honneth, Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 133-170, entitled “Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Habermas und die Herausforderung der poststrukturalistischen Ethik”. English: “The Other of Justice: Habermas and the Ethical Challenge of Postmodernism”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 289-324, in B.N. Ray (ed.), Contemporary Political Thinking (New Delhi: Kanishka, 2000), pp. 383-422, in Axel Honneth, Disrespect. The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007), pp. 99-128, and in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 133-167.
Honneth, Axel – “Die soziale Dynamik von Mißachtung. Zur Ortsbestimmung einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie”, Leviathan, vol. 22, no. 1 (1994), pp. 78-93. Also in Christoph Görg (ed.), Gesellschaft im Übergang. Perspektiven kritischer Soziologie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1994), pp. 44-62, and in Axel Honneth, Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 88-109. English: “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: On The Location of Critical Theory Today”, Constellations, vol. 1, no. 1 (1994), pp. 255-269. Repr. Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 320-337. Also in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. III (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 19-32, and in Axel Honneth, Disrespect. The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007), pp. 63-79.
Horowitz, Asher – “The Comedy of Enlightenment: Weber, Habermas, and the Critique of Reification”, in Asher Horowitz & Terry Maley (eds.), The Barbarism of Reason. Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994), pp. 195-222.
Hoy, David Couzens & Thomas McCarthy – Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).
Hunter, Ian – “Metaphysics as a Way of Life”, Economy and Society, vol. 23, no. 1 (1994), pp. 93-118.
Ingram, David – “Foucault and Habermas on the Subject of Reason”, in Gary Gutting (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Foucault (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 215-261.
Jang, Chun-Ik – “Versuch einer Neubegründung der kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie”, in Chun-Ik Jang, Selbstreflexiv-selbstbestimmende Subjektivität und durchsichtig-vernünftige Gesellschaft (Bern: Peter Lang, 1994), pp. 193-231.
Jehle, Peter – “Hegemonietheoretische Defizite der Zivilgesellschaftsdebatte. Zur Kritik an Sabine Kebir und der Habermasschule”, Das Argument, no. 206 (1994), pp. 513-527.
Johnson, James [Comment] & Dana R. Villa [Response] – “Public Sphere, Postmodernism and Polemic”, American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2 (1994), pp. 427-433.
Johnson, Pauline – “Feminism and critique: from Marx to Habermas”, in Pauline Johnson, Feminism as Radical Humanism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 89-110.
Kavoulakos, Konstantinus – “The Relationship of Realism and Utopianism in the Theories on Democracy of Habermas and Castoriadis”, Society and Nature, vol. 3, 1994, pp. 69-97.
Kelly, Michael – (ed.) Critique and Power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994).
|
Critique and Power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate
|
Kelly, Michael – “Foucault, Habermas, and the Self-Referentiality of Critique”, in Michael Kelly (ed.), Critique and Power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994), pp. 365-400.
Kieserling, André – “Medien und Gesellschaft: Die Medienkonzepte von Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann”, ProtoSociology, vol. 6 (1994), pp. 329-333.
Kloppenberg, James T. - “Democracy and Disenchantment: From Weber and Dewey to Habermas and Rorty”, in Dorothy Ross (ed.), Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870-1930 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), pp. 69-90. Repr. in James T. Kloppenberg, The Virtues of Liberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 82-99.
Knight, Jack & James Johnson – “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy”, Political Theory, vol. 22, no. 2 (1994), pp. 277-296.
Knodt, Eva – “Toward a Non-Foundationalist Epistemology: The Habermas/Luhmann Controversy Revisited”, New German Critique, no. 61 (1994), pp. 77-100.
Köhler, Michael – “Menschenrecht, Volkssouveränität, internationale Ordnung nach der Diskurslehre vom Recht?”, in Giuseppe Orsi et al. (eds), Nation, Nationalstaat, Nationalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1994), pp. 133-138.
Krüger, Hans-Peter – “Rationaler Pluralismus. Zu Reschers Habermas-Kritik”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 2 (1994), pp. 291-303.
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang – “Die Idee des Diskurses und die Idee der Demokratie. Zu Jürgen Habermas Konzeption deliberativer Politik”, in Holger Burckhart (ed.), Diskurs über Sprache (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1994), pp. 83-102.
Kupka, Thomas – “Jürgen Habermas' diskurstheoretische Reformulierung des klassischen Vernunftsrechts”, Kritische Justiz, vol. 27 no. 4 (1994), pp. 461-469.
Lafont, Cristina – “Spannungen im Wahrheitsbegriff”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 6 (1994), pp. 1007-1024.
Larrain, Jorge – “Habermas and the New Concept of Reason”, in Jorge Larrain, Ideology and Cultural Identity. Modernity and the Third World Presence (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994), pp. 119-140.
Layden, Derek – “Habermas's Lifeworld and System”, in Derek Layden, Understanding Social Theory (London: Sage, 1994), pp. 186-206.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue”, Ethics, vol. 105, no. 1 (1994) pp. 44-63. Repr. in Fred D'Agostino & Gerald F. Gaus (eds.), Public Reason (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 125-144, and in Paul J. Weithman (eds.), The Philosophy of Rawls, vol. 5: Reasonable Pluralism (New York: Garland, 1999), pp. 320-340. German: “Kantianischer Konstruktivismus und Rekonstruktivismus: Rawls und Habermas im Dialog”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 44, no. 6 (1996), pp. 931-950.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions”, Protosoziologie, vol. 6 (1994), pp. 199-228. Repr. in Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1995-96), pp. 1083-1126, and in Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 329-365. Also in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 115-153.
McIntosh, Donald – “Language, Self, and Lifeworld in Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action”, Theory and Society, vol. 23, no. 1 (1994), pp. 1-33. Repr. in Raymond Boudon, Mohamed Cherkaoui & Jeffrey Alexander, The Classical Tradition in Sociology: The European Tradition, vol. IV: European Sociology in the Twentieth Century (London: Sage, 1997), pp. 102-130.
Meadwell, Hudson – “The Foundations of Habermas's Universal Pragmatics”, Theory and Society, vol. 23, no. 5 (1994), pp. 711-727.
Meehan, Johanna – “Autonomy, Recognition and Respect: Habermas, Benjamin, and Honneth”, Constellations, vol. 1, no. 2 (1994), pp. 270-285. Repr. in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Reads Habermas (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 231-246, and in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 337-350.
Meyer, Ulrike (1994), “J. Habermas: Aufklärung, kommunikative Vernunft und moderne Gesellschaft”, in Ulrike Meyer, Soziologie und Aufklärung. Studien zum Selbstverständnis einer Disziplin zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne (Münster: Waxmann, 1994), pp. 157-183.
Miedema, Siebren – “The Relevance for Pedagogy of Habermas' "Theory of Communicative Action"?” Interchange, vol. 25, no. 2 (1994), pp. 195-206.
Mieth, Dietmar – “Theologisch-ethische Überlegungen angesichts der "neuen Unübersichtlichkeit" (J. Habermas)”, in Hans Ulrich Germann-Reber (ed.), Das Ethos der Liberalität (Freiburg, Schweiz: Universitätsverlag, 1994), pp. 157-172.
Misak, Cheryl – “Pragmatism and The Transcendental Turn in Truth and Ethics”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 30, no. 4 (1994), pp. 739-775.
Moggach, Douglas – “Marx and German Idealism: Labour and the Transcendental Synthesis”, History of European Ideas, vol. 19, nos. 1-3 (1994), pp. 137-143.
Morrow, Raymond A. - Critical Theory and Methodology (London: Sage, 1994).
Müller, Harald – “Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln. Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien”, Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, vol. 1, no. 1 (1994), pp. 15-44. English: “International Relations as Communicative Action”, in Karin M. Fierke & Knud Erik Jørgensen (eds.), Constructing International Relations. The Next Generation (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2001), pp. 160-178.
Murphy III, Thomas F. – “Discourse Ethics: Moral Theory or Political Ethic?”, New German Critique, no. 62 (1994), pp. 111-135.
Myerson, George – Rhetoric, Reason and Society: Rationality as Dialogue (London: Sage, 1994).
Nagl, Ludwig – “(How) Can Law Be Legitimated? Habermas, Rawls, Dworkin”, in Herlinde Pauer-Studer (ed.), Norms, Values, and Society (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994), pp. 131-142. German: “(Wie) läßt sich Recht legitimieren? (Habermas, Dworkin, Rawls)”, Ethique et Politique, vol. 16, no. 2 (1995), pp. 145-157.
Nagl, Ludwig – “Das verhüllte Absolute. Religionsphilosophische Motive bei Habermas und Adorno”, Mesotes. Zeitschrift für philosophischen Ost-West-Dialog, vol. 4, no. 2 (1994), pp. 176-193. Repr. in Ludwig Nagl, Das verhüllte Absolute. Essays zur zeitgenössischen Religionsphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2010), pp. 13-38.
Narr, Wolf-Dieter – “Recht - Demokratie - Weltgesellschaft. Überlegungen anläßlich der Rechtstheoretischen Werke von Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann”, Prokla, no. 94 (vol. 24 no. 1, 1994), pp. 87-112.
Narr, Wolf-Dieter – “Recht - Demokratie - Weltgesellschaft. Habermas, Luhmann und das systematische Versäumnis ihrer großen Theorien”, Prokla, no. 95 (vol. 24 no. 2, 1994), 324-344.
Naumann-Beyer, Waltraub – “Annäherung an Derrida oder Wer spät kommt, den belohnt das Lesen”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 1 (1994), pp. 15-33.
Nielsen, Kai – “How to Proceed in Philosophy. Remarks After Habermas”, Thesis Eleven, no. 37 (1994), pp. 10-28. Also in Theoria, vol. 60, no. 2 (1994), pp. 99-128.
Norbrook, David – “"Areopagitica", Censorship, and the Early Modern Public Sphere”, in Richard Burt (ed.), The Administration of Aesthetics. Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994), pp. 3-33.
Norris, Christopher – “Knowledge and Human Interests: Habermas, Lyotard, Foucault”, in Christopher Norris, Truth and the Ethics of Criticism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), pp. 20-36.
Olivier, Bert – “Derrida: Philosophy or Literature?”, Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 10, no. 2 (1994), pp. 151-164.
O'Neill, Onora – “Practical Reason and Possible Community: A Reply to Jean-Marc Ferry”, Ratio Juris, vol. 7, no. 3 (1994), pp. 308-313.
O'Neill, Shane – “Morality, Ethical Life and the Persistence of Universalism” [Book review: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action], Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 11, no. 2 (1994), pp. 129-149.
Outhwaite, William – Habermas: A Critical Introduction (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1994).
Outhwaite, William – “Jürgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action” [Book review], Sociology, vol. 28, no. 1 (1994), pp. 340-342.
Outhwaite, William – “Jürgen Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays” [Book review], Political Studies, vol. 42, no. 4 (1994), p. 765-766.
Outhwaite, William – “Autonomy and Solidary, ed. by Peter Dews; Postmetaphysical Thinking, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Contemporary Sociology, vol. 23, no. 3 (1994), pp. 456-458.
Peters, Bernard – “On Reconstructive Legal and Political Theory”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 101-134. Repr. in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 101-134.
Peters, Michael - “Habermas, Post-Structuralism and the Question of Postmodernity: The Defiant Periphery”, Social Analysis, no. 36 (1994), pp. 3-20. Repr. in Michael Peters et al. (eds.), Critical Theory. Poststructuralism and the Social Context (Palmerston: Dunmore Press, 1996).
Poster, Mark – “Critical Theory and Technoculture: Habermas and Baudrillard”, in Douglas Kellner (ed.), Baudrillard: A Cultural Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 68-88. Repr. in Mark Poster, The Second Media Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995), pp. 95-116.
Preyer, Gerhard – “Die Rationalitätsbegriffe des Handelns. Eine Grundlegung zu einer Typologie sozialen Handelns, Protosoziologie, vol. 6 (1994), pp. 120-150.
Rasmussen, David M. – “How is Valid Law Possible? A Review of "Faktizität und Geltung" by Jürgen Habermas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994), pp. 21-44. Repr. as “How Is Valid Law Possible? A Review of "Between Facts and Norms" by Jürgen Habermas”, in Mathieu Deflem (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 21-44, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 140-160.
Rasmussen, David – “Critical Theory: Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas”, in Richard Kearney (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. VIII: Twentieth Century Continental Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 247-276. Revised version: “Critical Theory and Philosophy” in David M. Rasmussen (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 11-38.
Reese-Schäfer, Walter – Jürgen Habermas (Frankfurt a.M., Campus, 1994.
Reese-Schäfer, Walter – “Sind Hoffnungen auf eine kommunikative Rationalität berechtigt?”, in Wolfgang Zierhofer & Dieter Steiner (eds.), Vernunft angesichts der Umweltszerstörung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994), pp. 69-87.
Rehg, William – Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).
Reichenbach, Roland – “Die Diskurstheorie bei Habermas”, in Roland Reichenbach, Moral, Diskurs und Einigung. Zur Bedeutung von Diskurs und Konsens für das Ethos des Lehrberufs (Bern: Lang, 1994), pp. 67-102.
Rorty, Richard – “Sind Aussagen universelle Geltungsansprüche?”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 6 (1994), pp. 975-988. Expanded version: “Universalität und Wahrheit”, in Richard Rorty, Pragmatismus als Antiautoritarismus (ed. by Eduardo Mendieta) (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2023), pp. 139-207. English: Expanded version: “Universality and Truth”, in Robert B. Brandom, Rorty and His Critics (Malden: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 1-30. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 39-68, and in Richard Rorty, Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2021), pp. 47-83.
Rusconi, Gian Enrico – “Politische Rationalität und Ziviltugend”, in Hans Friedrich Fulda & Rolf-Peter Horstmann (eds.), Vernunftbegriffe in der Moderne. Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongreß 1993 (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994), pp. 653-665.
Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer – “Ein unvollendetes Projekt – oder Muss die Demokratie neu erfunden werden”, Neue Politische Literatur, vol. 39, no. 3 (1994), pp. 363-389 [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung, pp. 381-384].
Schmidt, Thomas M. – “Immanente Transzendenz und der Sinn des Unbedingten. Zur Bestimmung des Verhältnisses von Religion und Philosophie bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Linus Hauser & Eckhard Nordhofen (eds.), Im Netz der Begriffe. Religionspädagogische Analysen (Altenberge: Oros, 1994), pp. 78-96.
Schöllgen, Gregor – “Die Macht der Nation und die Hilflosigkeit deutscher Intellektueller” [Book review; Vergangenheit als Zukunft], Merkur, no. 546/547 (September 1994), pp. 932-937.
Schönberger, Christoph – “Habermas, Jürgen, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Der Staat, vol. 33, no. 1 (1994), p. 124-125.
Schönrich, Gerhard – Bei Gelegenheit Diskurs. Von den Grenzen der Diskursethik und dem Preis der Letztbegründung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994).
Schomberg, René von – “Wertsphären, argumentative Vernunft und die gesellschaftliche Bewältigung von wissenschaftlicher und moralisch-ethischer Unsicherheit”, in Karl-Otto Apel & Matthias Kettner (eds.), Mythos Wertfreiheit? Neue Beiträge zur Objektivität in den Human- und Kulturwissenschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1994), pp. 235-255.
Seidman, Steven – “Between Science and Politics: The Critical Theory of C.W. Mills and Jürgen Habermas”, in Steven Seidman, Contested Knowledge. Social Theory in the Postmodern Era (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 159-193. Repr. in Peter Beilharz (ed.), Postwar American Critical Thought, vol. 2 (London: Sage, 2006), pp. 141-172.
Shapiro, Susan E. – “Rhetoric as Ideology Critique: The Gadamer-Habermas Debate Reinvented”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 62, no. 1 (1994), pp. 123-150.
Sholar, Sylvia E. – “Habermas, Marx and Gramsci: Investigating the Public Sphere in Organizational Communication and Public Relations Courses”, The Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 2 (1994), pp. 77-92.
Simon, Jonathan – “Between Power and Knowledge: Habermas, Foucault, and the Future of Legal Studies”, Law and Society Review, vol. 28, no. 4 (1994) pp. 947-961. Repr. in Roger Cotterrell (ed.), Sociological Perspectives on Law, vol. I (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), pp. 415-430.
Stephens, Mitchell – “The Theologian of Talk: Jürgen Habermas”, Los Angeles Times Magazine, October 23, 1994.
Stevenson, Nick – “Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Sociology, vol. 28, no. 4 (1994), pp. 1010-1011.
Swindal, James – “The Problem of Problematization in Discourse”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 3 (1994), pp. 1-18.
Teepe, Ralf – “Die diskurstheoretische Konzeption von Jürgen Habermas aus Sicht der ökonomischen Theorie”, Homo Oeconomicus, vol. 11 (1994), pp. 211-254.
Theunissen, Michael – “Vernunft, Mythos und Moderne”, in Hans Friedrich Fulda & Rolf-Peter Horstmann (eds.), Vernunftbegriffe in der Moderne. Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongreß 1993 (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994), pp. 31-54.
Tönnies, Sibylle – “Nachmarxistische Metaphysikfurcht bei Habermas und Luhmann”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 25, no. 4 (1994), pp. 525-536.
Treibel, Annette – “Theory of Communication Action, Discourse Ethics and Political Practice: Notes on Recent Development in Habermas”, in Bernhard Schäfers (ed.), Sociology in Germany (Opladen: Leske + Budtich, 1994), pp. 135-148. German: “Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Diskursethik und politische Praxis. Anmerkungen zum neueren Habermas”, in Bernhard Schäfers (ed.), Soziologie in Deutschland (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 133-144.
Tweedy, John & Alan Hunt – “The Future of the Welfare State and Social Rights: Reflections on Habermas”, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 21, no. 3 (1994), pp. 288-316.
Vetlesen, Arne Johan – “Empathy and Solidarity in Habermas's Discourse Theory”, in Arne Johan Vetlesen, Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994), pp. 283-340.
Weinberger, Ota – “Habermas on Democracy and Justice. Limits of a Sound Conception”, Ratio Juris, vol. 7, no. 2 (1994), pp. 239-253. Repr. in Michael Fischer, Peter Koller & Werner Krawietz (eds.), Aus intellektuellem Gewissen. Aufsätze von Ota Weinberger über Grundlagenprobleme der Rechtswissenschaft und Demokratietheorie (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000), pp. 367-380.
Werner, Hans-Joachim – “Martin Buber und Jürgen Habermas”, in Hans-Joachim Werner, Martin Buber (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1994), pp. 170-176.
White, Stephen K. – “Diskursethik, schwere Fürsorge und leichte Fürsorge”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 6 (1994), pp. 1051-1056.
Williams, Howard – “Democracy and Right in Habermas's Theory of Facticity and Value”, History of Political Thought, vol. 15, no. 2 (1994), pp. 269-282. Repr. in Howard Williams, International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 42-56.
Wüstehube, Axel – “"Acquiescence" oder "kommunikative Rationalität". Zu Reschers Kritik an Habermas”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 42, no. 2 (1994), pp. 327-334.
Zierhofer, Wolfgang – “Ist die kommunikative Vernunft der ökologischen Krise gewachsen? Ein Evaluationsversuch”, in Wolfgang Zierhofer & Dieter Steiner (eds.), Vernunft angesichts der Umweltzerstörung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 1994), pp. 161-196.
Žižek, Slavoj – “The Deadlock of "Repressive Desublimation"”, in Slavoj Žižek, The Metastases of Enjoyment. Six Essays on Women and Causality (London: Verso, 1994), pp. 7-28.
1995
Aboulafia, Mitchell – “Habermas and Mead: On Universality and Individuality”, Constellations, vol. 2, no. 1 (1995), pp. 94-113. Repr. in Mitchell Aboulafia, The Cosmopolitan Self. George Herbert Mead and Continental Philosophy (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006), pp. 61-86. German: “Habermas und Mead: Über Universalität und Individualität”, in Axel Honneth & Hans Joas (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas' "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002; expanded edition), pp. 406-432.
Aladjem, Terry K. – “Of Truth and Disagreement: Habermas, Foucault and Democratic Discourse”, History of European Ideas, vol. 20, nos. 4-6 (1995), pp. 909-914.
Alexy, Robert – “Diskurstheorie und Menschenrechte”, in Robert Alexy, Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995), pp. 127-164. English: “Discourse Theory and Human Rights”, Ratio Juris, vol. 9, no. 3 (1996), pp. 209-235, and in Rex Martin & Gerhard Sprenger (eds.), Challenges to Law at the End of the 20th Century: Rights [= Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 67] (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1997), pp. 81-104.
Alexy, Robert – “Jürgen Habermas' Theorie des juristischen Diskurses”, in Robert Alexy, Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995), pp. 165-174. English: “Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Legal Discourse”, in Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1027-1034. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 226-233.
Always, Joan – Critical Theory and Political Possibilities. Conceptions of Emancipatory Politics in the Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse and Habermas (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1995).
Apel, Karl-Otto – “The Rationality of Human Communication: On the Relationship between Consensual, Strategic, and Systems Rationality”, Graduate Faculty Philosophical Journal, vol. 18, no. 1 (1995), pp. 1-25. Repr. in Eduardo Mendieta (ed.), Karl-Otto Apel: Selected Essays, vol. 2: Ethics and the Theory of Rationality (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1996), pp. 316-339, and in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. II (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 93-113. German: Revised version: “Die Vernunftfunktion der kommunikativen Rationalität. Zum Verhältnis von konsensual-kommunikativer Rationalität, strategischer Rationalität und Systemrationalität”, in Karl-Otto Apel & Matthias Kettner (eds.), Die eine Vernunft und die vielen Rationalitäten (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 17-41.
Barry, Jonathan – “A Historical Postscript”, in Dario Castiglione & Lesley Sharpe (eds.), Shifting the Boundaries. Transformation of Languages of Public and Private in the Eighteenth Century (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1995), pp. 220-237.
Baynes, Kenneth – “Democracy and the "Rechtsstaat": Habermas's "Faktizität und Geltung"”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 201-232. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 174-198, and in Kenneth Baynes, Habermas (New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 129-157.
Beilharz, Peter – “Critical Theory - Jürgen Habermas”, in David Roberts (ed), Reconstructing Theory: Gadamer, Habermas, Luhmann (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1995), pp. 39-64.
Bermbach, Udo – “Plädoyer für eine ungeteilte Öffentlichkeit. Anmerkungen zum "normativen Begriff der Öffentlichkeit" von Jürgen Habermas”, in Gerhard Göhler (ed.), Macht der Öffentlichkeit – Öffentlichkeit der Macht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), pp. 25-37.
Bernstein, Jay M. – Recovering Ethical Life. Jürgen Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory (London: Routledge, 1995)
Best, Steven – “Habermas' Theory of Social Evolution”, in Steven Best, The Politics of Historical Vision: Marx, Foucault, Habermas (New York: Guilford Press, 1995), pp. 145-206.
Bialas, Wolfgang – “Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Sozialphilosophie und zeitdiagnostische Variationen zum Thema”, in Christoph Demmerling & Thomas Rentsch (eds.), Die Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 232-248.
Blake, Nigel – “Ideal Speech Conditions, Modern Discourse and Education”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol. 29, no. 3 (1995), pp. 355-367.
Blankenburg, Erhard – “Recht - Lebenswelt, Systemwelt oder Autopoiesis? - Drei Versuche, zu einer umfassenden Rechtssoziologie zu kommen” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], Berliner Journal für Soziologie, vol. 5, no 2 (1995), pp. 265-271.
Blaug, Ricardo – “Distortion of the Face to Face: Communicative Reason and Social Work Practice”, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 25, no. 4 (1995), pp. 423-439.
Bohman, James – “Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict”, Political Theory, vol. 23, no. 2 (1995), pp. 253-279. Repr. in Fred D'Agostino & Gerald F. Gaus (eds.), Public Reason (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 271-298.
Braaten, Jane – “From Communicative Rationality to Communicative Thinking: A Basis for Feminist Theory and Practice”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 139-161.
Bremer, Manuel E. – “Ist die Transzendentalpragmatik letztbegründet oder holistisch?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 26, no. 1 (1995), pp. 153-168.
Chambers, Simone – “Discourse and Democratic Practices”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 233-259.
Chambers, Simone – “Feminist Discourse/Practical Discourse”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 163-179.
Chriss, James J. – “Habermas, Goffman, and Communicative Action: Implications for Professional Practice”, American Sociological Review, vol. 60, no. 4 (1995), pp. 545-565. Repr. in Gary Alan Fine & Gregory W.H. Smith (eds.), Erving Goffman, vol. 4 (London Sage, 2000), pp. 262-290.
Cohen, Jean L. – “Critical Social Theory and Feminist Critiques: The Debate with Jürgen Habermas”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 57-90. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 219-252.
Coles, Romand – “Identity and Difference in the Ethical Positions of Adorno and Habermas”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 19-45.
Cooke, Maeve – “Habermas and Law”, in Gerard Quinn, Attracta Ingram & Stephen Livingstone (eds.), Justice and Legal Theory in Ireland (Dublin: Oak Tree Press, 1995), pp. 121-133.
Cooke, Maeve – “Selfhood and Solidarity”, Constellations, vol. 1, no. 3 (1995), pp. 337-357. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. III (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 3-22.
Couture, Tony – “Feminist Criticisms of Habermas's Ethics and Politics”, Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, vol. 34, no. 2 (1995), pp. 259-279.
Dahlgren, Peter – “Communication and Subjectivity”, in Peter Dahlberg, Television and the Public Sphere. Citizenship, Democracy and the Media (London: Sage, 1995), pp. 98-119.
Davey, Nicholas – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Jenny Teichman & Graham White (eds.), An Introduction to Modern European Philosophy (New York: Macmillan Press, 1995), pp. 145-161.
Dean, Jodi – “Discourse in Different Voices”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 205-229.
Dews, Peter – “Modernity, Self-Consciousness and the Scope of Philosophy: Jürgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich in Debate”, in Peter Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 169-193.
Dews, Peter – “Morality, Ethics, and Postmetaphysical Thinking”. New Books by Jürgen Habermas”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 3, no. 1 (1995), pp. 164-173. Repr. in Peter Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 202-211.
Dews, Peter – “The Paradigm Shift to Communication and the Question of Subjectivity: Reflections on Habermas, Lacan and Mead”, Revue Internationale de Philosphie, vol. 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 483-519.
Dews, Peter – “The Truth of the Subject: Language, Validity, and Transcendence in Lacan and Habermas”, in Peter Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 259-279. Repr. as “The Paradigm Shift to Communication and the Question of Subjectivity: Reflections on Habermas, Mead and Lacan”, in Simon Critchley & Peter Dews (eds.), Deconstructive Subjectivities (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 149-168, and as “Communicative Paradigms and the Question of Subjectivity: Habermas, Mead and Lacan”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 87-117.
Domingues, José Maurício – “Life-World and Systems in Habermas' Historical Materialism”, in José Maurício Domingues, Sociological Theory and Collective Subjectivity (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995), pp. 39-57.
Douramanis, Demetrios – Mapping Habermas from German to English. A Bibliography of Primary Literature 1952–1995 (Sydney: Eurotext, 1995).
Dryzek, John S. – “Critical Theory as a Research Program”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 97-119.
Dworkin, Ronald – “Constitutionalism and Democracy”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 1 (1995), pp. 2-11.
Edgar, Andrew –“Discourse Ethics and Paternalism”, in Yeager Hudson & W. Creighton Peden (eds.), The Social Power of Ideas (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1995), pp. 253-269. [= Philosophy Today, vol. 11, 1995]
Engel, Ulrich – “Konsens und Wahrheit. Reflexionen im Anschluß an Jürgen Habermas”, in Thomas Eggensperger & Ulrich Engel (eds.), Wahrheit (Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald, 1995), pp. 130-148.
Engländer, Armin – “Grundrechte als Kompensation diskursethischer Defizite? Kritische Anmerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas' Diskurstheorie des Rechts”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 81, no. 4 (1995), pp. 482-495.
Ermacora, F. – “Habermas, J.: Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Austrian Journal of Public and International Law, vol. 48, no. 2 (1995), pp. 224-225.
Farrell, Thomas B. – “Comic History Meets Tragic Memory: Burke and Habermas on the Drama of Human Relations”, in Bernard B. Brock, Kenneth Burke and Contemporary European Thought (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995), pp. 34-75.
Flader, Dieter – “Ist die Neurose Folge einer defizienten Rede? Kritische Bemerkungen zu der These von Jürgen Habermas, daß seine Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns einen Bezugsrahmen zur Umformulierung des Freudschen Strukturmodells biete”, in Dieter Flader, Psychoanalyse im Fokus von Handeln und Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995), pp. 356-380.
Fletcher, Robert – “The Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Sociology, vol. 29, no. 4 (1995), pp. 745-747.
Fortin-Melkevik, Anne – “Religion und ethische Rationalität in der Moderne”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 44-71.
Franco, Vittoria – “Ontologie und Ethik. Ein Vergleich von Lukács und Habermas”, in Rüdiger Dannemann (ed.), Objektive Möglichkeit. Beiträge zu Georg Lukács' "Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins" (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 167-176.
Frank, Manfred – “Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 521-550. Repr. in Manfred Frank, Ansichten der Subjektivität (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2012), pp. 29-73.
Gelder, Frederik van – Jürgen Habermas: Science and Crisis. An Annotated Bibliography (New York: Taylor & Francis, 1995).
Gerke, Ernst Otto – “Meinen - Verstehen - Verständigung. Zu den Verstehenskonzeptionen von H. Paul Grice, Jürgen Habermas und Friedrich D. E. Schleiermacher”, Deutsche Sprache, vol. 23, no. 1 (1995), pp. 1-29.
Gosepath, Stefan – “The Place of Equality in Habermas' and Dworkin's Theories of Justice”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 1 (1995), pp. 21-35. German: “Gleichheit in Habermas’ und Dworkins Theorien der Gerechtigkeit”, in Herlinde Pauer-Studer & Herta Nagl-Docekal (eds.), Freiheit, Gleichheit und Autonomie (München: R. Oldenbourg, 2003), pp. 94-116.
Große-Kracht, Herman-Josef – “Demokratie als Verfahren? Habermas' diskurstheoretische Demokratiekonzeption und die Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Kirche und Öffentlichkeit”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 212-235.
Guariglia, Osvaldo – “Zwei aktuelle Versionen des Universalismus: Jürgen Habermas und John Rawls”, in Osvaldo Guariglia, Universalismus und Neuaristotelismus in der zeitgenössischen Ethik (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1995), pp. 61-82.
Günther, Klaus – “Legal Adjudication and Democracy: Some Remarks on Dworkin and Habermas”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 1 (1995), pp. 36-54.
Halton, Eugene – “Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Communicative Etherealization”, in Eugene Halton, Bereft of Reason. On the Decline of Social Thought and the Prospects for Its Renewal (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 191-218.
Halton, Eugene – “The Neopragmatic Acquiescence: Between Habermas and Rorty”, in Eugene Halton, Bereft of Reason. On the Decline of Social Thought and the Prospects for Its Renewal (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 219-246.
Harris, Sandra – “Pragmatics and Power”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 23, no. 2 (1995), pp. 117-135.
Hayes, Geoffrey – “The Role of Criticism in the Epistemology of Habermas and Popper”, South Pacific Journal of Psychology, vol. 8 (1995), pp. 19-25.
Heath, Joseph – “The Problem of Foundationalism in Habermas's Discourse Ethics”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 21, no. 1 (1995), pp. 77-100. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 88-107.
Heath, Joseph – “Threats, Promises and Communicative Action”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 3 (1995), pp. 225-241.
Hesse, Mary – “Habermas and the Force of Dialectical Argument”, History of European Ideas, vol. 21, no. 3 (1995), pp. 367-378.
Hirschi, Hans – “Autonome Moral und christliche Anthropologie”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 97-119.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe – “Recasting the Public Sphere”, October, vol. 73 [no. 102] (1995), pp. 27-54.
Hong, Ki-Su – Zur Dialektik von Tradition und Vernunft in Theorie und Praxis (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1995).
How, Alan – The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social (Aldershot: Avebury, 1995).
Hudson, Hud – “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 1 (1995), pp. 74-77.
Ingram, David – “Discourse Ethics and Democratic Legitimation”, in David Ingram, Reason, History, and Politics (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995), pp. 201-242.
Jacobson, Arthur J. – “Habermas and Luhmann in the American Legal Tradition”, Rechtshistorisches Journal, vol. 14 (1995), pp. 3-12.
Johnson, James – “Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation Between Critical Theory and Rational Choice”, American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 1 (1995), pp. 74-86.
Keck, Otto – “Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ist eine Verbindung von Rational-Choice-Theorie und Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns möglich?”, Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, vol. 2, no. 1 (1995), pp. 5-48.
Kelly, Michael – “Gadamer, Foucault and Habermas on Ethical Critique”, in Lawrence K. Schmidt (ed.), The Specter of Relativism. Truth, Dialogue and "Phronesis" in Philosophical Hermeneutics (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1995), pp. 234-235.
Kerckhove, Lee – “Emancipatory Social Science and Genealogy: Habermas on Nietzsche”, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, vol. 2, no. 1 (1995), pp. 19-26.
Kersting, Wolfgang – “Diskurstheorien (des Kommunikativen Handelns)/Diskurstheorie kommunikativen Handelns”, in Dieter Nohlen & Rainer-Olaf Schultze (eds.), Lexikon der Politik, Band 1: Politische Theorien (München: Beck, 1995), pp. 56-63.
Kettner, Matthias – “Habermas und die Einheit der praktischen Vernunft”, in Axel Wüstehube (ed.), Pragmatische Rationalitätstheorien (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1995), pp. 85-111.
Keulartz, Jozef – Die verkehrte Welt des Jürgen Habermas (Hamburg: Julius, 1995).
Kim, Eun-Young – “Habermas' Paradigmenwechsel zur Intersubjektivität”, in Eun-Young Kim, Norbert Elias im Diskurs von Moderne und Postmoderne (Marburg: Tectum, 1995), pp. 38-59.
Kingwell, Mark – “Justice and Communicative Action”, in Mark Kingwell, A Civil Tongue. Justice, Dialogue, and the Politics of Pluralism (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), pp. 143-191.
Korf-Breitenstein, Sigrid – Menschliche Lebenswelt im technischen Fortschritt. Zur Analyse der technisierten Moderne bei Jürgen Habermas (Hamburg: Kovac, 1995).
Krebs, Angelika – “Feministische Ethik. Eine Kritik der Diskursrationalität”, in Christoph Demmerling, Gottfried Gabriel & Thomas Rentsch (eds.), Vernunft und Lebenspraxis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995), pp. 309-328.
Lesch, Walter – “Transformation theologischer Ethik. Zur theologischen Rezeption einer Diskurstheorie der Moral”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 1-23.
Li, Victor – “Habermas and the Ethnocentric Discourse of Modernity”, in Martin Kreiswirth & Thomas Carmichael (eds.), Constructive Criticism. The Human Sciences in the Age of Theory (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995), pp. 44-60.
Linklater, Andrew – “Jürgen Habermas, The Past as Future” [Book review], Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 30, no. 3 (1995), pp. 614-615.
Loos, Fritz – “Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 21, no. 1 (1995), pp. 140-156.
Love, Nancy S. – “What's Left of Marx?”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 46-66.
Lütterfelds, W. – “Hegels Konzept der Moral als Kritik der Diskursethik”, in Andreas Ardt, Karol Bal & Henning Ottmann (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch 1993/1994 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 204-211.
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias – “Nachmetaphysisches Denken und Religion. Der Beitrag von Jürgen Habermas zu einem offenen Problem”, in Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (ed.), Metaphysikkritik, Ethik, Religion (Würzburg: Echter, 1995), pp. 33-50. Also in Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (ed.), Nachmetaphysisches Denken und Religion (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1996), pp. 65-84.
Malowitz, Karsten – “Ernst Tugendhat und die Diskursethik: Notizen zu einem Widerlegungsprogramm”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 595-604.
Matuštík, Martin J. – “Derrida and Habermas on the Aporia of the Politics of Identity and Difference: Towards Radical Democratic Multiculturalism”, Constellations, vol. 1, no. 3 (1995), pp. 383-398.
Maus, Ingeborg – “Freiheitsrechte und Volkssouveränität. Zu Jürgen Habermas' Rekonstruktion des Systems der Rechte”, Rechtstheorie”, vol. 26, no. 4 (1995), pp. 507-562. Repr. in René von Schomberg & Peter Niesen (ed.), Zwischen Recht und Moral. Neuere Ansätze der Rechts- und Demokratietheori (Münster: Lit, 2002), pp. 221-296. English: “Liberties and Popular Sovereignty: On Jürgen Habermas's Reconstruction of the System of Rights”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 825-882. Repr. in René von Schomberg & Kenneth Baynes (ed.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas's "Between Facts and Norms" (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), pp. 89-128.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 3 (1995), pp. 242-256. Repr. in Richard Kearney & Mark Dooley (eds.), Questioning Ethics (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 164-180, and in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 3-17.
Meehan, Johanna – (ed.) Feminists Read Habermas (London: Routledge, 1995).
|
Feminists Read Habermas
|
Meehan, Johanna – “Introduction”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 1-20.
Mendieta, Eduardo – “Discourse Ethics and Liberation Ethics”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 21, no. 4 (1995), pp. 111-126. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 258-270.
Mezei, György – “Diskursethik und/oder Substanzethik”, in Rüdiger Dannemann (ed.), Objektive Möglichkeit. Beiträge zu Georg Lukács' "Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins" (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 177-184.
Meyer, William J. – “Private Faith or Public Religion? An Assessment of Habermas's Changing View of Religion”, The Journal of Religion, vol. 75, no. 3 (1995), pp. 371-391.
Mihayara, Isamu – “Communicative Universals”, The Monist, vol. 78, no. 1 (1995), pp. 30-40.
Misgeld, Dieter – “Habermas, Jürgen, "Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics"” [Book review], The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 48, no. 3 (1995), pp. 657-658.
Möhle, Marion – “Feministische Auseinandersetzung mit der Diskursetik. Die Debatte um eine weibliche Moral”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 73-95.
Möhrung-Hesse, Matthias – “Ein Sprung in die Gegenwart. Überlegungen zur diskurstheoretischen Transformation christlicher Gesellschaftsethik”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi (eds.), Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 163-190.
Moon, J. Donald – “Practical Discourse and Communicative Ethics”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 143-164.
Mouffe, Chantal – “Post-Marxism: Democracy and Identity”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 13, no. 3 (1995), pp. 259-265.
Müller, Harald – “Spielen hilft nicht immer. Die Grenzen des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes und der Platz der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns in der Analyse internationaler Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, vol. 2, no. 2 (1995), pp. 371-392.
Murphy, Mark – “Habermas and the State of Critical Theory in the 1990s”, Humanity & Society, vol. 19, no. 4 (1995), pp. 113-116.
Niekerk, Anton A. van – “Postmetaphysical Versus Postmodern Thinking: Retaining the Baby Without the Bathwater”, Philosophy Today, vol. 39, no. 2 (1995), pp. 171-184.
Nielsen, Greg – “Bakhtin and Habermas: Toward a Transcultural Ethics”, Theory and Society, vol. 24, no. 6 (1995), pp. 803-835.
Nuyen, A. T. – “Critique of Ideology: Hermeneutics or Critical Theory?”, Human Studies, vol. 17, no. 4 (1994-1995), pp. 419-432.
Oehler, Klaus – “A Response to Habermas”, in Kenneth L. Ketner (ed.) Peirce and Contemporary Thought (New York: Fordham University Press, 1995), pp. 267-271. German: “Peirce und die Theorie der Kommunikation: Eine Erwiderung auf Habermas”, in Klaus Oehler, Sachen und Zeichen: Zur Philosophie des Pragmatismus (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1995), pp. 111-116.
Offenbartl, Susanne – “Die ständige Neukonstruktion patriachalen Denkens in der Moderne”, in Susanne Offenbartl, Keine Moderne ohne Patriarchat? (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 54-77.
Ortmann, Günther – “Kritik: Fenster zu möglichen Welten”, in Günther Ortmann, Formen der Produktion. Organisation und Rekursivität (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 226-252.
Ostovich, Steven T. – “Dewey, Habermas, and the University in Society”, Educational Theory, vol. 45, no. 4 (1995), pp. 465-477.
Ott, Konrad – “Wie ist eine diskursethische Begründung von ökologischen Rechts- und Moralnormen möglich?”, in Dietmar von der Pfordten & Julian Nida-Rümelin (eds.), Ökologische Ethik und Rechtstheorie (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), pp. 325-340. Repr. in Konrad Ott, Vom Begründen zum Handeln. Aufsätze zur angewandten Ethik (Tübingen: Attempto, 1996), pp. 86-12.
Outhwaite, William – “Nietzsche and Critical Theory”, in Peter R. Sedgwick (ed.), Nietzsche: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995), pp. 203-221.
Palaver, Wolfgang – “Macht und Gewalt. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Hannah Arendt und Jürgen Habermas”, in Walter Lesch & Alberto Bondolfi, Theologische Ethik im Diskurs (Tübingen: Francke, 1995), pp. 191-211.
Pensky, Max – “Universalism and the Situated Critic”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 67-94.
Peter, Jürgen – “Jürgen Habermas” + “Die Reaktionen auf die Kontroverse zwischen Jürgen Habermas”, Ernst Nolte und Andreas Hillgruber, in Jürgen Peter, Der Historikerstreit und die Suche nach einer nationalen Identität der achtziger Jahre (Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1995), pp. 105-108 + 109-122.
Pöttker, Horst – “Erkenntnisinteressen – Öffentlichkeit - Modernität. Wissenssoziologische Konzepte bei Theodor Geiger und Jürgen Habermas”, in Siegfried Bachmann (ed.), Theodor Geiger. Soziologe in einer Zeit "zwischen Pathos und Nüchternheit" (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1995), pp, 117-143.
Power, Michael – “Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung” [Book review], Soziale Systeme, vol. 1, no. 1 (1995), pp. 153-155.
Prenner, Andrea – “Mehr als ein Fetzen liberaler Ideologie?”, in Andrea Prenner, Die Konstruktion von Männerrealität in den Nachrichtenmedien (Bochum: Brockmeyer, 1995), pp. 14-31.
Rasmussen, David M. – “Die Rechtswissenschaft und das Problem der Geltung. Kritische Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas”, in Christoph Demmerling & Thomas Rentsch (eds.), Die Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 79-98.
Rasmussen, David M. – “Explorations of the "Lebenswelt": Reflections on Schutz and Habermas”, Human Studies, vol. 7, no. 2 (1995), pp. 127-132.
Rawls, John – “A Reply to Habermas”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, no. 3 (1995), pp. 132-180. Repr. in John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2nd ed., 1996), in B.N. Ray (ed.), John Rawls and the Agenda of Social Justice (New Delhi: Anamika, 2000), pp. 508-557, in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 3-51, and in James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 46-91. German: “Erwiderung auf Habermas”, in Wilfried Hinsch (ed.), Zur Idee des politischen Liberalismus. John Rawls in der Diskussion (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997), pp. 196-262.
Reiman, Jeffrey – “Postmodern Argumentation and Post-Postmodern Liberalism, with Comments on Levinas, Habermas, and Rawls”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 21: On the Relevance of Metaethics (1995), pp. 251-272.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas – “Reden ist nicht billig, Zur Debatte um Kommunikation und Rationalität”, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, vol. 2, no. 2 (1995), pp. 171–184.
Rorty, Richard – “Habermas, Derrida and the Functions of Philosophy”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 49, no. 4 (1995), pp. 437-459. Repr. in Richard Rorty, Truth and Progress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 307-326, in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 3-20, and in Lasse Thomassen (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 46-65. German: “Habermas, Derrida und die Aufgaben der Philosophie”, in Richard Rorty, Philosophie und die Zukunft (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2000), pp. 26-53, and in Richard Rorty, Wahrheit und Fortschritt (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 444-471.
Rosenfeld, Michel – “Law as Discourse: Bridging the Gap Between Democracy and Rights”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 108 (1995), pp. 1163-1189. Repr. in Tom Campbell & Adrienne Stone (eds.), Law and Democracy (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2003), pp. 289-315.
Schlosberg, David – “Communicative Action in Practice: Intersubjectivity and New Social Movements”, Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 2 (1995), pp. 291-311.
Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer – “Die Theorie kommunikativen Handelns - Eine Flaschenpost?”, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, vol. 2, no. 2 (1995), pp. 347–370
Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer – “Das Modell deliberativer Politik bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Reflexive Demokratie. Die demokratische Transformation moderner Politik (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), pp. 102-120.
Schochet, Gordon – “Vices, Benefits, and Civil Society: Mandeville, Habermas, and the Distinction between Public and Private”, Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism, vol. 18, no. 3 (1995), pp. 244-269. Repr. in Paula B. Backschneider & Timothy Dystal (eds.), The Intersections of the Public and Private Spheres in Early Modern England (London: Frank Cass, 1996), pp. 244-269.
Schrödter, Hermann & Thomas M. Schmidt – “Rationalität und Religion. Eine religionsphilosophische Verhältnisbestimmung”, in Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (ed.), Metaphysikkritik, Ethik, Religion (Wüzburg: Echter, 1995), pp. 77-87.
Schuon, Karl Theodor – “Diskurstheoretisch begründete Demokratietheorie”, Perspektiven ds [Perspektiven des demokratischen Sozialismus], vol. 12, no. 3 (1995), pp. 186-197.
Scott, John – “Jürgen Habermas: A New Beginning?” in John Scott, Sociological Theory. Contemporary Debates (Aldershot: Elgar, 1995), pp. 228-253. Revised version: “Jürgen Habermas: A New Synthesis?”, in John Scott, Sociological Theory. Contemporary Debates (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012; 2nd ed.), pp. 157-181.
Siebert, R. J. – “The Critique of Force in Right and State: From Hegel through Benjamin and Marcuse to Habermas”, in Andreas Ardt, Karol Bal & Henning Ottmann (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch 1993/1994 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 170-186.
Simpson, Lorenzo C. – “The Abuse of Repetition for Critique (With Special Reference to the Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas”, in Lorenzo C. Simpson, Technology, Time, and the Conversations of Modernity (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 75-94.
Smith, Tony – “Flexible Production and Habermasian Social Philosophy”, International Studies in Philosophy vol. 27, no. 4 (1995), pp. 85-100.
Somers, Margaret R. – “What's Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation”, Sociological Theory, vol. 13, no. 2 (1995), pp. 113-144.
Somers, Margaret R. – “Narrating and Naturalizing Civil Society and Citizenship Theory: The Place of Political Culture and the Public Sphere”, Sociological Theory, vol. 13, no. 3 (1995), pp. 229-274.
Stevenson, Nick – “Habermas, Mass Culture and the Public Sphere”, in Nick Stevenson, Understanding Media Cultures. Social Theory and Mass Communication (London: Sage, 1995), pp. 47-74.
Strong, Tracy B. & Frank Andreas Sposito – “Habermas's Significant Other”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 263-288.
Teigas, Demetrius – Knowledge and Hermeneutic Understanding: A Study of the Habermas-Gadamer Debate (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1995).
Thumfart, Alexander & Arno Waschkuhn – “Die Zivilgesellschaft als Substrat und Surrogat in der deliberativen Demokratieauffassung von Jürgen Habermas”, Perspektiven ds [Perspektiven des demokratischen Sozialismus], vol. 12, no. 3 (1995), pp. 197-207.
Tietz, Udo – “Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität. Aspekte eines Konfliktes nach der deutschen Einheit”, in Christoph Demmerling & Thomas Rentsch (eds.), Die Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995), pp. 208-231.
Tönnies, Sibylle – “Der Einwand der Idealismus (Habermas)”, in Sibylle Tönnies, Der westliche Universalismus. Eine Verteidigung klassischer Positionen (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 168-182.
Tönnies, Sibylle – “Was immer schon vorausgesetzt ist. Apel, Habermas, Hösle”, Merkur, no. 552 (March 1995), pp. 267-273.
Vetlesen, Arne Johan – “Hannah Arendt, Habermas and the Republican Tradition”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 21, no. 1 (1995), pp. 1-16. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 258-270.
Vogt, Rüdiger – “Im Widerstreit. Der Diskurstheoretiker Jürgen Habermas als Praktiker”, in Ruth Reiher (ed.), Sprache im Konflikt. Zur Rolle der Sprache in sozialen, politischen und militärischen Auseinandersetzungen (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1995), pp. 173-200.
Vollrath, Ernst – “Zwei Begriffe des Politischen? Jürgen Habermas und die störrische Faktizität des Politischen”, in Volker Gerhardt, Henning Ottmann & Martyn P. Thompson (eds.), Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch 1994 (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1995), pp. 175‑192.
La Vopa, Anthony J. – “Herder's "Publikum": Language, Print, and Sociability in Eighteenth-Century Germany”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (1995), pp. 5-24.
Warnke, Georgia – “Communicative Rationality and Cultural Values”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 120-142. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 21-38.
Warnke, Georgia – “Discourse Ethics and Feminist Dilemmas of Difference”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 247-261.
Warren, Mark E. – “The Self in Discursive Democracy”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167-200.
Webster, Frank – “Information Management and Manipulation: Jürgen Habermas and the Decline of the Public Sphere”, in Frank Webster, Theories of the Information Society (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 101-134.
Weinberger, Ota – “Argumentation in Law and Politics”, Communication and Cognition, vol. 28, no. 1 (1995), pp. 37-54.
Weinberger, Ota – “Zur Theorie der politischen Argumentation. Gleichzeitig ein Breitrag zu einem aktuellen Problem der Demokratie”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 26, no. 2 (1995), pp. 163-182. Repr. in Michael Fischer, Peter Koller & Werner Krawietz (eds.), Aus intellektuellem Gewissen (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000), pp. 329-346.
Weir, Allison – “Toward a Model of Self-Identity: Habermas and Kristeva”, in Johanna Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 263-282. Repr. in Amós Nascimento (ed.), A Matter of Discourse. Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 153-174.
Welton, Michael R. – “In Defence of the Lifeworld: A Habermasian Approach to Adult Learning”, in Michael R. Welton (ed.), In Defence of the Lifeworld. Critical Perspectives on Adult Learning (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995), pp. 127-156.
White, Stephen K. – (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
|
The Cambridge Companion to Habermas
|
White, Stephen K. – “Reason, Modernity, and Democracy”, in Stephen K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 3-16.
Whitebook, Joel – “Linguistic Turn or "Bilderverbot"? Wish, Image, and Word in Psychoanalytic Theory”, in Joel Whitebook, Perversion and Utopia. A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995), pp. 165-215.
Würgler, Andreas – “Öffentlichkeit”, in Andreas Würgler, Unruhen und Öffentlichkeit. Städtische und ländliche Protestbewegungen im 18. Jahrhundert (Göttingen: Wallstein, 1995), pp. 29-41.
Young, Dennis & Nikil Bramdaw – “The Dis-closure of the World: Adorno, Derrida and Habermas on Critique”, Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory & Research, vol. 21, no. 1 (1995), pp. 50-66.
Zamora, José A. – “Habermas und die "kommunikative Wende" gegen die Kritische Theorie”, in José A. Zamora, Krise - Kritik – Erinnerung. Ein politisch-theologischer Versuch über das Denken Adornos im Horizont der Krise der Moderne (Münster: Lit, 1995), pp. 12-54.
Zyl, Albert van – “The Dilemma of Grounding in the Modernity-Postmodernity Debate”, South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 4 (1995), pp. 168-174.
1996
Adams, Nick – “Eschatology and Habermas' Ideal Speech Situation”, Modern Believing, vol. 37, no. 2 (1996), pp. 3-10.
Alvesson, Mats – “The Information Meeting as Communicative Distortion: A Habermas-inspired Interpretation”, in Mats Alvesson, Communication, Power and Organization (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996), pp. 137-172.
Arato, Andrew – “Reflexive Law, Civil Society, and Negative Rights”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 785-789.
Baehr, Amy R. – “Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas”, Hypatia, vol. 11, no. 1 (1996), pp. 49-66. Repr. in Henry S. Richardson & Paul J. Weithman (eds.) The Philosophy of Rawls, vol. 3: Opponents and Implications of “A Theory of Justice” (New York: Garland, 1999), pp. 295-312.
Barnikol-Oettler-Jörgensen, Bernhard – “Individuierung durch Vergesellschaftung – J. Habermas”, in Bernhard Barnikol-Oettler-Jörgensen, Das situierte Subjekt. Philosophische, psychologische und theologische Untersuchungen (Essen: Die Blaue Eule, 1996), pp. 53-96.
Baruzzi, Arno – “Rechts-Autonomie und Rechts-Autopoiesis der Gesellschaft?” [Book review: Faktizität und Geltung et al.], Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 103 (1996), pp. 181-190.
Baynes, Kenneth – “Public Reason and Personal Autonomy”, in David M. Rasmussen (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 243-254.
Bernstein, Richard J. – “The Retrieval of the Democratic Ethos”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1083-1125. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 287-306.
Bialas, Wolfgang – Von der Revolution der Klasse zur Evolution der Vernunft. Vernunftphilosophie in kommunikationstheoretischer Begründung (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996).
Bialas, Wolfgang – “Herrschaftsfreie Kommunikation – Jürgen Habermas und die Illusionen der Intellektuellen”, in Wolfgang Bialas, Vom unfreien Schweben zum freien Fall. Ostdeutsche Intellektuelle im gesellschaftlichen Umbruch (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1996), pp. 241-253.
Birrell, Francis M. – “"Abenteuerlich Mißverstanden?" Habermas's Reception and Interpretation of Schiller”, German Life and Letters, vol. 49, no. 3 (1996), pp. 297-309.
Blaug, Ricardo – “New Theories of Discursive Democracy: A User's Guide”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 22, no. 1 (1996), pp. 49-80.
Bohman, James – “Critical Theory and Democracy”, in David M. Rasmussen (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 190-215. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. III (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 186-210.
Bohman, James – “Two Versions of the Linguistic Turn: Habermas and Poststructuralism”, in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 197-220.
Boudon, Raymond – “Touraine's Subject versus Rawls's "Home Politicus" and Habermas's "Homo Communicans"”, in Jon Clark & Marco Diani (eds.), Alain Touraine (London: Falmer Press, 1996), pp. 263-274.
Bowring, Finn – “A Lifeworld without a Subject: Habermas and the Pathologies of Modernity”, Telos, no. 106 (1996), pp. 77-104
Breuer, Ingeborg & Peter Leusch – “Kritik der Verständigungsverhältnisse. Zur Philosophie von Jürgen Habermas”, in Ingeborg Breuer & Peter Leusch, Welten im Kopf. Profile der Gegenwartsphilosophie (Hamburg: Rotbuch, 1996), pp. 117-134.
Breuer, Stefan – “Bombenstimmung im Brevir. Jürgen Habermas lädt ein zur philosophischen Splitterlese” [Book review; Vom sinnlichen Eindruck], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 26-02-1997.
Brunkhorst, Hauke – “Rorty, Putnam and the Frankfurt School”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 22, no. 5 (1996), pp. 1-16.
Calhoun, Craig – “Social Theory and the Public Sphere”, in Bryan S. Turner (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 429-470.
Cameron, W.S.K. – “On Communicative Actors Talking Past One Another. The Gadamer-Habermas Debate”, Philosophy Today, vol. 40, no. 1 (1996), pp. 160-168.
Chambers, Simone – Reasonable Democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).
Chriss, James J. – “The Young Parsons and the Mature Habermas”, The American Sociologist, vol. 27, no. 4 (1996), pp. 38-40.
Cohen, Jean L. – “The Public Sphere, The Media and Civil Society”, in András Sajó & Monroe Price (eds), Rights of Access to the Media (Hague: Kluwer Law International Press, 1996), pp. 29-50.
Coole, Diana – “Habermas and the Question of Alterity”, in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 221-244.
Crook, Stephen – “Jürgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action; Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas; Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays; Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics” [Book review], Thesis Eleven, no. 44 (1996), pp. 126-135.
Crosswhite, James – “Jürgen Habermas and Validity Claims”, in James Crosswhite, The Rhetoric of Reason (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1996), pp. 57-62.
Crossley, Nick – “System, Lifeworld and Communicative Action” + “Intersubjectivity and Power”, in Nick Crossley, Intersubjectivity. The Fabric of Social Becoming (London: Sage, 1996), pp. 99-149.
Dahrendorf, Ralf – “Der Diskursrepublikaner. Jürgen Habermas über die "Einbeziehung des Anderen"” [Book review], Frankfurter Rundschau 02-10-1996.
Davis, Belinda – “Reconsidering Habermas, Gender, and the Public Sphere: The Case of Wilhelmine Germany”, in Geoff Eley (ed.), Society, Culture, and State in Germany, 1870-1930 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996), pp. 397-426.
Dean, Jodi – “Civil Society: Beyond the Public Sphere”, in David M. Rasmussen (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 220-242.
Dean, Jodi – “Feminism and Universalism”, in Jodi Dean, Solidarity of Strangers. Feminism after Identity Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 140-174.
Deckert, Martina R. – “Recht und Wahrheit. Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diskussion”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 82, no. 1 (1996), pp. 43-54.
Deflem, Mathieu – (ed.) Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage Publications, 1996). [= Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 20, no. 4 (1994)]
|
Habermas, Modernity and Law
|
Doepke, Frederick – “Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jurgen Habermas” [Book review], Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 26, no. 4 (1996), pp. 563-567.
Dykstal, Timothy – “Past as Future. By Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Southern Humanities Review, vol. 30, no. 4 (1996), pp. 375-379.
Dyzenhaus, David – “The Legitimacy of Legality” [Book review; Faktizität und Geltung], University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 46, no. 1 (1996), pp. 129-180. Repr. in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 82, no. 3 (1996), pp. 324-360.
Eickelpasch, Rolf – “Bodenlose Vernunft. Zum utopischen Gehalt des Konzepts kommunikativer Rationalität bei Habermas”, in Rolf Eickelpasch & Armin Nassehi (eds.), Utopie und Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 11-50.
Engel, Gerhard – “Die Grenzen der politischen Öffentlichkeit: Jürgen Habermas und die konstitutionelle Gesellschaftstheorie”, in Ingo Pies (ed.), James Buchanans konstitutionelle Ökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr, 1996), pp. 19-55.
Feenberg, Andrew – “Marcuse or Habermas: Two Critiques of Technology”, Inquiry, vol. 39, no. 1 (1996), pp. 45-70. Repr. in Michael Wayne Howard (ed.), Socialism (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2001), pp. 343-368. Revised version: “Critical Theories of Technology”, in Andrew Feenberg, Questioning Technology (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 151-180. Repr. in Peter Beilharz (ed.), Postwar American Critical Thought, vol. 3 (London: Sage, 2006), pp. 197-224.
Femia, Joseph – “Complexity and Deliberative Democracy”, An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, no. 3 (1996), pp. 359-397.
Ferrara. Alessandro – “The Communicative Paradigm in Moral Theory”, in David M. Rasmussen (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 119-137. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 119-136, and in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 103-121.
Fleming, Marie – “Working in the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Habermas, Foucault, and Derrida”, Philosophy Today, vol. 40, no. 1 (1996), pp, 169-178.
Forbath, William E. – “Short-Circuit: A Critique of Habermas's Understanding of Law, Politics, and Economic Life”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1441-1456. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 272-286.
Frankenberg, Günter – “Why Care? – The Trouble with Social Rights”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1365-1390.
Fultner, Barbara – “The Redemption of Truth: Idealization, Acceptability and Fallibilism in Habermas' Theory of Meaning”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 4, no. 2 (1996), pp. 233-251.
Gallagher, Shaun – “Some Particular Limitations of Postconventional Universality: Hegel and Habermas”, in Lenore Langsdorf, Stephen H. Watson & E. Marya Bower (eds.), Phenomenology, Interpretation, and Community (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 115-126.
Ganßmann, Heiner – “Arbeit als instrumentelles Handeln: Habermas”, in Heiner Ganßmann, Geld und Arbeit. Wirtschaftssoziologische Grundlagen einer Theorie der modernen Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1996), pp. 54-70.
Goldblatt, David – “Social and Cultural Origins of the Environmental Movements: Jürgen Habermas”, in David Goldblatt, Social Theory and the Environment (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 112-153.
Goodrich, Peter – “Habermas and the Postal Rule”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1457-1476.
Gould, Mark – “Law and Philosophy: Some Consequences for the Law Deriving from the Sociological Reconstruction of Philosophical Theory”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1239-1363.
Graham, Paul – “Habermas’s Rectifying Revolution”, International Politics, vol. 33, no. 1 (1996), pp. 3-25.
Günther, Klaus – “Communicative Freedom, Communicative Power, and Jurisgenesis”, in Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1035-1058. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 234-254.
Haacke, Jürgen – “Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-reflection, Rational Argumentation”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 25, no. 2 (1996), pp.255-290.
Haba, Enrique P. – “Standortbestimmung zeitgenössischer Rechtstheorie – Rawls, Dworkin, Habermas und andere Mitglieder der "Heiligen (Rede-)Familie"”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 277-327 [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996).]
Hartwig, Sabine – “Ontologische Unsicherheit im Kontext der modernen Lebenswelt, in Sabine Hartwig”, Ambivalente Entwurfsstrukturen in der Moderne (Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag, 1996), pp. 113-143.
Heath, Joseph – “Is Language a Game?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 26, no. 1 (1996), pp. 1-28.
Heath, Joseph – “Rational Choice as Critical Theory”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 22, no.5 (1996), pp. 43-62.
Heidbrink, Ludger – “Versuche mit deliberativer Politik. Jürgen Habermas: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen” [Book review], Süddeutsche Zeitung, 06-11-1996.
Heming, Ralf – Individuum, Soziogenese und kommunikative Kompetenz (Sinzheim: Pro Universitate, 1996).
Hendley, Steven – “From Communicative Action to the Face of the Other: Habermas and Levinas on the Foundations of Moral Theory”, Philosophy Today, vol. 40, no. 4 (1996), pp. 504-530.
Herget, James E. – “Discourse Theory”, in James E. Herget, Contemporary German Legal Philosophy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), pp. 44-61.
Hoerschelmann, Thomas – Theologische Ethik. Zur Begründungsproblematik christlicher Ethik im Kontext der diskursiven Moraltheorie (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1996).
Höffe, Otfried – “Wie tief reicht die Diskurstheorie?”, in Otfried Höffe, Vernunft und Recht. Bausteine zu einem interkulturellen Rechtsdiskurs (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 153-159. English: “How Far Does Discourse Theory Take Us?” = part 5 of “Habermas and the Conversion of Critical Theory”, in Otfried Höffe, Categorical Principles of Law. A Counterpoint to Modernity (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2002), pp. 249-287 [pp. 283-287].
Holub, Renate – “Timely Normalcy: On Intellectuals, Cultural Translation, and Political Theory. Die Normalität einer Berliner Republik, by Jürgen Habermas; et al.” [Book review], German Politics & Society, vol. 14, no 2 (1996), pp. 124-134.
Howard, Dick – “Law and Political Culture”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1391-1429. Repr. in Dick Howard, Political Judgments (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996), pp. 171-201.
Hutchings, Kimberly – “Habermas and the Possibility of Critical Theory”, in Kimberly Hutchings, Kant, Critique, and Politics (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 58-80.
Imhof, Kurt – “Entzauberung”, in Kurt Imhof & Gaetano Romano (eds.), Die Diskontinuität der Moderne. Zur Theorie des sozialen Wandels (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1996), pp. 12-67.
Ingram, David – “The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse: Aesthetic Judgement and Political Rationality”, in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 269-301.
Ipperciel, Donald – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Donald Ipperciel, Freud als Aufklärer. Zur Rezeption der Freudschen Psychoanalyse in der Frankfurter Schule (Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1996), pp. 209-236.
Jacobson, Arthur J. – “Law and Order”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 919-933. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 190-203.
Jalbert, John E. – “Habermas, Fichte and the Question of Technological Determinism”, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 70 (1996), pp. 209-218.
Kersting, Wolfgang – “Der Hüter der Moderne. Jürgen Habermas' neue politische Theorie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht” [Book review], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 05-11-1996. Repr. as “Der Hüter der Moderne – Jürgen Habermas über die Vergangenheit des Nationalstaats und die Zukunft der Natur”, in Wolfgang Kersting, Gerechtigkeit und Lebenskunst (Paderborn: Mentis, 2005), pp. 80-98.
Kingwell, Mark – “"Phronesis" and Political Dialogue”, in Stephen L. Esquith (ed.), Political Dialogue: Theories and Practices (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996), pp. 167-182.
Kneer, Georg – “Kommunikation und Vernunft. Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, in Georg Kneer, Rationalisierung, Disziplinierung und Differenzierung. Zum Zusammenhang von Sozialtheorie und Zeitdiagnose bei Jürgen Habermas, Michel Foucault und Niklas Luhmann (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1996), pp. 39-162.
Kneer, Georg – “Notwendigkeit der Utopie oder Utopie der Kontingenz? Ein Beitrag zum Streit zwischen Universalismus und Kontextualismus”, in Rolf Eickelpasch & Armin Nassehi (eds.), Utopie und Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 51-85.
Kögler, Hans-Herbert – “Kritische Sprechakttheorie oder Semiotik der Macht? Habermas und die Wittgenstein-Tradition”, Wittgenstein-Studien, vol. 3, no. 1 (1996).
Kögler, Hans-Herbert – “The Self-empowered Subject: Habermas, Foucault and Hermeneutic Reflexivity”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 22, no. 4 (1996), pp. 13-44.
Kohler, Georg – “Warum wir Habermas lesen. “Die Einbeziehung des Anderen”, sein neuestes Buch” [Book review], Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 01-10-1996.
Kramer, Lloyd – “Habermas, Foucault, and the Legacy of Enlightenment Intellectuals”, in Donald Reid, Stephen Leonard & Leon Fink (eds.), Intellectuals and Public Life. Between Radicalism and Reform (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 29-50.
Kühnlein, Michael – “Aufhebung des Religiösen durch Versprachlichung? Eine religionsphilosophische Untersuchung des Rationalitätskonzeptes von Jürgen Habermas”, Theologie und Philosophie, vol. 71 (1996), pp. 390-409.
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz – “Rechtliche Ordnungsbildung unter Ungewissheitsbedingungen und intersubjektive Rationalität”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 385-414 [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]
Leeper, Roy V. – “Moral Objectivity, Jürgen Habermas's Discourse Ethics, and Public Relations”, Public Relations Review, vol. 22, no. 2 (1996), pp. 133-150.
Lenoble, Jacques – “Law and Undecidability: A New Vision of the Proceduralization of Law”, in Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 935-1004. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 37-81.
Linklater, Andrew – “The Achievements of Critical Theory”, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth & Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 279-298. Repr. in Andrew Linklater, Critical Theory and World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2007), pp. 45-59.
Martinson, Steven D. – “Conversations with Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jürgen Habermas: A Chapter on the Reception of Friedrich Schiller in the Twentieth Century”, in Steven D. Martinson, Harmonious Tensions. The Writings of Friedrich Schiller (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996), pp. 276-292.
Maus, Ingeborg – “Zum Verhältnis von Recht und Moral aus demokratietheoretischer Sicht”, in Kurt Bayertz (ed.), Politik und Ethik (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1996), pp. 194-227.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Vernunft, Sollen, and the Enlightenment Project Today”, in Karl Graf Ballestrem & Henning Ottmann (eds.), Theorie und Praxis. Festschrift für Nikolaus Lobkowicz zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996), pp. 59-76.
Mertens, Thomas – “Cosmopolitanism and Citizenship: Kant Against Habermas”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 3 (1996), pp. 328-347.
Michelman, Frank I. – “Between Facts and Norms, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 93, no. 6 (1996), pp. 307-315.
Michelman, Frank I. – “Family Quarrel”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1163-1177. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 309-322.
Mill, David van – “Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedure”, Journal of Politics, vol. 58, no. 3 (1996) pp. 734-752.
Morris, Martin – “On the Logic of the Performative Contradiction: Habermas and the Radical Critique of Reason”, The Review of Politics, vol. 58, no. 4 (1996), pp. 735-760.
Motzkin, Gabriel – “Habermas's Ideal Paradigm of Law”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1431-1439.
Müller, Michael – “Vom Dissensrisiko zur Ordnung der internationalen Staatenwelt. Zum Projekt einer normativ gehaltvollen Theorie der internationalen Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, vol. 3, no. 2 (1996), pp. 367-379.
Münkler, Herfried – “Die Kraft des zwanglosen Arguments. Diskurse als Ausfallbürgschaft der Ethik: Jürgen Habermas' neue Studien zur politischen Theorie” [Book review], Die Zeit, 06-12-1996.
Nak-Chung, Paik – “Habermas on National Unification in Germany and Korea”, New Left Review, no. 219 (1996), pp. 14-21.
Neumann, Ulfrid – “Zur Interpretation des forensischen Diskurses in der Rechtsphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 415-426. [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)] Repr. in Ulfried Neumann, Recht als Struktur und Argumentation (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008), pp. 23-34.
Nino, Carlos Santiago – “Epistemic Constructivism: Between Rawls and Habermas”, in Carlos Santiago Nino, The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), pp. 107-117.
Nollman, Gerd – “Dreistrahlige Vernunft? Zum utopischen Potential des Ästhetischen in Habermas' Kommunikationstheorie”, in Rolf Eickelpasch & Armin Nassehi (eds.), Utopie und Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 86-109.
Oliga, John C. – “Critical Social Theory: From Epistemology to Communicative Paradigm”, in John C. Oliga, Power, Ideology, and Control (New York: Plenum Press, 1996), pp. 199-272.
Ott, Konrad – “Wie begründet man ein Diskursprinzip der Moral? Ein neuer Versuch zu "U" und "D"”, in Konrad Ott, Vom Begründen zum Handeln. Aufsätze zur angewandten Ethik (Tübingen: Attempto, 1996), pp. 12-50.
Outhwaite, William – “General Introduction”, in William Outhwaite (ed.), The Habermas Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 1-22.
Owen, D. – “Foucault, Habermas and the Claims of Reason”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2 (1996), pp. 119-138.
Pamerleau, William C. – “Can Habermas's Discourse Ethics Accommodate the Feminist Perspective?” Social Philosophy Today, vol. 12 (1996), pp. 235-252. (= Yager Hudson (ed.), Rending and Renewing the Social Order (Lewiston: Edward Mellon Press, 1996)].
Parkin, Andrew C. – “On the Practical Relevance of Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action”, Social Theory & Practice, vol. 22, no. 3 (1996), pp. 417-441.
Passerin d'Entrèves, Maurizio & Seyla Benhabib – (eds.) Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
|
Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity
|
Passerin d'Entrèves, Maurizio – “Introduction”, in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 1-37.
Pawlik, Michael – “Die Verdrängung des Subjekts und ihre Folgen. Begründungsdefizite in Habermas' "System der Rechte"”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 441-447. [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]
Pensky, Max – “Ghost Stories: Critical Remembrance and Justice in Derrida and Habermas”, in Lenore Langsdorf, Stephen H. Watson & E. Marya Bower (eds.), Phenomenology, Interpretation, and Community (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 237-251.
Peterson, Richard T. – “Thinking Philosophically with the Idea of the Division of Labor”, in Richard T. Peterson, Democratic Philosophy and the Politics of Knowledge (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1996), pp. 115-180.
Pfahl-Traughber, Armin – “Die Normalität einer Berliner Republik. Kleine politische Schriften VIII, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Zeitschrift für Politik, vol. 43, no. 1 (1996), p. 99.
Phillips, Kendall R. – “The Spaces of Public Dissension: Reconsidering the Public Sphere”, Communication Monographs, vol. 63, no. 3 (1996), pp. 231-248.
Posner, Richard A. – “Law's Reason: Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], New Republic, 06-05-1996, pp. 26-29.
Power, Michael K. – “Habermas and the Counterfacual Imagination”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1005-1025. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 207-225.
Pressler, Charles A. – “Critical Interpretation: Jürgen Habermas”, in Charles A. Pressler, Sociology and Interpretation: From Weber to Habermas (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 149-172.
Preuß, Ulrich K. – “Communicative Power and the Concept of Law”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1179-1192. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 323-335.
Preyer, Gerhard – “Entscheidung - Rechtsgeltung – Argumentation”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 367-381. [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]
Preyer, Gerhard – “Zwei Konstruktionsprobleme der "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns"”, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, vol. 6, no. 4 (1996), pp. 551-563.
Prittwitz, Volker von – “Verständigung über die Verständigung. Anmerkungen und Ergänzungen zur Debatte über Rationalität und Kommunikation in den Internationalen Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, vol. 3, no. 1 (1996), pp. 133–148.
Rainey, R. Randall & William Rehg – “The Marketplace of Ideas, the Public Interest and Federal Regulation of the Electronic Media: Implications of Habermas' Theory of Democracy”, Southern California Law Review, vol. 69, no. 6 (1996), pp. 1923-1987.
Rasmussen, David M. – “Jurisprudence and Validity”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1059-1082. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas vol. 2 (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 316-336.
Rehg, William – “Translator's Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996), pp. ix- xliii. Revised version: “Habermas's Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy: An Overview of the Argument”, in David Rasmussen (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 166-189. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas vol. 2 (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 271-292.
Rehg, William – “Against Subordination: Morality, Discourse, and Decision in the Legal Theory of Jürgen Habermas”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1147-1162. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 257-271.
Rehg, William – “The Place of Consensus in Democratic Legitimation: A Recommendation”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 461-473. [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]
Rehg, William & James Bohman – “Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of Legitimacy in Habermas' "Faktizität und Geltung"”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 1 (1996), pp. 79-99. Repr. in René von Schomberg & Kenneth Baynes (ed.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas's "Between Facts and Norms" (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), pp. 31-60.
Roberts, Patricia – “Habermas, "Philosophes", and Puritans: Rationality and Exclusion in the Dialectical Public Sphere”, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1 (1996), pp. 47-68.
Rorty, Richard – “Emancipating our Culture”, in Jósef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy. Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski (Wesrport: Praeger, 1996), pp. 24-30.
Rorty, Richard – “The Ambiguity of "Rationality"”, Constellations, vol. 3, no. 1 (1996), pp. 73-82. Repr. in William Rehg & James Bohman, Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn. The Transformation of Critical Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001), pp. 41-52.
Rosenfeld, Michel – “Can Rights, Democracy, and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory? Reflections on Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 791-824. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 82-112, and in Roger Cotterrell (ed.), Law in Social Theory (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 213-246.
Sajó, András – “Constitutional Adjudication in Light of Discourse Theory”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1193-1229. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 336-370.
Scambler, Graham – “The "Project of Modernity" and the Parameters for a Critical Sociology: An Argument with Illustrations from Medical Sociology”, Sociology, vol. 30, no. 3 (1996), pp. 567-581. Repr. in William K. Carroll (ed.), Critical Strategies for Social Research (Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press, 2004), pp. 361-368.
Schilling, Christoph – “"Moralische Autonomie" in der Diskurstheorie von Habermas”, in Christoph Schilling, Moralische Autonomie. Anthropologische und diskurstheoretische Grundstrukturen (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1996), pp. 11-39.
Schindler, Ronald Jeremiah – “Habermas's historical materialism and semiotic phenomenology”, in Ronald Jeremiah Schindler, The Frankfurt School Critique of Capitalist Culture. A critical theory for post-democratic society and its re-education (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1996), pp. 80-101.
Schlink, Bernhard – “The Dynamics of Constitutional Adjudication”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 1231-1238. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 371-378.
Schmid, Hans Bernhard – “"Lebenswelt" zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, vol. 22, no. 1 (1996), pp.161-181.
Sedmak, Clemens – “Habermas' kommunikationstheoretische Weiterführung”, in Clemens Sedmak, Kalkül und Kultur. Studien zu Genesis und Geltung von Wittgensteins Sprachspielmodell (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996), pp. 245-256.
Schmidt, James – “Habermas and Foucault”, in Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves & Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 147-171.
Sitton, John F. – “Reification Without the Proletariat: The Argument of Jürgen Habermas”, in John F. Sitton, Recent Marxian theory. Class formation and social conflict in contemporary capitalism (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 151-199.
Sölter, Arpad A. – Moderne und Kulturkritik. Jürgen Habermas und das Erbe der Kritischen Theorie (Bonn: Bouvier, 1996).
Stein, Peter – “Zum Verhältnis von Literatur und Öffentlichkeit bis zum deutschen Vormärz. Oder: Wie schlüssig ist Jürgen Habermas' "Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit" für die Literaturgeschichte?”, in Helmut Koopmann & Martina Lauster (eds.), Vormärzliteratur in europäischer Perspektive, Bd. I (Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 1996), pp. 55-84.
Steinhoff, Uwe – “Probleme der Legitimation des demokratischen Rechtsstaats”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 449-459. [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]
Stender, Wolfram – “Kritische Theorie als Reflexionswissenschaft”, in Wolfram Stender, Kritik und Vernunft. Studien zu Horkheimer, Habermas und Freud (Lüneburg: zu Klampen, 1996), pp. 139-209.
Sunstein, Cass R. – “Democracy Isn't What You Think. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], New York Book Review, 18-08-1996, p. 106.
Tejera, Victorino – “Has Habermas Understood Peirce?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 32, no. 1 (1996), pp. 107-125.
Teubner, Gunther – “"De collisione discursuum": Communicative Rationalities in Law, Morality and Politics”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, nos. 4-5 (1996), pp. 901-918. Repr. in Michel Rosenfeld & Andrew Arato (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 173-189, and in Roger Cotterrell (ed.), Law in Social Theory (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 269-286.
Thibault, Paul J. & Theo van Leeuwen – “Grammar, Society, and the Speech Act: Renewing the Connections”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25 (1996), pp. 561-585.
Thomä, Dieter – “German Concord, German Discord: Two Concepts of a Nation and the Challenge of Multiculturalism”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 3 (1996), pp. 348-368.
Tlatli, Soraya – “The Intoxication of the Avant-Garde in Benjamin and Habermas”, in Stephen Barker (ed.), Signs of Change: Premodern – Modern – Postmodern (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 289-296.
Tucker, Kenneth H. – “Harmony and Transgression: Aesthetic Imagery and the Public Sphere in Habermas and Poststructuralism”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 16 (1996), pp, 101-120.
Tucker Jr., Kenneth H. – “Public Discourse and Civil Society: Habermas, Bourdieu, and the New Social Movements”, in Kenneth H. Tucker Jr., French Revolutionary Syndicalism and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 51-10.
Veith, Hermann – “Kommunikative Verständigung und soziale Identitätsentwicklung: Gesellschaftstheorie und Sozialisationstheorie bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Hermann Veith, Theorien der Sozialisation. Zur Rekonstruktion des modernen sozialisationstheoretischen Denkens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 471-505.
Vogel, Steven – “Marcuse, Habermas, and the Retreat to Nature”, in Steven Vogel, Against Nature: The Concept of Nature in Critical Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 101-144.
Vollrath, Ernst – “Proteus und Medusa. Die politische Apperzeption der deutschen Staatsrechtstradition im Werk von Jürgen Habermas”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 37, no. 2 (1996), pp. 341-356.
Warren, Mark E. - “Deliberative Democracy and Authority”, American Political Science Review, vol. 90 (1996), pp. 46-60.
Weinberger, Ota – “Diskursive Demokratie ohne Diskursphilosophie”, Rechtstheorie, vol. 27, no. 3 (1996), pp. 427-437 [ = Werner Krawietz & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)]. Repr. in Michael Fischer, Peter Koller & Werner Krawietz (eds.), Aus intellektuellem Gewissen (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000), pp. 381-390.
Wells, Susan – Sweet Reason. Rhetoric and the Discourses of Modernity (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Welsch, Wolfgang – “Jürgen Habermas oder Von der "Dialektik der Aufklärung" zum kommunikationstheoretischen Paradigma der Vernunft”, in Wolfgang Welsch, Vernunft. Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 99-140.
Werner, Johannes – “Habermas' Theorie der Verständigungsrationalität und ihre argumentations- und ästhetiktheoretischen Erweiterungen”, in Johannes Werner, Literatur im Unterrichtsgespräch - die Struktur des literaturrezipierenden Diskurses (München: Ernst Vögel, 1996), pp. 39-102.
West, David – “Habermas and the Renewal of Critical Theory”, in David West, An Introduction to Continental Philosophy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 67-78.
West, David – “Jürgen Habermas, The Past as Future” [Book review], Thesis Eleven, no. 45 (1996), pp. 129-131.
White, Stephen K. – “Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des Demokratischen Rechtsstaat, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Political Theory, vol. 24, no. 1 (1996), pp. 128-132.
Wiehl, Reiner – “Karl-Jaspers-Preis 1995. Laudatio auf Jürgen Habermas”, Heidelberger Jahrbücher, vol. 40 (1996), pp. 15-24.
Williams, Howard; Catherine Bishop & Colin Wight – “German (Re)Unification: Habermas and his Critics”, German Politics, vol. 5, no. 2 (1996), pp. 214-239. Repr. in Howard Williams, Colin Wight & Norbert Kapferer (eds.), Political Thought and German Reunification. The New German Ideology? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 41-63.
Young, Iris Marion – “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy”, in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 120-135. Repr. in Iris Marion Young, Intersecting Voices (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 60-74.
Young, Robert – Intercultural Communication. Pragmatics, Genealogy, Deconstruction (Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1996) [Chapter 5, 6 + 7, pp. 113-207.]
Zahavi, Dan – “Phänomenologie und Sprachpragmatik”, in Dan Zahavi, Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivität. Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996), pp. 137-168. English: “Phenomenology and the Pragmatics of Language”, in Dan Zahavi, Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity. A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2001), pp. 178ff.
1997
Apel. Karl-Otto – “Plurality of the Good? The Problem of Affirmative Tolerance in a Multicultural Society from an Ethical Point of View”, Ratio Juris, vol. 10, no. 2 (1997), pp. 199-212. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 147-160.
Arens, Edmund – (ed.) Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöning, 1997).
|
Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube
|
Arens, Edmund – “Interruptions: Critical Theory and Political Theology between Modernity and Postmodernity”, in David Batstone et al. (eds.), Liberation Theologies, Postmodernity, and the Americas (New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 222-242.
Arens, Edmund – “Theologie und Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns im Diskurs. Eine Einleitung”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 9-32.
Arens, Edmund – “Tod und Transzendenz. Eschatologische Anfragen an die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 135-161.
Assheuer, Thomas – “Erleuchtung statt Verheißung. Die Symbolisierung der Welt” [Book review], Die Zeit, 01-08-1997.
Avio, Kenneth L. – “Constitutional Contract and Discourse Ethics: The Agreement Theories of James Buchanan and Jürgen Habermas”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 9, no. 4 (1997), pp. 533- 553.
Baumgart, Franzjörg – “Ich-Identität als Ziel der Sozialisation”, in Franzjörg Baumgart (ed.), Theorien der Sozialisation (Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 1997), pp. 153-165.
Bausch, Kenneth C. – “The Habermas/Luhmann Debate and Subsequent Habermasian Perspectives on Systems Theory”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 14, no. 5 (1997), pp. 315-330.
Benhabib, Seyla – “The Embattled Public Sphere: Hannah Arendt, Jürgen Habermas and Beyond”, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, vol. 90, no. 1 (1997) pp. 1-24. Repr. in Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed,), Reasoning Practically (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 164-181. German: “Die gefährdete Öffentlichkeit”, Transit, no. 13 (1997), pp. 26-41.
Benhabib, Seyla – “In the Shadow of the Wall” [Book review; A Berlin Republic], The Nation, 29-12-1997, pp. 18-21.
Benhabib, Seyla – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], American Political Science Review, vol. 91, no. 3 (1997), pp. 725-726.
Berner, Knut – “Grundlegung: Philosophische Deutungskategorien” + “Zuordnung: Diskurstheorie und Theologische Wirklichkeitsdeutung”, in Knut Berner, Gesetz im Diskurs. Konsequenzen theologisch-philosophischer Wirklichkeitsdeutung (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1997), pp. 15-61 + 63-111.
Blaug, Ricardo – “Between Fear and Disappointment: Critical, Empirical and Political Uses of Habermas”, Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 1 (1997), pp. 100-117.
Boeve, Lieven – “Critical Consciousness in the Postmodern Condition: New Opportunities for Theology?”, Philosophy and Theology, vol. 10, no. 2 (1997), pp. 449-468.
Bohman, James – “Pluralismus, Kulturspezifität und kosmopolitische Öffentlichkeit im Zeichen der Globalisierung”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 45, no. 6 (1997), pp. 927-942. English: "The Globalization of the Public Sphere. Cosmopolitan Publicity and the Problem of Cultural Pluralism", Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 24, no. 2-3 (1998), pp. 199-216. Also in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 75, no. 2 (1998), pp. 101-117. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 337-252.
Bonacker, Thorsten – Kommunikation zwischen Konsens und Konflikt. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen gesellschaftlicher Rationalität bei Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann (Oldenburg: BIS Verlag, 1997)
Bondolfi, Alberto – “Zwischen Faktizität und Geltung. Zur Bedeutung der Habermasschen Rechtsauffassung für die theologische Ethik”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 163-178.
Bornedal, Peter – “Deconstruction under Debate” + “The Logic of Rational Communication”, in Peter Bornedal, Speech and System (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 1997), pp. 279-299 + 315-329.
Boxberger, Gerald – “Transmissionsprozesse im diskurstheoretischen Modell von Habermas”, in Gerald Boxberger, Sozialpolitik und Transformationsprozesse. Kosten der polnischen Transformation und ihre Minderung über staatliche Sozialpolitik und Selbsthilfeinitiativen (Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 1997), pp. 17-54.
Brunner, José – “Pride and Memory: Nationalism, Narcissism and the Historians' Debate”, History and Memory, vol. 9, nos. 1-2 (1997), pp. 256-300.
Bubner, Rüdiger – “Versuch eines Überblicks über die Modernitätsproblematik” [Book review: Jürgen Habermas, Die Moderne – ein unvollendetes Projekt, et al.], Philosophische Rundschau, vol. 44, no. 3 (1997), pp. 191-207.
Buchwalter, Andrew – “Structure or Sentiment? Habermas, Hegel, and the Conditions of Solidarity”, Philosophy Today, vol. 41, supplement (1997), pp. 49-54. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. III (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 229-237.
Burton, Mark – “Determinacy, Indeterminacy and Rhetoric in a Pluralist World”, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 21, no. 2 (1997), pp. 544-583. Repr. in Francis J. Mootz III (ed.), Gadamer and Law (London: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 397-436.
Coles, Romand – “Habermas: Coordination Pressures and the Truncation of Communication”, on Romand Coles, Rethinking Generosity. Critical Theory and the Politics of Caritas (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997), pp. 138-179.
Cooke, Maeve – “Are Ethical Conflicts Irreconcilable?”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 23, no. 2 (1997), pp. 1-19. Repr. in Iain MacKenzie & Shane O'Neill (eds.), Reconstituting Social Criticism. Political Morality in an Age of Scepticism (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999), pp. 171-189.
Cooke, Maeve – “Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition”, Political Theory, vol. 25, no. 2 (1997), pp. 258-288.
Corredor, Christina – “Framework of an Intersubjectivist Theory of Meaning”, Sorites, no. 8 (1997), pp. 33-60.
Dahms, Harry F. – “Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukács and Habermas”, Sociological Theory, vol. 15, no. 3 (1997), pp. 181-214. Repr. in Harry F. Dahms, The Vitality of Critical Theory (Bingley: Emerald, 2011), pp. 45-92.
Davey, Nicholas – “Nietzsche and Habermas on Objectivity”, New Nietzsche Studies, vol. 2, no. 1-2 (1997), pp. 61-83.
Delanty, Gerald – “Communication and Reconstruction: Habermas, Apel, and the Search for a Synthesis”, in Gerald Delanty, Social Science. Beyond Constructivism and Realism (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997), pp. 77-94.
Delanty, Gerald – “Habermas and Occidental Rationalism: The Politics of Identity, Social Learning, and the Cultural Limits of Moral Universalism”, Sociological Theory, vol. 15, no. 1 (1997), pp. 30-59.
Dodd, Nigel – “Habermas, Jürgen: Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 48, no. 2 (1997), pp. 329-330.
Dyzenhaus, David – “Habermas on the Democratic Form of Law”, in David Dyzenhaus, Legality and Legitimacy. Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), pp. 235-246.
Ebeling, Hans – “Habermas und die Idee des ewigen Friedes: Die Unsterblichen und ihr Weltbürgerrecht”, Logos, vol. 4, no. 2 (1997), pp. 83-95. Repr. in Hans Ebeling, Vom Einen des Friedens. Über Krieg und Gerechtigkeit (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1997), pp. 47-58.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Jarle Weigård – “Conceptualizing Politics: Strategic or Communicative Action?”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 20, no. 3 (1997), pp. 219-241.
Faundez, Julio – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Democratization, vol. 4, no. 3 (1997), p. 198-199.
Ferrer, Martin – Handlung und Kritik. Die Philosophie von Habermas (Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 1997).
Festenstein, Matthew – “Pragmatism and Discourse Theory” + “Practical Discourses” + “Discursive Democracy”, in Matthew Festenstein, Pragmatism and Political Theory: From Dewey to Rorty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 146-169.
Fischer, Norman – “Jürgen Habermas's Recent Philosophy of Law, and the Optimum Point between Abstract Universalism and Communitarianism”, in Stephen M. Griffin & Robert C. L. Moffat (eds.), Radical Critiques of the Law (Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 1997), pp. 67-82.
Fleming, Marie – Emancipation and Illusion: Rationality and Gender in Habermas's Theory of Modernity (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997).
Fleming, Marie – “Critical Theory Between Modernity and Postmodernity”, Philosophy Today, vol. 41, no. 1 (1997), pp. 31-39.
Forrester, Duncan B. – “Communication, Gender and Justice”, in Duncan B. Forrester, Christian Justice and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 165-192.
Frie, Roger – “Jacques Lacan and Jürgen Habermas: From Subjectivity to Intersubjective Speech”, in Roger Frie, Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Modern Philosophy and Psychoanalysis (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), pp. 159-196. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. IV (London Sage, 2009), pp. 3-32.
Fusfield, William – “Communication without Constellation? Habermas's Argumentative Turn in (and Away from) Critical Theory”, Communication Theory, vol. 7, no. 4 (1997), pp. 301-320.
Gallagher, Shaun – “Hegel, Foucault, and Critical Hermeneutics”, in Shaun Gallagher (ed.), Hegel, History, and Interpretation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 145-166.
Gamwell, Franklin I. – “Habermas and Apel on Communicative Ethics”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 23, no. 2 (1997), pp. 21- 45.
Gerhards, Jürgen – “Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit. Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialphychologie, vol. 49, no. 1 (1997) pp. 1-34.
Gibbons, Michael T. – “Democracy's Deliberations” [Book review: Between Facts and Norms], Theory & Event, vol. 1, no. 1 (1997).
Gibbs, Robert – “Asymmetry and Mutuality: Habermas and Levinas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 23, no. 6 (1997), pp. 51-63.
Glebe-Moller, Jens – “Kommunikatives Handeln, Konsens, Heiliger Geist. Zur Übersetzung theologischer in kommunikationstheoretische Kategorien”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 119-133.
Gregg, Benjamin – “Democracy in Normatively Fragmented Societies: Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], The Review of Politics, vol. 59, no. 4 (1997), pp. 927-930.
Gril, Peter – “Alexys Version einer transzendental-pragmatischen Begründung der Diskursregeln im Unterschied zu Habermas”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 83, no. 2 (1997), pp. 206-216.
Grimen, Harald – “Consensus and Normative Validity”, Inquiry, vol. 40, no. 1 (1997), pp 47-61.
Große Kracht, Hermann-Josef – “Konkurrenz oder Komplementarität? Über J. Habermas und die Religion”, Orientierung, vol. 61, no. 10 (1997), pp. 111-113.
Große Kracht, Hermann-Josef – “Öffentlichkeit und Diskurs. Jürgen Habermas als Theoretiker einer zivilgesellschaftlichen Demokratie”, in Hermann-Josef Große Kracht, Kirche in ziviler Gesellschaft. Studien zur Konfliktgeschichte von katholischer Kirche und demokratischer Öffentlichkeit (Paderdorn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 295-367.
Gudmundsen, Sandra – “On the Logic of the Social Sciences, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1 (1997), pp. 139-145.
Gudmundsen, Sandra – “The Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 27, no. 2 (1997), pp. 165-272.
Gunson, Darryl & Chik Collins – “From the "I" to the "We": Discourse Ethics, Identity, and Pragmatics of Partnership in the West of Scotland”, Communication Theory, vol. 7, no. 4 (1997), pp. 277-300.
Healy, Paul – “Between Habermas and Foucault: On the Limits and Possibilities of Critical and Emancipatory Reason”, South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 16, no. 4 (1997), pp. 140-149.
Heming, Ralf – Öffentlichkeit, Diskurs un Gesellschaft. Zum analytischen Potential und zur Kritik des Begriffs der Öffentlichkeit bei Habermas (Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1997).
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe – “Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997), pp. vii-xxiv.
Holmström, Susanne – “The Inter‐subjective and the Social Systemic Public Relations Paradigms”, Journal of Communication Management, vol. 2, no. 1 (1997), pp. 24-39.
Horster, Detlef – “Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie; Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 83, no. 2 (1997), pp. 291-295.
Howard, Dick – “Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], German Politics & Society, vol. 15, no. 1 (1997), pp. 140-147.
Hug, Detlef Matthias – “Öffentlichkeit als Dritte im Konflikt”, in Detlef Matthias Hug, Konflikte und Öffentlichkeit. Zur Rolle des Journalismus in sozialen Konflikten (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997), pp. 233-289.
Huspek, Michael – “Toward Normative Theories of Communication with Reference to the Frankfurt School: An Introduction”, Communication Theory, vol. 7, no. 4 (1997), pp. 265-276.
Jacobsson, Kerstin – “Discursive Will Formation and the Question of Legitimacy in European Politics”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 20, no. 1 (1997), pp. 69-90.
Janicaud, Dominique – “Power and Rationality. Foucault and the Habermasian Critique”, in Dominique Janicaud, Rationalities, Historicities (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1997), pp. 34-50. Revised version: “Power and Rationality. Foucault, Nietzsche, and Habermasian Critique”, in Babette E. Babich (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche, and Critical Theory (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2004), pp. pp. 281-303.
Joas, Hans – “Werte und Normen: Das Gute und das Rechte”, in Hans Joas, Die Entstehung der Werte (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1997), pp. 252-292. English: “Values and Norms: The Good and the Right”, in Hans Joas, The Genesis of Values (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000), pp. 161-185.
Junker-Kenny, Maureen – “Praxis gegenseitiger Anerkennung? Die Relevanz der philosophischen Kritik an Jürgen Habermas' Ansatz für die Entwicklung eines Begriffs christlicher Praxis”, International Journal for Practical Theology, vol. 1, no. 1 (1997), pp. 41-82.
Keul, Hans-Klaus - Kritik der emanzipatorischen Vernunft. Zum Aufklärungsbegriff der Kritische Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1997).
Kitchen, Gary – “Habermas's Moral Cognitivism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 97 (1997), pp. 317-324.
Knapp, Markus – “Die Anderen - der blinde Fleck der Moderne? Überlegungen zum Verhältnis der Theologie zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 71-96.
Korthals, Michiel – “Reconstruction and Explanation of Foundational Development”, in Woulter van Haaften, Michiel Korthals & Thomas Wren (eds.), Philosophy of Development (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997), pp. 55-74.
Kos, Elmar – “Die Lebenswelt in der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns” + “Kritische Würdigung der Habermaskonzeption”, in Elmar Kos, Verständigung oder Vermittlung? Die kommunikative Ambivalenz als Zugangsweg einer theologischen Medienethik (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1997), pp. 112-139 + 140-149.
Krause, Skadi & Karsten Malowitz – “Jürgen Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie” [Book review], Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 38, no. 2 (1997), pp. 393-395.
Krebs, Angelika – “Discourse Ethics and Nature”, Environmental Values, vol. 6, no. 3 (1997), pp. 269-279.
Kühnlein, Michael – “Wie rational ist die Struktur der Versprachlichung? Zur Kritik an der religionsphilosophischen Rezeption von Jürgen Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Alexander W. Kucera & Michael Kühnlein (eds.), Neuere Reflexionen zur Religionstheorie und religiösen Erkenntnis (Cuxhaven: Dartford, 1997), pp. 7-23.
Kulynych, Jessica J. – “Performing Politics: Foucault, Habermas, and Postmodern Participation”, Polity, vol. 30, no. 2 (1997), pp. 315-347.
LaCapra, Dominick – “Revisiting the Historians' Debate: Mourning and Genocide”, History and Memory, vol. 9, no 1/2 (1997), pp. 80-112.
Langsdorf, Lenore – “Refusing Individuality: How Human Beings are Made into Subjects”, Communication Theory, vol. 7, no. 4 (1997), pp. 321-342.
Langthaler, Rudolf – Nachmetaphysisches Denken? Kritische Anfragen an Jürgen Habermas (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1997).
Leach, Neil – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Neil Leach, Rethinking Architecture. A Reader in Cultural Theory (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 214-223.
Lee, Nick – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, J. Habermas” [Book review], Sociological Review, vol. 45 no. 2 (1997), pp. 343-345.
Leydet, Dominique – “Habermas's Decentered View of Society and the Problem of Democratic Legitimacy”, Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 1 (1997), pp. 35-48.
Lumer, Christoph – “Habermas' Diskursethik”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 51, no. 1 (1997), pp. 42-64.
Lumer, Christoph – “Motivation zu moralischem Handeln und Diskursethik”, Jean-Paul Harpes & Wolfgang Kuhlmann (eds), Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik (Münster: Lit, 1997), 5-22.
Lynch, Richard A. – “Distinguishing Between Legal and Moral Norms. A Central Problem in Habermas's "Between Facts and Norms"”, Philosophy Today, vol. 41, supplement (1997), pp. 67-72.
Maddock, Trevor H. – “Habermas, Carr and the Possibility of a Science of Education”, Interchange, vol. 28, nos. 2-3 (1997), pp. 171-182.
Mahoney, Brigid – “Jürgen Habermas, The Past as Future” [Book review], Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 51, no. 1 (1997), pp. 124-125.
Mansbridge, Jane – “Taking Coercion Seriously”, Constellations, vol. 3, no. 3 (1997), pp. 407-416.
Markell, Patchen – “Contesting Consensus: Rereading Habermas on the Public Sphere”, Constellations, vol. 3, no. 3 (1997), pp. 377-400.
Mayhew, Leon H. – “Habermas and Parsons: Critical Issues Regarding Influence”, in Leon H. Mayhew, New Public: Professional Communication and the Means of Social Influence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressm 1997), pp. 81-117.
McAdams, A. James – “Germany After the Unification. Normal at Last?” [Book review; The Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas], World Politics, vol 49, no. 2 (1997), pp. 282-308.
McCarthy, George E. – “Reason and Justice after Antiquity: Jürgen Habermas”, in George E. McCarthy, Romancing Antiquity. German Critique of the Enlightenment from Weber to Habermas (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), pp. 243-284.
McCormick, John P. – “Habermas' Discourse Theory of Law: Bridging Anglo-American and Continental Legal Traditions?” [Book review], Modern Law Review, vol. 60, no. 5 (1997), pp. 734-743.
McCormick, John P. – “Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas: The Sociology and Philosophy of Law during Crises of the State”, Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, vol. 9, no. 2 (1997), pp. 297-344.
McInerney III, Thomas F. – “Habermas, Proceduralism and the Private Cause of Action under Rule 10b-5: The Implications for Democracy”, Creighton Law Review, vol. 31, no. 3 (1997-1998), pp. 805-848.
McKerrow Raymie E. – “Jürgen Habermas, The Past as Future” [Book review], Discourse & Society, vol. 8, no. 2 (1997), pp. 271-272.
Meyer, Martin F. – “Jürgen Habermas: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen” [Book review], Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, vol. 50, no. 3 (1997), pp. 324-328.
Michelman, Frank I. – “How Can the People Ever Make the Laws? A Critique of Deliberative Democracy”, in James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 145-171. Also in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 74, no. 4 (1997), pp. 311-330. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 53-79.
Modak-Truran, Mark – “Habermas's Discourse Theory of Law and the Relationship between Law and Religion”, Capital University Law Review, vol. 26, no. 3 (1997), pp. 461-482.
Moggach, Douglas – “Hegel and Habermas”, The European Legacy, vol. 2 no. 3 (1997), pp. 550-556.
Morris, Martin – “The Paradigm Shift to Communication and the Eclipse of the Object”, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 96, no. 4 (1997), pp. 755-787.
Mouzelis, Nicos – “Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens”, Sociology, vol. 31, no. 1 (1997), pp. 111-119. Repr. in Nicos Mouzelis, Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 97-106.
Müller, Jan – “Preparing for the Political: German Intellectuals Confront the “Berlin Republic””, New German Critique, no. 72 (1997), pp. 151-176. Repr. in Howard Williams, Colin Wight & Norbert Kapferer (eds.), Political Thought and German Reunification. The New German Ideology? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 177-193.
Münz-Koenen, Inge – “Jürgen Habermas' Utopie der kommunikativen Vernunft”, in Inge Münz-Koenen, Konstruktion des Nirgendwo. Die Diskursivität des Utopischen bei Bloch, Adorno, Habermas (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997), pp. 141-200.
Newey, Glen – “Gassing and Bungling. Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], London Review of Books, vol. 19, no 9 (1997), pp, 14-15 [08-05-1997].
Nielsen, Kai – “Habermas and Foucault: How to Carry Out the Enlightenment Project”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 31 no. 1 (1997), pp. 5-21. Repr. in Kai Nielsen, Naturalism without Foundations (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1996), pp. 367-384.
Nieminen, Hannu – Communication and Democracy. Habermas, Williams and the British Case (Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1997).
Noys, Benjamin – “Communicative Unreason: Bataille and Habermas”, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 14, no. 1 (1997), pp. 59-75.
Øfsti, A. – “Gesellige Ungeselligkeit”, in Jean-Paul Harpes & Wolfgang Kuhlmann (eds), Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik (Münster: Lit, 1997), pp. 62-95.
Oliveira, Nythamar de – “Habermas on Nietzsche and Knowledge”, New Nietzsche Studies, vol. 2, no 1-2 (1997), pp. 111-120.
O'Neill, Shane – Impartiality in Context: Grounding Justice in a Pluralist World (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).
O'Neill, Shane – “Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 5 (1997), pp. 965-966.
Ott, Konrad – “Die Stärke der (Diskurs)-Ethik”, in Konrad Ott, Ipso facto. Zur ethischen Begründung normativer Implikate wissenschaftlicher Praxis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997), pp. 211-324.
Papastephanou, Marianna – “Communicative Action and Philosophical Foundations: Comments on the Apel-Habermas Debate”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 23, no. 4 (1997), pp. 41-69.
Pereppaden, Jose – “Habermas’ Philosophy of Liberation”, Journal of Dharma, vol. 22, no. 1 (1997), pp. 74-85.
Phillips, Kendall, R. – “The Past as Future, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 27, no 1 (1997), pp. 94-96.
Pickard, Dean – “Nietzsche, Emancipation, and Truth”, New Nietzsche Studies, vol. 2, no 1-2 (1997), pp. 85-109.
Ramsey, Ramsey Eric – “Communication and Eschatology: The Work of Waiting, an Ethics of Relief, and Areligious Religiosity”, Communication Theory, vol. 7, no, 4 (1997), pp. 343-361.
Reese-Schäfer, Walter – “Habermas' Diskurstheorie der Moral”, in Walter Reese-Schäfer, Grenzgötter der Moral. Der neuere europäisch-amerikanische Diskurs zur politischen Ethik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997), pp. 111-172.
Rehg, William – “Legitimacy and Deliberation in Epistemic Conceptions of Democracy: Between Habermas and Estlund”, The Modern Schoolman, vol. 74, no. 4 (1997), pp. 355-374.
Rehg, William – “Reason and Rhetoric in Habermas's Theory of Argumentation”, in Walter Jost & Michael Hyde (eds.), Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), pp. 358-377.
Reitemeyer, Ursula – “Zur praktischen Funktion der öffentlichen Bildung: Humboldt, Fichte, Habermas”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, vol. 73, no. 1 (1997), pp. 76-89.
Restorff, Matthias – Die politische Theorie von Jürgen Habermas (Marburg: Tectum Verlag, 1997).
Richardson, Henry S. – “Democratic Intentions”, in James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 349-382. Also in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 74, no. 4 (1997), pp. 285-300.
Rocco, Christopher – Tragedy and Enlightenment. Athenian Political Thought and the Dilemmas of Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).
Rorty, Richard – “Justice as a Larger Loyalty”, in Bon Bontekoe & Marietta Stepaniants (eds.), Justice and Democracy. Cross-Cultural Perspectives (Honolulu: University of Hawaii'i Press, 1997), pp. 9-22. Repr. in Pheng Cheah & Bruce Robbins, Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), pp. 45-58, in Matthew Festenstein & Simon Thompson (eds.), Richard Rorty. Critical Dialogues (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 223-237, in Richard Rorty, Philosophy as Cultural Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 42-55, in Christopher J. Voparil & Richard J. Bernstein (eds.), The Rorty Reader (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 433-443, and in Richard Rorty, Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2021), pp. 144-158. German: “Gerechtigkeit als erweiterte Loyalität”, in Richard Rorty, Philosophie & die Zukunft (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2000), pp. 79-100, and as “Gerechtigkeit als globale Loyalität“, in Richard Rorty, Pragmatismus als Antiautoritarismus (ed. by Eduardo Mendieta) (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2023), pp. 312-337.
Roth, Klaus – “Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, in Peter Massing (ed.), Gesellschaft neu verstehen. Aktuelle Gesellschaftstheorien und Zeitdiagnosen (Schwalbach: Wochenschau-Verlag, 1997), pp. 24-54.
Rudman, Stanley – “A Communicative Ethic: Hauerwas and Habermas”, in Stanley Rudman, Concepts of Person and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp 227-256.
Salter, Michael – “Habermas's New Contribution to Legal Scholarship” [Book review; Between Facts and Norms], Journal of Law & Society, vol. 24, no. 2 (1997), pp. 285-305.
Savelsberg, Joachim J. – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], American Journal of Sociology, vol. 102, no. 6 (1997), pp. 1737-1739.
Schapp, Jan – “Metaphysisches und nachmetaphysisches Denken: Bemerkungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 83, no. 2 (1997), pp. 193-205. Repr. in Jan Schapp, Über Freiheit und Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), pp. 119-134.
Schuon, Karl Theodor – “Theorie deliberativer Demokratie. Zur Grundstruktur einer modernen Theorie politischer Institutionen”, in Carsten Schlüter-Knauer (ed.), Die Demokratie überdenken (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1997), pp. 75-89.
Shusterman, Richard – “Reason and Aesthetics between Modernity and Postmodernity, Habermas and Rorty”, in Richard Shusterman, Practicing Philosophy. Pragmatism and the Philosophical Life (New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 113-130. Repr. in Matthew Festenstein & Simon Thompson (eds.), Richard Rorty. Critical Dialogues (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 134-152, and as “Habermas, Pragmatism, and the Problem of Aesthetics”, in Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Bookman & Catherine Kemp (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism (London: Routledge, 2002), pp, 165-181.
Siller, Hermann Pius – “Das Unbewältigbare ausdrücklich machen. Zu einer Pragmatik des Geheimnisses”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 179-196.
Skirbekk, Gunnar – “The Discourse Principle and Those Affected”, Inquiry, vol. 40, no. 1 (1997), pp. 63-71.
Smith, Nicholas H. – “Strong Hermeneutics and Discourse Ethics”, in Nicholas H. Smith, Strong Hermeneutics. Contingency and Moral Identity (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1997), pp. 121-147.
Sölter, Arpad A. – “Die Einbeziehung des Fremden. Reflexionen zur kulturellen Fremdheit bei Simmel, Habermas und Huntington”, in Ingo Breuer & Arpad A. Sölter, Der fremde Blick. Perspektiven interkultureller Kommunikation und Hermeneutik (Bosen: Sturzflüge, 1997), pp. 25-51.
Stone, Brad Lowell – “Classical Liberalism and Sociology” [Book review; Between Facts and Norms], Sociological Forum, vol. 12, no. 3 (1997), pp. 497-512.
Sweetman, Brendan – “Habermas, Jürgen: Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 51, no. 1 (1997), pp. 153-155.
Tarifa, Fatos – “The Language Paradigm in Contemporary Social Theory: Marx, Habermas, and Bourdieu in Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Social Sciences vol. 1, no. 4 (1997), pp.245-253.
Tate, John W. – “Kant, Habermas, and the "Philosophical Legitimation" of Modernity”, Journal of European Studies, vol. 27, no. 3 (1997), pp. 281-322.
Theobald, Christoph – “Glauben im "modus conversationis". Zum Ansatz einer theologischen Theorie der Moderne”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 33-70.
Thielemann, Ulrich – “Die Differenz von Diskurs- und Vertragsethik und die kategorialen Voraussetzungen ideologiekritischer Wirtschaftsethik”, in Jean-Paul Harpes & Wolfgang Kuhlmann (eds), Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik (Münster: Lit, 1997), pp. 271-312.
Thoma, Gaston – “Demokratie, Moral und Realpolitik”, in Jean-Paul Harpes & Wolfgang Kuhlmann (eds), Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik (Münster: Lit, 1997), pp. 351-362.
Tschentscher, Axel – “The Function of Procedural Justice in Theories of Justice”, in Klaus F. Röhl & Stefan Machura (eds.), Procedural Justice (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997), pp. 105-119.
Tubbs, Nigel – “Dialectic of enlightenment”, in Nigel Tubbs, Contradiction of Enlightenment. Hegel and the Broken Middle (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997), pp. 121-146.
Tucker Jr., Kenneth H. – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Sociological Inquiry, vol. 67, no. 3 (1997), pp. 383-385.
Tuomela, Raimo – “Kommunikatives Handeln und kooperative Ziele”, Analyse und Kritik, vol. 19, no. 2 (1997), pp. 153-172. English: “Collective Goals and Communicative Action”, Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 27 (2002), pp. 29-64. Repr. in Raimo Tuomela, Raul Hakli & Pekka Mäkelä (eds.), Social Ontology in the Making (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2020), pp. 173-212.
Turner, Charles – “Civil Society or Constitutional Patriotism?”, Democratization, vol. 4, no. 1 (1997), pp. 115-131. Repr. in Robert Fine & Shirin Rai (eds.), Civil Society. Democratic Perspectives (London: Frank Cass, 1997), pp. 115-131.
Ulfig, Alexander – “Lebenswelt und Diskurs”, in Alexander Ulfig, Lebenwelt – Reflexion – Sprache. Zur reflexiven Thematisierung der Lebenswelt in Phänomenologie, Existenzialontologie und Diskurstheorie (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1997), pp. 146-196.
Ulrich, Peter – “Diskursethik” + “Deliberative Politik: Die kritische Öffentlichkeit als Ort wirtschaftsbürgerliche Mitverantwortung”, in Peter Ulrich, Integrative Wirtschaftsethik (Bern: Haupt, 1997), pp. 78-95 + 305-319. English: “Discourse ethics” + “Deliberative politics: the public sphere as the site of economic citizens’ shared responsibility”, in Peter Ulrich, Integrative Economic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 62-78 + 288-302.
Vetlesen, Arne Johan – “Worlds apart? Habermas and Levinas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 23, no. 1 (1997), pp. 1-20.
Vogel, Steven – “Habermas and the Ethics of Nature”, in Roger S. Gottleib (ed.), The Ecological Community (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 175-192.
Vogt, Peter – “Habermas, Jürgen; Vom sinnlichen Eindruck zum symbolischen Ausdruck” [Book review], Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 44, no. 6 (1997), p. 566.
Wallgren, Thomas – “Varieties of Enlightenment Optimism. Discourse Ethics and Wittgensteinian Particularism in Conversation”, in Lilli Alanen, Sara Heinämaa & Thomas Wallgren (eds.), Commonality and Particularity in Ethics (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997), pp 306-342.
Waschkuhn, Arno – “Habermas: "Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit" + "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns"”, in Theo Stammen, Gisela Riescher & Wilhelm Hofmann (eds.), Hauptwerke der politischen Theorie (Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner, 1997), pp. 167-175.
Wellen, Richard – “The Modernization of Political Reason: Reflections on Habermas”, in Richard Wellen, Dilemmas in Liberal Democratic Thought since Max Weber (New York: Peter Lang, 1996), pp. 83-110.
Welsch, Wolfgang & Mike Sandbothe – “Postmodernity as a Philosophical Concept”, in Hans Bertens & Douwe W. Fokkema (eds.), International Postmodernism (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1997), pp. 75-87.
Wenzel, Uwe Justus – “Habermas als Essayist” [Book review; Vom sinnliche Eindruck], Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 11-01-1997.
Wessely, Anna – “Jürgen Habermas: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen” [Book review], Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 49, no. 4 (1997), pp. 799-801.
Wohlmuth, Josef – “Bilderverbot. Theologische Ästhetik und die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Edmund Arens (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1997), pp. 97-118. Repr. as “Theologische Ästhetik und die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns – Im Gespräch mit Jürgen Habermas”, in Josef Wohlmuth, An der Schwelle zum Heiligtum (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2007), pp. 139-160.
Woodiwiss, Anthony – “Against "Modernity": A Dissident Rant”, Economy and Society, vol. 26, no. 1 (1997), pp. 1-21.
Zima, Peter V. – “Erkenntnistheorie III: Lyotard vs. Habermas”, in Peter V. Zima, Moderne/Postmoderne. Gesellschaft, Philosophie, Literatur (Tübingen: Francke, 1997), pp. 176-195. English: Epistemology III: Lyotard vs. Habermas, in Peter V. Zima, Modern/Postmodern. Society, Philosophy, Literature (London: Continuum, 2010), pp. 103-114.
1998
Abbinnett, Ross – “Habermas and the Ethics of Communication”, in Ross Abbinnett, Truth and Social Science. From Hegel to Deconstruction (London: Sage, 1998), pp. 93-110.
Afrasiabi, Kavel L. – “Communicative Theory and Theology: A Reconsideration”, The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 91, no. 1 (1998), pp. 75-87.
Agger, Ben – “Habermas's Communication Theory”, in Ben Agger, Critical Social Theories (Boulder: Westview Press, 1998), pp. 93-98.
Apel, Karl-Otto – “Auflösung der Diskursethik? Zur Architektonik der Diskursdifferenzierung in Habermas' "Faktizität und Geltung". Dritter, transzendentalpragmatisch orientierter Versuch, mit Habermas gegen Habermas zu denken”, in Karl-Otto Apel, Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 727-838. Repr. in René von Schomberg & Peter Niesen (eds.), Zwischen Recht und Moral. Neuere Ansätze der Rechts- und Demokratietheorie (Münster: Lit, 2002), pp. 61-175.
Arens, Edmund – “Vom Kult zum Konsens. Das Religionsverständnis der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Hartmann Tyrell, Volkhard Krech & Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Religion als Kommunikation (Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 1998), pp. 241-272.
Ashenden, Samantha – “Pluralism Within the Limits of Reason Alone? Habermas and the Discursive Negotiation of Consensus”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 3 (1998), pp. 117-136. Repr. in Richard Bellamy & Martin Hollis (eds.), Pluralism and Liberal Neutrality (New York: Routledge, 1999), pp. 117-136.
Atkinson, Logan – “Coming to Term with Procedure: The Potential of the Ideal Speech Situation for Michael Walzer's Communitarian Justice”, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, vol. 56, no. 2 (1998), pp. 223-250.
Baert, Patrick – “The Spread of Reason: Habermas's Critical Theory and Beyond”, in Patrick Baert, Social Theory in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), pp. 134-152. [2nd ed. 2010: pp. 215-246]
Baynes, Kenneth – “Habermas, Jürgen (1929-)”, in Edward Craig (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. IV (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 193-200.
Bender, Christiane – “Macht - eine von Habermas und Luhmann vergessene Kategorie?”, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, vol. 23, no. 1 (1998), pp. 3-19.
Blanke, Thomas – “Die praktische Bedeutung der kommunikativen Rechtstheorie oder: Der Preis des Rechtsfortschritts”, in Michael Buckmiller & Joachim Perels (eds.), Opposition als Triebkraft der Demokratie. Bilanz und Perspektiven der zweiten Republik. Jürgen Seifert zum 70. Geburtstag (Hannover: Offizin, 1998), pp. 335-347.
Bonacker, Thorsten – “Die Zweideutigkeit der Demokratie: zur Macht- und Herrschaftsproblematik bei Jürgen Habermas und Jean-Francois Lyotard”, in Peter Imbusch (ed.), Macht und Herrschaft (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1998), pp. 199-219.
Brooke, John L. – “Reason and Passion in the Public Sphere: Habermas and the Cultural Historians” [Book review; Between Facts and Norms], The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 19, 1 (1998), pp. 43-67.
Burgett, Bruce – “United States Liberalism and the Public Sphere”, in Bruce Burgett, Sentimental Bodies: Sex, Gender, and Citizenship in the Early Republic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 27-54.
Chambers, Simone – “Contract or Conversation: Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis”, Politics and Society, vol. 26, no. 1 (1998), pp. 143-172.
Chriss, James J. – “Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Theory and Society, vol. 27, no. 3 (1998), pp. 417-425.
Christodoulidis, Emilios A. – “Habermas on the "Interpenetration" of Law and Politics”, in Emilios A Christodoulidis, Law and Reflexive Politics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998), pp. 19-30
Collier, Jane – “Theorising the Ethical Organization”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 8, bo. 4 (1998), pp. 621-654.
Cooke, Maeve – “Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Communication (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 1-19.
Cordell, Karl – “Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic” [Book review], Contemporary Politics, vol. 4, no. 4 (1998), pp. 459-461.
Cronin, Ciaran & Pablo de Greiff – “Editors' Introduction”, in Jürgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998), pp. vii-xxxii.
Crook, Stephen – “Minotaurs and other Monsters: "Everyday Life" in Recent Social Theory”, Sociology, vol. 32, no. 3 (1998), pp. 523-540. Repr. in Ben Highmore (ed), Everyday Life. Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies, vol. III (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 254-272.
Crossley, Nick – “Emotion and Communicative Action: Habermas, Linguistic Philosophy and Existentialism”, in Gillian Bendelow & Simon J Williams (ed.), Emotions in Social Life (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 16-38.
Dahms, Harry – “Beyond the Carousel of Reification”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 18 (1998), pp. 3-62. Repr. in Harry F. Dahms, The Vitality of Critical Theory (Bingley: Emerald, 2011), pp.93-154.
De Souza, Nigel – “Models of Moral Philosophy: Charles Taylor's Critique of Jürgen Habermas”, Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 1 (1998), pp. 55-78.
Doody, John – “Fichte, Habermas, and Luc Ferry”, in Lenore Langsdorf, Stephen H. Watson & Karen A. Smith (eds.), Reinterpreting the Political. Continental Philosophy and Political Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998), pp. 141-154.
Eckhoff, Rolf – “Jürgen Habermas: Diskurs als Mittel zur Begründung gerechter Prinzipien”, in Rolf Eckhoff, Rechtsanwendungsgleichheit im Steuerrecht (Köln: Schmidt, 1999), pp. 219-241.
Endreß, Martin – “Max Weber zwischen Immanuel Kant und Jürgen Habermas: Kontexte und Probleme der Unterscheidung von Gesinnungs- und Verantwortungsethik”, in Agathe Bienfait & Gerhard Wagner (eds.), Verantwortliches Handeln in gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 35-68.
Engel, Sabine – Das universale System der Personalpronomina. Das Fundament für Habermas' normative Begründung der menschlichen Vernunft? (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1998).
Eribon, Didier – “Die Ungeduld der Freiheit (Foucault und Habermas)”, in Didier Eribon, Michel Foucault und seine Zeitgenossen (München: Boer, 1998), pp. 287-308.
Eze, Emmanuel C. – “Out of Africa: Communication Theory and Cultural Hegemony”, Telos, no. 111 (1998), pp. 139-161.
Falzon, Chris – “Dialogue and the Postmodern”, in Chris Falzon, Foucault and Social Dialogue. Beyond Fragmentation (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 67-83.
Finnis, John – “Natural Law and the Ethics of Discourse”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, vol. 43, no. 1 (1998), pp. 53-73. Also in Ratio Juris, vol. 12, no. 4 (1999), pp. 354-373. Repr. as “Discourse, Truth, and Friendship”, on John Finnis, Reason in Action. Collected Essays, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 41-61. German: “Das Naturrecht und die Diskursethik”, in John Finnis, Ethik, Recht und Politik. Philosophische Essays (Freiburg: Karl Alber, 2024), pp. 73-102.
Flyvbjerg, Bent – “Empowering Civil Society: Habermas, Foucault, and the Question of Conflict”, in Mike Douglass & John Friedmann (eds.), Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998), pp. 185-211.
Flyvbjerg, Bent – “Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?”, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2 (1998), pp. 210-233. Repr. in Mark Haugaard & Stewart Clegg (eds.), Power and Politics, vol. 2 (Los Angeles: Sage, 2012), pp. 117-140.
Forbath, William E. – “Habermas's Constitution: A History, Guide, and Critique” [Book review], Law and Social Inquiry, vol. 23, no. 4 (1998), pp. 969-1016.
French, Warren & David Allbright – “Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2 (1998), pp. 177-194.
Füllsack, Manfred – “Geltungsansprüche und Beobachtungen zweiter Ordnung. Wie nahe kommen sich Diskurs- und Systemtheorie?”, Soziale Systeme, vol. 4, no. 1 (1998), pp. 184-198.
Fultner, Barbara – “The Politics of Vulnerability: On the Role of Idealization in Butler and Habermas”, Philosophy Today, vol. 42, Supplement (1998), pp. 94-103. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 104-116.
Gaon, Stella – “Pluralizing Universal "Man": The Legacy of Transcendentalism and Teleology in Habermas's Discourse Ethics”, The Review of Politics, vol. 60, no. 4 (1998), pp. 685-718.
Geyer, Christian – “Unbedingtes bei Habermas – Dezentriert”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 01-07-1998.
Gimmler, Antje – Institution und Individuum: Zur Institutionentheorie von Max Weber und Jürgen Habermas (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1998)
Givsan, Hassan – “Habermas”, in Hassan Givsan, Eine bestürzende Geschichte: Warum Philosophen sich durch den "Fall Heidegger" korrumpieren lassen (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1998), pp. 18-53.
Gößling, Hans Jürgen – “Diskurs und Kompromiß: Pädagogisch-systematische Grundfragen im Anschluß an die Dikurstheorie des Rechts von Habermas”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, vol. 74, no. 2 (1998), pp. 167-180.
Gosepath, Stefan – “Das Verhältnis von Demokratie und Menschenrecht”, in Hauke Brunkhorst (ed.), Demokratischer Experimentalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 201-240.
Graneß, Anke – “Der Konsensbegriff. Ein Vergleich der Bedeutung des Konsensbegriffs in der Konsensethik von Kwadi Wiredu und der Diskursethik von Karl-Otto Apel und Jürgen Habermas”, Polylog. Zeitschrift für interkulturelles Philosophierens, no. 2 (1998), pp. 22-31.
Gril, Peter - Die Möglichkeit praktischer Erkenntnis aus Sicht der Diskurstheorie: Eine Untersuchung zu Jürgen Habermas und Robert Alexy (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1998).
Gröbl-Steinbach, Evelyn – “Die pragmatische Wende”, in Volker Gadenne (ed.), Kritischer Rationalismus und Pragmatismus (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998), pp. 113-142.
Hahne, Anton – “Kommunikation als idealisierter Dialog”, in Anton Hahne, Kommunikation in der Organisation. Grundlagen und Analyse - ein kritischer Überblick (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998), pp. 140-163.
Han, Sang-Jin – (ed.) Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998).
|
Habermas and the Korean Debate
|
Han, Sang-Jin – “What does a Critique of Ideology Mean Today?”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 19-46.
Han, Sang-Jin – “Four Critical Issues of the Korean Unification: An Extrapolation of Habermas' Lecture”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 138-159.
Han, Sang-Jin – “Habermas' Critical Theory and Discursive Social Science”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 216-241.
Han, Sang-Jin – “Three Tasks of Critical Theory and Korean Development”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 289-315.
Harrington, Austin – “Habermas' Concept of the Lifeworld. A Defense”, Social Philosophy Today, vol. 13 (1998), pp. 39-53 (= Yeager Hudson (ed.), Technology, Morality and Social Policy (Lewiston: Mellen Press, 1998.]
Healy, Paul – “Dialogue Across Boundaries: On the Discursive Conditions Necessary for a "Politics of Equal Recognition"”, Res Publica, vol. 4, no. 1 (1998), pp. 59-76.
Heath, Joseph – “What is a Validity Claim?”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 24, no. 4 (1998), pp. 23-41. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 285-302.
Hennig, Eike – “Das Ausklammern des Sozialen und der Einbezug des Anderen. Jürgen Habermas über Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Staatsbürgerschaft”, Vorgänge, no. 141 (1998), pp. 73-80.
Heysse, Tim – “Freedom, Transparency and the Public Sphere. A Philosophical Analysis”, Javnost - The Public, vol. 5, no. 4 (1998), pp. 5-18.
Hoffmann, Stanley – “A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Foreign Affairs, vol. 77, no. 3 (1998), p. 142.
Hohmann, Hanns – “Rhetoric in the Public Sphere and the Discourse of Law and Democracy” [Book review; Between Facts and Norms], Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 84, no. 3 (1998), pp. 358-370.
Holz, Klaus – “Begründungslogische Evolutionstheorie. Bemerkungen zur "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns"”, in Frank Welz & Uwe Weisenbacher (eds.), Soziologische Theorie und Geschichte (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998), pp. 218-232.
Horowitz, Asher – “"Like a Tangled Mobile": Reason and Reification in the Quasi-dialectical Theory of Jürgen Habermas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 24, no. 1 (1998), pp. 1-23.
Horster, Detlef – “Zwei Philosophen, die sich dreißig Jahre lang aneinander rieben”, Frankfurter Rundschau, 21-11-1998. Also published as “Die Auseinandersetzung mit Niklas Luhmann 1971”, in Detlef Horster, Jürgen Habermas zur Einführung (Hamburg: Junius, 1999), pp. 32-44.
Huttunen, Rauno & Hannu l. T. Heikkinen – “Between Facts and Norms: Action Research in the Light of Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action and Discourse Theory of Justice”, Curriculum Studies, vol. 6, no. 3 (1998), pp. 307-322.
Hwang, Tai-Youn – “Habermas' Critical Theory and Another Marx Unveiled: A Confrontation with Habermas' Communicative ‘Critical Theory of Society’”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 82-99.
Iser, Matthias – “Habermas on Virtue”, The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 6 (1998), pp. 148-154.
Jacobson, Thomas L. – “Discourse Ethics and the Right to Communicate”, International Communication Gazette, vol.60, no. 5 (1998), pp. 395-413.
Jensen, Uffa – “Ein Ritterschlag zum Lehrmeister? Die Apotheose des Daniel J. Goldhagen in der Laudatio von Jürgen Habermas”, in Johannes Heil & Rainer Erb (eds.), Geschichtswissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit. Der Streit um Daniel J. Goldhagen (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1998), pp. 148-165.
Johnson, Pauline – “Carl Schmitt, Jürgen Habermas, and the Crisis of Politics”, The European Legacy, vol. 3, no. 6 (1998), pp. 15-32.
Junker-Kenny, Maureen – Argumentationsethik und christliche Praxis. Eine praktisch-theologische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1998).
Kachur, Jerrold L. – “Habermas's "Theory of Communicative Action" and Siebren Miedema, Part One: The Ideological Context for Intellectual Appropriation”, Interchange, vol. 29, no. 2 (1998), pp. 207-223.
Kachur, Jerrold L. – “Habermas's "Theory of Communicative Action" and Siebren Miedema, Part Two: An Ideology Critique of Intellectual Appropriation”, Interchange, vol. 29, no. 3 (1998), pp. 275-285.
Katindoy, Karl M. – “Notes on Jürgen Habermas' Participation in the Historians' Debate”, Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture [Manila], vol. 2, no. 3 (1998), pp. 169-195.
Kaube, Jürgen – “Blind für blaue Blumen. Jürgen Habermas sucht neue Gegner” [Book review; Die postnationale Konstellation], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 06-10-1998.
Kavoulakos, K. – “Nature, Science and Technology in Habermas”, Democracy and Nature, vol. 4, no. 1 (1998), pp. 112-145.
Kiros, Teodros – “The Analysis of Power: Foucault and Habermas”, in Teodros Kiros, Self-construction and the Formation of Human Values. Truth, Language, and Desire (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1998), pp. 1-36.
Knell, Sebastian – “Dreifache Kontexttranszendenz. Variationen über ein universalistisches Motiv”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 46, no. 4 (1998), pp. 563-581.
Koller, Peter – “Jürgen Habermas über Moral, Staat und Politik. Anmerkungen zu "Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie"”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 52, no. 2 (1998), pp. 257-267.
Köveker, Dietmar – “Verrechtlichung als "Transzendenz von innen"? Die wahrheitstheoretischen Grundlagen von Habermas' Rechtsphilosophie im Licht konkurrierender Kantdeutungen”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 84, no. 4 (1998), pp. 471-488.
Kraushaar, Wolfgang – Frankfurter Schule und Studenterbewegung (Hamburg: Rogner & Bernhard, 1998).
Krogh, Thomas – “The Communicative Theory”, in Thomas Krogh, Technology and Rationality (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 97-194.
Kupka, Thomas – “Demokratie ohne Naturrecht. Eine rechtsphilosophische Entwicklungsskizze in vier Schritten und einem Ausblick”, in Hauke Brunkhorst (ed.), Demokratischer Experimentalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 241-278.
Lafont, Cristina – “Pluralism and Universalism in Discourse Ethics”, in Amós Nascimento (ed.), A Matter of Discourse. Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 55-78.
Lara, Maria Pia – Moral Textures. Feminist Narratives in the Public Sphere (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).
Lassman, Peter – “A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], German Politics, vol. 7, no. 2 (1998), pp. 226-227.
Leet, Martin – “Jürgen Habermas and Deliberative Democracy”, in April Carter & Geoffrey Stokes (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998) pp. 77-97.
Linklater, Andrew – “The Dialogical Ethic and the Transformation of Political Community” + “The Modes of Exclusion and the Boundaries of Community”, in Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community. Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), pp. 77-108, 109-144.
Lohmann, Georg – “Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie ohne Geschichtsphilosophie? Zu Jürgen Habermas' verabschiedeter und uneingestandener Geschichtsphilosophie”, in Frank Welz & Uwe Weisenbacher (eds.), Soziologische Theorie und Geschichte (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998), pp. 197-217.
Luckner, Andreas – “Ethik- oder Moralprimat? Ein Universalienstreit” [Book review; Die Einbeziehung des Anderen], Philosophische Rundschau, vol. 45, no. 2 (1998), pp. 113-128.
Maindok, Herlinde – “Habermas: Theorie kommunikativen Handelns”, in Herlinde Maindok, Einführung in die Soziologie (München: Oldenburg, 1998), pp. 118-138.
McCarthy, Thomas – “Habermas”, in S. Critchley & W. R. Schroeder (eds.), A Companion to Continental Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 397-406.
McGee, Michael Calvin – “Phronesis in the Gadamer Versus Habermas Debates”, in John M. Sloop & James P. McDaniel (eds.), Judgment Calls. Rhetoric, Politics, and Indeterminacy (New York: Routledge, 1998), pp.13-41.
Mendonca, Wilson P. – “Are Moral Concerns Irreducible to Ethical Concerns? Habermas and the Cognitive Content of Morality”, in Amós Nascimento (ed.), A Matter of Discourse. Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), 79-106.
Meynell, Hugo A. – “An Unstable Compromise: Habermas”, in Hugo A. Meynell, Redirecting Philosophy. Reflections of the Nature of Knowledge from Plato to Lonergan (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998), pp. 222-240.
Mitchell, Timothy – “Nationalism, Imperialism, Economism: A Comment on Habermas”, Public Culture, vol. 10, no. 2 (1998), pp. 417-424.
Morris, Martin – “Capitalist Society and Its Real Abstractions: The Critique of Reification in Habermas's Social Theory”, Rethinking Marxism, vol. 10, no. 2 (1998), pp. 27-50.
Morrow, Raymond A. & Calos Alberto Torres – “Paulo Freire, Jürgen Habermas and Critical Pedagogy: Implications for Comparative Education”, Melbourne Studies in Education, vol. 39, no. 2 (1998), pp. 1-20.
Navasky, Victor – “Scoping Out Habermas”, in Everette E. Dennis & Robert W. Snyder (eds.), Media & Democracy (New Brunswick: Transaction, 1998), pp. 111-118.
Niehaus, M. – “Das bessere Argument. Eine Anmerkung zur Logik des Argumentierens bei Jürgen Habermas”, Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 105, no. 2 (1998), pp. 412-422.
Nordquist, Joan – Jürgen Habermas (III): A Bibliography (Santa Cruz: Reference & Research, 1998).
Nussbaum, Charles – “Habermas on Speech Acts: A Naturalistic Critique”, Philosophy Today, vol. 42, no. 2 (1998), pp. 126-145.
Nuyen, A T. – “The Politics of Emancipation: From Self to Society”, Human Studies, vol. 21, no. 1 (1998), pp. 27-43.
Outhwaite, William – “Discourse Ethics”, in Ruth Chadwick (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. 3 (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998), pp. 3518-3534. [2nd ed. 2012, vol. 4, pp. 826-832]
Ollig, Hans-Ludwig – “Habermas und das Religionsproblem”, Theologie und Philosophie, vol. 73, no. 4 (1998), pp. 558-577.
Olson, Kevin – “Democratic Inequalities: The Problem of Equal Citizenship in Habermas's Democratic Theory”, Constellations, vol. 5, no. 2 (1998), pp. 215-233.
Ott, K. – “Habermas”, in Julian Nida-Rümelin (ed.), Ästhetik und Kunstphilosophie. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart in Einzeldarstellungen (Stuttgart: Kröner, 1998), pp. 344-351.
Ott, Konrad – “Über den Theoriekern und einige intendierte Anwendungen der Diskursethik. Eine strukturalistische Perspektive”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 52, no. 2 (1998), pp. 268-291.
Outhwaite, William – “Habermas”, in Rob Stones, Key Sociological Thinkers (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 205-214.
Outhwaite, William – “Habermas: Modernity as Reflection”, in Bryan Cheyette & Laura Marcus (eds.), Modernity, Culture, and "the Jew" (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), pp. 157-170.
Owen, David S. – “Habermas' Development Logic Theses: Universal or Eurocentric”, Philosophy Today, vol. 42, Supplement (1998), pp. 104-111. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 238-248. Expanded version: “The Developmental Logic Thesis”, in David S. Owen, Between Reason and History. Habermas and the Idea of Progress (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), pp. 130-172.
Paik, Nak-Chung – “Habermas on National Unification in Germany and Korea”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 160-171.
Palti, Elias José – “Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms” [Book review]. Thesis Eleven, no. 54 (1998), pp. 117-122.
Palti, Elias José – “Patroklos's Funeral and Habermas's Sentence” [Book review: Between Facts and Norms], Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 23, no. 4 (1998), pp. 1017-1044
Park, Young-Do – “Insights and Deficiency of Habermas' Discursive Grammar of Critique: For a Stronger Dialectic of Critique”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 47-81.
Pensky, Max – “The Limits of Solidarity. Habermas, Levinas, and the Moral Point of View”, in Amós Nascimento (ed.), A Matter of Discourse. Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 129-149.
Rasmussen, David M. – “Liberalism Reconsidered” [Book review; Between Facts and Norms], First Thing, no. 82 (April 1998), pp. 52-55.
Reich, Kersten – “Konstruktionen: Sprechakte und kommunikatives Handeln (Habermas)”, in Kersten Reich, Die Ordnung der Blicke. Perspektiven des interaktionistischen Konstruktivismus (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1998), pp. 288-312.
Requejo, Ferran – “European Citizenship in Plurinational States - Some Limits of Traditional Democratic Theories: Rawls and Habermas”, in Ulrich Preuß & Ferran Requejo (eds.), European Citizenship, Multiculturalism, and the State (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998), pp. 29-50.
Roberts, Ian – “Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Sociology, vol. 32, no. 2 (1998), pp. 413-415.
Roberts, Patricia – “Habermas's Rational-Critical Sphere and the Problem of Criteria”, in Michael Bernard-Donals & Richard R. Glejzer (eds.), Rhetoric in an Antifoundational World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), pp. 170-194.
Roest, H. de – Communicative Identity: Habermas' Perspectives of Discourse as a Support for Practical Theology (Kampen: Kok, 1998).
Rosenfeld, Michel – “A Pluralist Critique of Contractarian Proceduralism”, Ratio Juris, vol. 11, no. 4 (1998), pp. 291-319.
Rosenfeld, Michel - “Overcoming Interpretation through Dialogue: A Critical if Habermas's Proceduralist Conception of Justice”, in Michel Rosenfeld, Just Interpretations. Law between Ethics and Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 114-149.
Rosenfeld, Michel & Andrew Arato – (ed.) Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998). [Reprints from Cardozo Law Review, vol. 17, no. 4-5 (1996)]
|
Habermas on Law and Democracy
|
Rostbøll, Christian F. – Human Rights, Popular Sovereignty and Freedom (Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 1998).
Ryan, Alan – “In a Conversational Idiom”, Social Research, vol. 65, no. 3 (1998), pp. 473-489.
Ryu, Honglim – “Justifying Discourse Ethics in the Public Sphere”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 242-270.
Sacchi, Stefan – “Modernisierung und Legitimation bei Habermas”, in Stefan Sacchi, Politische Potentiale in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1998), pp. 35-96.
Sander, Uwe – “Mediatisierte Kommunikation bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Uwe Sander, Die Bindung der Unverbindlichkeit. Mediatisierte Kommunikation in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 99-106.
Sarcinelli, Ulrich – “Repräsentation oder Diskurs”, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, vol. 8, no. 2 (1998), pp. 547-567.
Schadel, Erwin – “Habermas' Rekurs auf die Kantische Vernunfttrias”, in Erwin Schadel, Kants "Tantalischer Schmertz". Versuch einer konstruktiven Kritizismus-Kritik in ontotriadischer Perspektive (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1998), pp. 465-536.
Schmidt, Thomas E. – “Habermas & Schröder - Schröder & Habermas”, Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 45, no. 11 (1998), pp. 973-977.
Schneider, Norbert – “Erkenntniskritik als Gesellschaftskritik. Jürgen Habermas”, in Norbert Schneider, Erkenntnistheorie im 20. Jahrhundert. Klassische Positionen (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1998), pp. 209-218.
Schüle, Christian – Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei Carl Schmitt und Jürgen Habermas (Neuried: Ars Una, 1998).
Schwinn, Thomas – “False Connections: Systems and Action Theories in Neofunctionalism and in Jürgen Habermas”, Sociological Theory, vol. 16, no. 1 (1998), pp. 75-95. German: Revised version: “Nichtintendierte Folgen als Struktur oder System. Konstruktionsprobleme im Neofunktionalismus und bei Jürgen Habermas”, Rainer Greshoff, Georg Kneer & Uwe Schimank (eds.), Die Transintentionalität des Sozialen. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung klassischer und moderner Sozialtheorien (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. 2003), pp. 278-302, and in Thomas Schwinn, Max Weber und die Systemtheorie. Studien zu einer handlungstheoretischen Makrosoziologie (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2013), pp. 172-198.
Shim, Young-Hee – “The Trilemma of Protection, Equality and Difference: The Relevance of Habermas for Korean Feminism”, in Sang-Jin Han (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1998), pp. 388-420.
Sitton, John F. – “Disembodied Capitalism: Habermas's Conception of the Economy”, Sociological Forum, vol. 13, no. 1 (1998), pp. 61-83.
Skollerhorn, Erland – “Habermas and Nature: The Theory of Communicative Action for Studying Environmental Policy”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 41, no. 5 (1998), pp. 555-573.
Soosten, Joachim von – “Kommunikation und Religion. Obsoleszenz und Affirmation von Religion in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas”, in Hartmann Tyrell, Volkhard Krech & Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Religion als Kommunikation (Würzburg: Ergon, 1998), pp. 273-300.
Sudarsan, P. – “Habermas and Critical Social Theory”, Indian Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2 (1998), pp. 253-266.
Summer, Ludwig – “Der Diskurs als Begründung und Form ethischer Verantwortlichkeit: Jürgen Habermas”, in Ludwig Summer, Der unternehmensethische Begriff der "Verantwortung". Eine Grundlegung im Anschluß an Jonas, Kant und Habermas (Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1998), pp. 111-145.
Taylor, Charles – “Taylor's Response”, Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 1 (1998), pp. 79-87.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. & P. Allmendinger – “Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 30, no. 11 (1998), pp. 1975-1989.
Thompson, Janna – “Discourse Ethics and the Critique of Monology”, in Janna Thompson, Discourse and Knowledge. Defence of a Collectivist Ethics (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 32-45.
Thyen, Anke – “Was bedeutet: Autonomie der Moral?”, in K. Graf Ballestrem et al. (eds.), Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch 1998 (Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1998), pp. 109-125.
Trey, George - Solidarity and Difference. The Politics of Enlightenment in the Aftermath of Modernity (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998).
Velasco Arroyo, Juan Carlos – “Politische Dissidenz und partizipative Demokratie. Zur Rolle des zivilen Ungehorsams heute”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 84, no. 1 (1998), pp. 87-104.
Vogelsang, Frank – “Der Diskurs als sozialethische Methode”, in Frank Vogelsang, Ingenieurethik. Ein Ansatz aus theologischer Perspektive (Münster: Lit, 1998). pp. 204-269.
Wallace, Andy – “Habermas, Jürgen: Between Facts and Norms” [Book review], Ethics, vol. 108, no. 3 (1998), pp. 622-625.
Waschkuhn, Arno – “Partizipatorische Demokratie – normativ und empirisch”, in Arno Waschkuhn, Demokratietheorien. Politiktheoretische und ideengeschichtliche Grundzüge (München: R. Oldenbourg, 1998), pp. 58-71.
Wellmer, Albrecht – “Menschenrechte und Demokratie”, in Georg Lohman & Stefan Gosepath (eds.), Philosophie der Menschenrechte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 265-291. English: “Democracy, Human Rights, and the Problem of a Worldwide Civil Society”, in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 359-373.
Wenzel, Uwe Justus – “Wider die Entleerung der Politik. Jürgen Habermas analysiert die "postnationale Konstellation"” [Book review], Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 06-10-1998.
Westphal, Merold – “Commanded Love and Moral Autonomy: The Kierkegaard-Habermas Debate”, Kierkegaard Studies: Yearbook 1998 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998), pp. 1-22. Also in Ethical Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 4 (1998), pp. 263-276.
Wilde, Lawrence – “Against Productivism: Habermas and Gorz”, in Lawrence Wilde, Ethical Marxism and its Radical Critics (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 77-102.
Willke, Helmut – “Im kalten Frieden der Moderne. Jürgen Habermas über die Chancen der Politik in der "postnationalen Konstellation"”, Die Zeit, 08-10-1998.
Wüstehube, Axel – “Rationalität in Transzendental- und Universalpragmatik”, in Axel Wüstehube, Rationalität und Hermeneutik. Diskursethik, pragmatischer Idealismus, philosophische Hermeneutik (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1998) pp. 37-97.
Zinkin, Melissa – “Habermas on Intelligibility”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 36, no. 3 (1998), pp. 453-472.
Zoglauer, Thomas – “Diskursethik”, in Thomas Zoglauer, Normenkonflikte. Zur Logik und Rationalität ethischen Argumentierens (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1998), pp. 229-274.
Zurbrugg, Nicholas – “Habermas…Burroughs.Beckett..Foreman (Communicative Rationality and Performative Magic)”, Performance Research, vol. 3, no. 1 (1998), pp. 58-67.
Zürcher, Markus Daniel (1998), “ Solidarität als komplementäres Prinzip der Gerechtigkeit und als verknappende gesellschaftliche Ressource”, in Markus Daniel Zürcher, Solidarität, Anerkennung und Gemeinschaft. Zur Phänomenologie, Theorie und Kritik der Solidarität (Tübingen: Francke, 1998), pp. 121-137.
1999
"Jürgen Habermas' 70. Geburtstag in den Medien"
|
12-06-1999 Hilary Putnam - Ein deutscher Dewey (Neue Zürcher Zeitung) 17-06-1999 Axel Honneth - Unser Kritiker (Die Zeit) 18-06-1999 Hans-Georg Gadamer - Der Meister der Kommunikation (Süddeutsche Zeitung) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: “Antworten auf Jürgen Habermas”:
|
Aboulafia, Mitchell – “Law Professors Read Habermas”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 943-954.
Alexy, Robert – “The Special Case Thesis”, Ratio Juris, vol. 12, no. 4 (1999), pp. 374-384.
Always, Joan – “No Body There: Habermas and Feminism”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 19 (1999), pp. 117-144.
Apel, Karl-Otto – “Zum Verhältnis von Moral, Recht und Demokratie. Eine Stellungnahme zu Habermas' Rechtphilosophie aus transzendentalpragmatischer Sicht”, in Peter Siller & Bertram Keller, Rechtsphilosophische Kontroversen der Gegenwart (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999), pp. 27-40. English: Revised version: “Regarding the Relationship of Morality, Law and Democracy. On Habermas' Philosophy of Law from a Transzendental-pragmatic Point of View”, in Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Bookman & Catherine Kemp (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 17-30. Repr. in Invenio: Revista de investigación académica, no. 15 (2005), pp. 11-24.
Ashenden, Samantha & David Owen – (eds.) Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999).
|
Foucault contra Habermas
|
Ashenden, Samantha – “Habermas on Discursive Consensus: Rethinking the Welfare State in the Face of Cultural Pluralism”, in Prue Chamberlayne et al. (eds.), Welfare and Culture in Europe. Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy (London: Jessica Kingsley, 1999), pp. 216-239.
Ashenden, Samantha – “Questions of Criticism: Habermas and Foucault on Civil Society and Resistance”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 143-165.
Ashenden, Samantha & David Owen – “Introduction”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 1-20.
Avio, Kenneth L. – “Habermasian Ethics and Institutional Law and Economics”, Kyklos, vol. 52, no. 4 (1999), pp. 511-535.
Baeten, Elizabeth M. – “Rethinking the Socially Constituted Self as the Subject of Ethical Communication”, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1 (1999), pp. 1-18.
Beer, Raphael – Zwischen Aufklärung und Optimismus. Vernunfttheorie und Gesellschaftstheorie bei Jürgen Habermas (Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999).
Benchimol, Alex – “Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic” [Book review], Thesis Eleven, no. 56 (1999), pp. 133-137.
Bienfait, Agathe – “Die verantwortungsethische Kritik an Jürgen Habermas' kognitivistischem Liberalismus”, in Agathe Bienfait, Freiheit, Verantwortung, Solidarität. Zur Rekonstruktion des politischen Liberalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), pp. 180-206.
Blanke, Thomas – “Recht und Moral im Kosovo-Krieg. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas”, Kritische Justiz, vol. 32 no. 3 (1999), pp. 410-425.
Blaug, Ricardo – Democracy, Real and Ideal: Discourse Ethics and Radical Politics (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999).
Bogen, David – Order without Rules. Critical Theory and the Logic of Conversation (Albany: The State University of New York Press, 1999).
Bohman, James – “Citizenship and Norms of Publicity. Wide Public Reason in Cosmopolitan Societies”, Political Theory, vol. 27, no. 2 (1999), pp. 176-202.
Bohman, James – “Habermas, Marxism and Social Theory: The Case for Pluralism in Critical Social Science”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 53-86.
Bohman, James – “The Politics of Modern Reason. Politics, Anti-politics and Norms in Continental Philosophy”, The Monist, vol. 82, no. 2 (1999), pp. 235-252.
Bohman, James – “Theories, Practices, and Pluralism. A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 29, no. 4 (1999), pp. 459-480.
Bookman, Mayra – “Still Facing "The Dilemma of the Fact": Gilligan and Habermas (Re)Visited”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 977-988.
Bourdieu, Pierre – “Vive le Streit!”, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 18-06-1999.
Bowie, Andrew – “German Philosophy Today: Between Idealism, Romanticism, and Pragmatism”, Philosophy: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, vol. 44 (1999), pp. 357-398 [= “German Philosophy Since Kant”, ed. by Anthony O'Hear (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)]
Brady, John – “Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic” [Book review], German Politics & Society, vol. 17, no. 2 (1999), pp. 100-105.
Brunkhorst, Hauke – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Franco Volpi (ed.), Großes Werklexikon der Philosophie, Band 1, A bis K (Stuttgart: Kröner, 1999), pp. 603-610.
Brunner, Reinhard – “Praxis und Diskurs”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 141-159.
Bubner, Rüdiger – “Über dem Boden menschlicher Dialoge” [Book review; Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung], Frankfurter Rundschau, 24-11-1999.
Burckhart, Holger & Marcel Niquet – “Diskursethik zum Verhältnis von Moral und Recht. Einige kritische Anmerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas' "Faktizität und Geltung"”, in Wolf-Dietrich Bukow & Markus Ottersbach (eds.), Die Zivilgesellschaft in der Zerreißprobe (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1999), pp. 187-200.
Callinicos, Alex – “Carrying on the Tradition: Habermas and Bourdieu”, in Alex Callinicos, Social Theory. A Historical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999), pp. 182-195.
Campbell, Margaret M. – Critical Theory and Liberation Theology. A Comparison of the Initial Work of Jürgen Habermas and Gustavo Gutiérrez (New York: Peter Lang, 1999).
Cascardi, Anthony J. – “Communication and Transformation. Aesthetics and Politics in Habermas and Arendt”, in Anthony J. Cascardi, Consequences of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 132-174.
Cohen, Joshua – “Reflections on Habermas on Democracy”, Ratio Juris, vol. 12, no. 4 (1999), pp. 385-416. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 325-356.
Conway, Daniel W. – “Pas de deux: Habermas and Foucault in Genealogical Communication”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 60-89.
Cooke, Maeve – “A Space of One's Own – Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 1 (1999) pp. 22-53.
Cooke, Maeve – “Habermas, Feminism and the Question of Autonomy”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 178-210.
Cooke, Maeve – “Kritische Theorie und Religion”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 47, no. 5 (1999), pp. 709-734. English: “Critical Theory and Religion”, in D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.), Philosophy of Religion in the 21st Century (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2000), pp. 211-243.
Coombe, Rosemary J. & Jonathan Cohen – “The Law and Late Modern Culture: Reflections on "Between Facts and Norms" from the Perspective of Critical Cultural Legal Studies”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 1029-1055.
Cowans, Jon – “Habermas and French History: The Public Sphere and the Problem of Political Legitimacy”, French History, vol. 13, no. 2 (1999), pp. 134-160.
D'Amico, Robert – “Interpretation”, in Robert D'Amico, Contemporary Continental Philosophy (Boulder: Westview Press, 1999), pp. 151-198.
Davey, Nicholas – “Nietzsche, Habermas, and the Question of Objectivity”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 295-306.
Davey, Nicholas – “Habermas, Jürgen”, in Stuart Brown, Diané Collinson & Robert Wilkinson (eds.), One Hundred Twentieth-Century Philosophers (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 75-78.
Dean, Mitchell – “Normalising Democracy: Foucault and Habermas on Democracy and Law”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 166-194.
Delanty, Gerard – “Discourse and Democracy: Habermas's Theory of Modernity”, in Gerard Delanty, Social Theory in a Changing World. Conceptions of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999), pp. 73-99.
Delanty, Gerard – “Self, Other and World: Discourses of Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism”, Journal for Cultural Research, vol. 3, no. 3 (1999), pp. 365-375.
Dews, Peter – (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (New York: Blackwell, 1999).
|
Habermas: A Critical Reader
|
Dews, Peter – “Introduction”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 1-25.
Dillon, Michele – “The Authority of the Holy Revisited: Habermas, Religion, and Emancipatory Possibilities”, Sociological Theory, vol. 17, no. 3 (1999), pp. 290-306.
Dodd, Nigel – “The Potential of Reason: Habermas”, in Nigel Dodd, Social Theory and Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999), pp. 106-130.
Düringer, Hermann – Universale Vernunft und partikularer Glaube. Eine theologische Auswertung des Werkes von Jürgen Habermas (Leuven: Peeters, 1999).
Eckersley, Robyn – “The Discourse Ethic and the Problem of Representing Nature”. Environmental Politics, vol. 8, no. 2 (1999), pp. 24-49.
Eder, Klaus – “Societies Learn and yet the World is Hard to Change”, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 2, no. 2 (1999), pp. 195-215.
Fairfield, Paul – “Deliberative Democracy. Jürgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other” [Book review], The Review of Politics, vol. 61, no. 3 (1999), pp. 541-543.
Ferrara, Alessandro – “Democracy, Justice, and Discourse”, in Alessandro Ferrara, Justice and Judgment (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 37-68.
Feteris, Eveline T. – “Habermas' Theory of Communicative Rationality”, in Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 62-72. [2nd edition Springer Verlag, 2017: “Habermas’s Discourse Theory and the Rationality of Legal Discourse”, pp. 77-93.]
Finlayson, Gordon – “Does Hegel's Critique of Kant's Moral Theory Apply to Discourse Ethics?”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 29-52.
Forst, Rainer – “Die Rechtfertigung der Gerechtigkeit. Rawls' Politischer Liberalismus und Habermas' Diskurstheorie in der Diskussion”, in Hauke Brunkhorst & Peter Niesen (eds.), Das Recht der Republik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), pp. 105-168. Repr. in Rainer Forst, Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 127-186. English: “The Justification of Justice: Rawls's Political Liberalism and Habermas's Discourse Theory in Dialogue”, in Rainer Forst, The Right to Justification (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012, pp. 79-121. Abridged and revised version: “The Justification of Justice. Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue”, in James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 153-180.
Forst, Rainer – “Praktische Vernunft und rechtfertigende Gründe. Zur Begründung der Moral”, in Stefan Gosepath (ed.), Motive, Gründe, Zwecke. Theorien praktischer Rationalität (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1999), pp. 168-205. Repr. in Rainer Forst, Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 23-73. English: “Practical Reason and Justifying Reasons: On the Foundation of Morality”, in Rainer Forst, The Right to Justification (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), pp. 13-42.
Foster, Roger S. – “Strategies of Justice: The Project of Philosophy in Lyotard and Habermas”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 2 (1999), pp. 87-113.
Frei, Peter – “Habermas' "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns" – eine (sport)pädagogische Lesart”, in Peter Frei, Kommunikatives Handeln im Sportunterricht. Zwischen theoretischer Konzeption und empirischer Analyse (Sankt Augustin: Academia, 1999), pp. 38-77.
Freundlieb, Dieter – “The Difference between Science and Hermeneutics: Habermas's Theory of the Necessarily Normative Nature of Linguistic Interpretation”, in Márta Fehér, Olga Kiss & László Ropolyi (eds.), Hermeneutics and Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 299-306.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg – “Der Meister der Kommunikation. Die neue Rolle von Kritik und Urteilskraft nach den Weltkriegen. Ein Geburtstagsgruß an Jürgen Habermas”, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 18-06-1999.
Gardiner, Ann T. – “Games in the Salon: Jürgen Habermas on Madame de Stael”, in Roberto Simanowski, Horst Turk & Thomas Schmidt (eds.), Europa - ein Salon? Beiträge zur Internationalität des literarischen Salons (Göttingen: Wallstein, 1999), pp. 214-231.
Geulen, Christian – “Schließung muß sein. Jürgen Habermas, Die postnationale Konstellation” [Book review], Süddeutsche Zeitung, 06/07-03-1999.
Geyer, Christian – “Der Schnee-Einsiedel bleibt in seiner Höhle” [Book review; Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 02-11-1999.
Gottschalk, Niels – “Welche Diskurse braunchen wir? Zum Verhältnis von Jürgen Habermas' Diskurstheorie und einer "diskursive Technikbewertung" in organisierten Verfahren”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 237-270.
Graeser, Andreas – “Diskursethik”, in Andreas Graeser, Philosophie und Ethik (Düsseldorf: Parerga, 1999), pp. 151-175.
Greve, Jens – “Sprache, Kommunikation und Strategie in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 51, no. 2 (1999), pp. 232-259.
Gröbl-Steinbach, Evelyn – “Habermas' pragmatische Wende”, Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie, vol. 31 (1999), pp. 257-278.
Günther, Klaus – “Diskurs, Demokratie und Rechtswirklichkeit”, in Peter Siller & Bertram Keller (eds.), Rechtsphilosophische Kontroversen der Gegenwart (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999), pp. 55–60.
Hancock, Eleanor – “Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic” [Book review], Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 3 (1999), p. 480.
Harrington, Austin – “Some Problems with Gadamer's and Habermas' Dialogical Model of Sociological Understanding”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 29, no. 2 (1999), pp. 371-384.
Heider, Placidus Bernhard – Jürgen Habermas und Dieter Henrich. Neue Perspektiven auf Identität und Wirklichkeit (Freiburg: Karl Alber, 1999).
Hicks, Darrin & Lenore Langsdorf – “Proceduralist Theories of Public Deliberation: Implications for the Production of Citizens”, Argumentation, vol. 13, no. 2 (1999), pp. 139-161.
Hodge, Joanna – “Habermasian Passion and the Nietzschean Contagion”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 273-279.
Hoff, Johannes – “Die Aufgabe philosophischer Rationalitätskritik: J. Habermas und J. Derrida im Vergleich”, in Johannes Hoff, Spiritualität und Sprachverlust. Theologie nach Foucault und Derrida (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1999), pp. 34-47.
Honneth, Axel – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Dirk Kaesler (ed.), Klassiker der Soziologie II: Von Talcott Parsons bis Pierre Bourdieu (München: Beck, 1999), pp. 230-251.
Honneth, Axel – “Unser Kritiker. Jürgen Habermas wird siebzig: eine Ideenbiographie”, Die Zeit, 17-06-1999.
Horster, Detlef – Jürgen Habermas. Zur Einführung (Hamburg: Junius, 1999).
Horster, Detlef – “Die Habermas-Luhmann-Kontroverse”, Die Neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 46, no. 5 (1999), pp. 432-435.
James, Michael Rabinder – “Tribal Sovereignty and the Intercultural Public Sphere”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 5 (1999), pp. 57-86.
Jones, Richard Wyn – “Redemption: Renewing the Critical Project”, in Richard Wyn Jones, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienne, 1999), pp. 53-90.
Joppke, Christian – “Jürgen Habermas: Die postnationale Konstellation” [Book review], Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 51, no. 3 (1999), pp. 585-587.
Karydas, Dimitris & Ralf Peter Mahler – “Habermas und das Interesse an "humanitären Interventionen"”, Das Argument, no. 232 (1999) [vol. 41, no. 5], pp. 700-709.
Kaufman, Cynthia – “The Unforced Force of the More Familiar Argument. A Critique of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Rationality”, Philosophy Today, vol. 43, no. 4 (1999), pp. 348-360.
Kavoulakos, Konstantinos – “Constitutional State and Democracy. On Jürgen Habermas's "Between Facts and Norms"”, Radical Philosophy, no. 96 (1999), pp. 33-41.
Kaiser, David Aram – “The Aesthetic and Political Spheres in Contemporary Theory: Adorno and Habermas”, in David Aram Kaiser, Romanticism, Aesthetics, and Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 111-136.
Kemp, Catherine – “Habermas among the Americans: Some Reflections on the Common Law”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 961-976.
Kesting, Stefan – “Entwicklung der Machtbegriffe bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Stefan Kesting, Diskurs und Macht. Ein Beitrag zur ökonomischen Handlungstheorie (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus, 1999), pp. 113-150.
Kieserling, André – “Zwischen Soziologie und Philosophie. Jürgen Habermas zum Siebzigsten”, Soziale Systeme, vol. 5, no. 2 (1999), pp. 239-250. Expanded version: “Zwischen Soziologie und Philosophie. Über Jürgen Habermas”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse” (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 23-41, and in André Kieserling, Selbstbeschreibung und Fremdbeschreibung. Beiträge zur Soziologie des soziologischen Wissens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004), pp. 109-127.
Kim, Joohan – “Communication, Reason, and Deliberative Democracy” [Book review], Journal of Communication, vol. 49, no. 2 (1999), pp. 137-144.
Kleimann, Bernd – “Konfliktbearbeitung durch Verständigung. Überlegungen zu Begriff und Funktion des Diskurses”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 127-139.
Kluge, Alexander – “L'enragé”, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 12-06-1999. Repr. as “Der Mann der Entschiedenheit (L'enragé): Jürgen Habermas”, in Alexander Kluge, Personen und Reden (Berlin: Wagenbach, 2012), pp. 76-78.
Kneer, Georg – “Struktur und Ereignis bei Jürgen Habermas und Michel Foucault”, in Rainer Greshoff & Georg Kneer (eds.), Struktur und Ereignis in theorievergleichender Perspektive (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999), pp. 51-69.
Knell, Sebastian – “Wahrheitsanspruch und Idealisierung”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 53, no. 2 (1999), pp. 214-235.
Koczanowicz, Leszek – “The Choice of Tradition and the Tradition of Choice: Habermas' and Rorty's Interpretation of Pragmatism”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25 no. 1 (1999), pp. 55-70.
Köhler, Wolfgang R. – “Das Recht auf Menschenrechte”, in Hauke Brunkhorst, Wolfgang R. Köhler & Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), pp. 106-124.
Kohler, Georg – “Was ist Öffentlichkeit? Zur Bestimmung eines unübersichtlichen Wortfeldes”, Studia Philosophica, vol. 58 (1999), pp. 197-217.
Kompridis, Nikolas – “Heidegger's Challenge and the Future of Critical Theory”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 118-150.
Konopka, Melitta – “Die Kommunikationstheorie der Gesellschaft von Jürgen Habermas”, in Melitta Komopka, Akteure und Systeme (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999), pp. 36-50.
Krause, Skadi & Karsten Malowitz – “Zum Begriff der Gerechtigkeit in der Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas”, in Herfried Münkler & Marcus Llanque (eds.), Konzeptionen der Gerechtigkeit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999), pp. 277-306.
Lafont, Cristina – The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999).
Lalonde, Marc P. – Critical Theology and the Challenge of Jürgen Habermas. Toward a Critical Theory of Religious Insight (New York: Peter Lang, 1999).
Larmore, Charles – “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 96., no. 12 (1999), pp. 599-625. Repr. in Charles Larmore, The Autonomy of Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 139-167.
Lenk, Kurt – “Die subversive Kraft der Reflexion. Jürgen Habermas als "homo politicus"”, Die Neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 46, no. 5 (1999), pp. 415-418.
Lessnoff, Michael H. – “Jürgen Habermas: Discourse Theory and Democracy”, in Michael H. Lessnoff, Political Philosophers of the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 269-296.
Li, Kit-Man – “Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action” + “Habermas's Conceptual Distinctions and his Critique of Capitalist Modernization”, in Kit-Man Li, Western Civilization and its Problems. A Dialogue between Weber, Elias and Habermas (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), pp. 165-204 + 205-254.
Lüderssen, Klaus – “Glückwunsch: Jürgen Habermas siebzig Jahre”, Juristenzeitung, vol. 54, no. 14 (1999), pp. 718-719.
Mathews, Matthew T. – “The Persistence of Religious Meaning in the Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas”, Soundings, vol. 82, no. 3-4 (1999), pp. 383-399.
Matthies, Hildegard – “Theoretische Grundlagen der Diskurshypothese”, in Hildegard Matthies, Diskurs im Betrieb. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer konsensorientierten Gestaltung des Arbeitsverhältnisses (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1999), pp. 19-58.
Matuštík, Martin Beck – “Existence and the Communicatively Competent Self”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 3 (1999), pp. 93-120.
Maus, Ingeborg – “Habermas – Zur Rezeption von Theorie”, Blätter für deutsche und international Politik, 6/1999, pp. 727-731.
McCarthy, Thomas – “On Reconciling Cosmopolitan Unity and National Diversity”, Public Culture, vol. 11, no. 1 (1999), pp. 175-208. Repr. in Pablo de Greiff & Ciaran Cronin (eds.), Global Justice and Transnational Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002), pp. 235-274, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. III (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 283-313.
McCormick, John P. – “Three Ways of Thinking "Critically" about the Law”, American Political Science Review, vol. 93, no. 2 (1999), pp. 413-428.
Meyer, Martin F. – “Habermas' Diskursethik im Kontext einer modernen Moralbegründung”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 77-94.
Michelman, Frank I. – “Bedürfen Menschenrechte demokratischer Legitimation?”, in Hauke Brunkhorst, Wolfgang R. Köhler & Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), pp. 52-65.
Michelman, Frank I. – “Morality, Identity, and "Constitutional Patriotism"”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 1009-1028. Repr. in Ratio Juris, vol. 14, no. 3 (2001), pp. 253-271. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. II (London: Sage, 2004), pp 167-185, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. III (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 79-97.
Mouffe, Chantal – “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?”, Social Research, vol. 66, no. 3 (1999) pp. 745-758.
Murphy, Richard – “Lyotard's postmodern sublime and Habermas' "enlightenment project of modernity: modernism, mass culture and the avant-garde", in Richard Murphy, Theorizing the Avant-Garde. Modernism, Expressionism, and the Problem of Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 273-299.
Negt, Oskar – “Jürgen Habermas ist der wichtigste lebende deutsche Philosoph”, Der Tagesspiegel, 18-06-1999.
Niquet, Marcel – Nichthintergehbarkeit und Diskurs. Prolegomena zu einer Diskurstheorie des Transzendentalen (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999).
Osborne, Thomas – “Critical Spirituality: On Ethics and Politics in the Later Foucault”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 45-59.
Ott, Konrad – “Zum Verhältnis von Diskursethik und diskursive Technikfolgenabschätzung”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 271-301.
Outhwaite, William – “The Myth of Modernist Method”, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 2, no. 1 (1999), pp. 5-25.
Owen, David – “Orientation and Enlightenment: An Essay on Critique and Genealogy”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 21-44.
Pensky, Max – “Jürgen Habermas and the Antinomies of the Intellectual”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 211-237.
Pensky, Max – “Truth and Interest: On Habermas's Postscript to Nietzsche's Theory of Knowledge”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 265-272. Repr. in Babette E. Babich (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche, and Critical Theory (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2004), pp. 69-79.
Pleasants, Nigel – “Habermas and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory - a Change of Paradigm?”, in Nigel Pleasants, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory. A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 149-172.
Rasmussen, David M. – “Accommodating Republicanism”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 955-960. Repr. in Mark Evans (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to Contemporary Liberalism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2001), pp. 188-193.
Rehg, William – “Intractable Conflicts and Moral Objectivity: A Dialogical, Problem-Based Account”, Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 2 (1999), pp. 229-258. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 379-406.
Reich-Ranicki, Marcel – “Aufregungen: Reich-Ranicki über Habermas”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20-12-1999. Repr. in Thomas Anz (ed.), Die Literatur, eine Heimat. Reden über und von Marcel Reich-Ranicki (München: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2008), pp. 22-24.
Reiche, Reimut – “An die Stelle einer Triebtheorie tritt dann …. (Habermas). Aufgaben der Psychoanalyse in der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Hans-Joachim Busch & Johan August Schülein (eds.), Politische Psychologie (Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 1999), pp. 41-56. [Psychosozial. no. 75, 1999]
Reimer, A. James – “Metaphysics and Communication: The Logos-Ontology of Paul Tillich and Habermas' Theory of Communicative Practice”, in Gert Hummel & Doris Lax, Being Versus Word in Paul Tillich's Theology? (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999), pp. 194-205. Repr. as “From a Philosophy of Consciousness to a Philosophy of Language: Tillich's "Logos-Ontology" and Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action”, in A. James Reimer, Paul Tillich: Theology of Nature, Culture, and Politics (Münster: Lit, 2004), pp. 221-233.
Risse, Thomas – “International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area”, Politics & Society, vol. 27, no. 4 (1999), pp. 529-559.
Rockmore, Tom – “Habermas, Nietzsche, and Cognitive Perspective”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 281-288.
Rorty, Richard – “Intellektuelle Großzügigkeit. Jürgen Habermas zum 70. Geburtstag”, Frankfurter Rundschau, 18-06-1999.
Rosen, Michael – “Utopia in Frankfurt” [Book review; The Inclusion of the Other; A Berlin Republic], Times Literary Supplement, 08-10-1999.
Rustin, Charles – “Habermas, Discourse Ethics, and International Justice”, Alternatives, vol. 24, no. 2 (1999), pp. 167-192.
Ryan, Philip – “Discourse, Democracy (and Socialism?): Rereading of Habermas's Between Facts and Norms”, Studies in Political Economy, vol. 60, no. 1 (1999), pp. 121-138.
Schaal, Gary Stuart & David Strecker – “Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas”, in André Brodocz & Gary S. Schaal (eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1999, 1. ed.), pp. 69-93.
Schaefer, Alfred – “Jürgen Habermas: Vom sinnlichen Eindruck zum symbolischen Ausdruck” [Book review], Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, vol. 52, no. 1 (1999), pp. 11-14.
Scheuerman, William E. – “Between Radicalism and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Habermas's "Between Facts and Norms"”, in Peter Dews (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153-177. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 271-292, in René von Schomberg & Kenneth Baynes (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas “Between Facts and Norms” (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), pp. 61-85, and in William E. Scheuerman, Frankfurt School Perspectives on Globalization, Democracy, and the Law (New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 89-104.
Scheunemann, Egbert – Vom Denken der Natur. Natur und Gesellschaft bei Habermas (Hamburg: Lit, 1999). [2nd ed. 2008]
Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer – “Deliberativer Supranationalismus. Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats”, Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, vol. 6, no. 2 (1999), pp. 185-244.
Schmidt, Thomas M. – “Vernünftige Moral und kritische Gesellschaftstheorie. Zur Philosophie von Jürgen Habermas”, Forschung Frankfurt, 3/1999 (Wissenschaftsmagazin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main), pp. 44-51.
Schweppenhäuser, Gerhard – “Zur Antinomie des moralphilosophischen Universalismus”, in Heinz-Ulrich Nennen (ed.), Diskurs. Begriff und Realisierung (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1999), pp. 95-113.
Shaw, Brian J. – “Habermas and Religious Inclusion: Lessons from Kant's Moral Theology”, Political Theory, vol. 27, no. 5 (1999), pp. 634-666.
Sherman, David – “Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth”, in Leo Rauch & David Sherman, Hegel's Phenomenology of Self-consciousness. Text and Commentary (New York: State University of New York Press, 1999), pp. 205-222.
Singh, R. P. – “Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas: A Critique of Enlightenment Rationality”, Indian Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3 (1999), pp. 381-394.
Sloterdijk, Peter – “Die Kritische Theorie ist tot. Offener Brief an Thomas Assheuer und Jürgen Habermas”, Die Zeit, 09-09-1999. Repr. in ZEIT-Dokument 2/1999: “Der Streit um den Menschen”.
Spiekermann, Klaus – “Nietzsche and Critical Theory”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 225-242. Repr. in Tracy B. Strong (ed.), Friedrich Nietzsche (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 259-280.
Stojanov, Krassimir – “Personal Identity and Social Change: Toward a Post-Traditional Lifeworld”, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, vol. 6, no. 1 (1999), pp. 55-60.
Strong, Tracy B. – “A Postscript on Habermas, Nietzsche, and Politics”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 307-313. Revised and expanded version: “Habermas, Nietzsche, and the Politics of Enlightenment” in Babette E. Babich (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche, and Critical Theory (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2004), pp. 147-172.
Strydom, Piet – “The Contemporary Habermas: Towards Triple Contingency?”, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 2, no. 2 (1999), pp. 253-263.
Strydom, Piet – “Triple Contingency. The Theoretical Problem of the Public in Communication Societies”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 25, no. 2 (1999), pp. 1-25. Repr. in Piet Strydom, New Horizons of Critical Theory. Collective Learning and Triple Contingency (New Delhi: Shipra, 2009).
Swindal, James – Reflection Revisited. Jürgen Habermas's Discursive Theory of Truth (New York: Fordham University Press, 1999).
Swindal, James – “Nietzsche, Critical Theory, and a Theory of Knowledge”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 253-264.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. – “The View of Habermas from Below: Doubts about the Centrality of Law and the Legitimation Enterprise”, Denver University Law Review, vol. 76, no. 4 (1999), pp. 989-1008.
Taureck, Bernhard B. F. – “Habermas's Critique of Nietzsche's Critique of Reason”, in Babette E. Babich & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge, and Critical Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp. 289-294. Repr. in Babette E. Babich (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche, and Critical Theory (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2004), pp. 123-130.
Taylor, Charles – “Comment on Jürgen Habermas' "From Kant to Hegel and Back Again"”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 2 (1999), pp. 158-163. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 193-198.
Teo, Thomas – “Jürgen Habermas, A Berlin Republic” [Book review], Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 29, no. 4 (1999), pp. 544-548.
Thompson, Simon – “The Agony and the Ecstasy. Foucault, Habermas and the Problem of Recognition”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 195-211.
Tietz, Udo – “Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik - Gadamer versus Apel/Habermas”, in Udo Tietz, Hans-Georg Gadamer zur Einführung (Hamburg: Junius, 1999), pp. 120-140.
Tully, James – “To Think and Act Differently: Foucault's Four Reciprocal Objections to Habermas' Theory”, in Samantha Ashenden & David Owen, Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 90-142. Repr. in David Owen (ed.), Michel Foucault (New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 193-247.
Unseld, Siegfried – “Hoffnungen. Unseld über Habermas”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20-12-1999.
Villa, Dana R. – “Genealogies of the Present: Habermas versus Sennett”, in Dana R. Villa, Politics, Philosophy, Terror. Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp. 143-151.
Weinberger, Ota – “Legal Validity, Acceptance of Law, Legitimacy”, Ratio Juris, vol. 12, no. 4 (1999), pp.336-353.
Weinert, Friedel – “Habermas, Science and Modernity”, Philosophy: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, vol. 44 (1999), pp. 329-355 [= “German Philosophy Since Kant”, ed. by Anthony O'Hear (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)]
Wellmer, Albrecht – “Die Wahrheit über die Wahrheit?” [Book review], Die Zeit, 09-12-1999. Repr. in Albrecht Wellmer, Wie Worte Sinn machen. Aufsätze zur Sprachphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 208-215.
Wenzel, Uwe Justus – “Wir müssen unsere normativen Orientierungen aus uns selber schöpfen. Jürgen Habermas wird siebzig”, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 12-06-1999. Repr. in Uwe Justus Wenzel, Von Adorno bis Wittgenstein. Philosophische Profile (Basel: Schwabe, 2018), pp. 127-136.
Williams, David L. – “Dialogical Theories of Justice”, Telos, no. 114 (1999), pp. 109-132.
Williams, Howard – “Kant, Rawls, Habermas and the Metaphysics of Justice”, Kantian Review, vol. 3 (1999), pp. 1-17.
Wyn Jones, Richard – “Redemption: Renewing the Critical Project”, in Richard Wyn Jones, Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1999), pp. 53-90.
Zolo, Danilo – “A Cosmopolitan Philosophy of International Law? A Realist Approach”, Ratio Juris, vol. 12, no. 4 (1999), pp. 429-444.
2000
Allen, Amy – “Reconstruction or Deconstruction? A Reply to Johanna Meehan”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 3 (2000), pp. 53-60.
Alvesson, Mats (2000), “Critical theory: the political and ideological dimension”, in Mats Alvesson, Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Los Angeles: Sage, 2000), pp. 110-147.
Andersen, Heine – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Heine Andersen & Lars Bo Kaspersen (eds.), Classical and Modern Social Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 326-343.
Avio, Kenneth L. – “Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy”, Ratio Juris, vol. 13, no. 2 (2000), pp. 148-161.
Bartlett, Scott – “Discursive Democracy, and a Democratic Way of Life”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 367-386.
Bartlett, Scott – “Habermas and Dewey on Democracy”, Southwest Philosophy Review, vol. 17, no. 1 (2000), pp. 145-152.
Baumeister, Andrea T. – “Jürgen Habermas: Discourse in a Multicultural Society”, in Andrea T. Baumeister, Liberalism and the “Politics of Difference” (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000), pp. 75-100.
Beilharz, Peter – “On the Pragmatics of Communication, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], Contemporary Sociology, vol. 29, no. 5 (2000), pp. 758-759.
Bendersky, Joseph W. – “Schmitt, History, and Habermas: Comments on Mehring and Rasch”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 21, no. 5-6 (2000), pp. 1685-1692.
Bertland, Alexander – “Habermas and Vico on Mythical Thought”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 71-87.
Blake, Nigel – “Paralogy, Validity Claims, and the Politics of Knowledge: Habermas, Lyotard, and Higher Education”, in Pradeep Ajit Dhillon & Paul Standish (eds.), Lyotard. Just Education (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 64-82.
Blanke, Thomas – “Theorie und Praxis. Der Philosoph im Handgemenge”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 486-521.
Blaug, Ricardo – “Citizenship and Political Judgment: Between Discourse Ethics and Phronesis”, Res Publica, vol. 6, no. 2 (2000), pp. 179-198.
Bohman, James – “Demokratischer und methodologischer Pluralismus. Eine pragmatische Interpretation der kritischen Forschung”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 299-327. English: “Methodological and Political Pluralism. Democracy, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”, in Gerard Delanty & Stephen P. Turner (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 149-159.
Bohman, James – “Distorted Communication: Formal Pragmatics as a Critical Theory”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 3-20.
Bohman, James – “"When Water Chokes": Ideology, Communication, and Practical Rationality”, Constellations, vol. 7, no. 3 (2000), pp. 382-392.
Bohnen, Alfred – “Handlung, Lebenswelt und System in der soziologischen Theoriebildung: Zur Kritik der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas”, in Alfred Bohnen, Handlungsprinzipien oder Systemgesetze (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), pp. 124-145.
Bonacker, Thorsten – “Ungewißheit und Unbedingtheit. Zu den Möglichkeitsbedingungen des Normativen”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 107-143.
Bowring, Finn – “Critical Theory and the Sociology of the Subject”, in Finn Bowring, André Gorz and the Sartrean Legacy. Arguments for a Person-Centred Social Theory (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), pp. 137-159.
Brandom, Robert – “Facts, Norms, and Normative Facts: A Reply to Habermas”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 3 (2000), pp. 356-374. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. II (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 141-160, and in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 19-37.
Braun, Kathrin – “Subjekte, Klone und die Symmetrie: Die Intervention von Jürgen Habermas”, in Kathrin Braun, Menschenwürde und Biomedizin. Zum philosophischen Diskurs der Bioethik (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2000), pp. 179-195.
Brink, Bert van den – “Deliberative Democracy as a Way Out?”, in Bert van den Brink, The Tragedy of Liberalism. An Alternative Defense of a Political Tradition (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000), pp. 85-126.
Brulle, Robert J. - “Communicative Action and the Social Order”, in Robert J. Brulle, Agency, Democracy, and Nature. The U.S. Environmental Movement from a Critical Perspective (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000), pp. 15-48.
Brune, Hans Peter – “Faktizität und Geltung. Die moraltheoretischen Voraussetzungen des Rechts bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Holger Burckhart, Horst Gronke & Jens Peter Brune (eds.), Die Idee des Diskurses. Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen (Markt Schwaben: Eusl, 2000), pp. 147-170.
Burckhart, Holger – “Nichthintergehbarkeit und Unverzichtbarkeit einer diskursethischen Begründung von Moral”, in Holger Burckhart & Kersten Reich, Begründung von Moral. Diskursethik versus Konstruktivismus (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2000), pp. 1-87.
Cavallar, Georg – “"Jürgen Habermas and Manfred Riedel: Moving beyond Nationalism”, in Howard Williams, Colin Wight & Norbert Kapferer (eds.), Political Thought and German Reunification. The New German Ideology? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 177-193.
Cameron, W. S. K. – “Fallibilism, Rational Reconstruction, and the Distinction between Moral Theory and Ethical Life”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 175-193.
Chambers, Simone – “The Cultural Foundation of Public Policy: A Comment on Georgia Warnke”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 3 (2000), pp. 75-81. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 85-90.
Cheng, Chung-Ying – “Confucian Reflections on Habermasian Approaches: Moral Rationality and Inter-humanity”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 195-233.
Chevigny, Paul G. – “Law and Politics in "Between Facts and Norms"”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 309-322.
Clare, Angela – “Language and Disclosure: Habermas and the Struggle for Reason”, in Paul Corcoran & Vicki Spencer (eds.), Disclosures (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 44-68.
Cloete, Michael – “Is Habermas a Transcendental Thinker?”, South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 19, no. 2 (2000), pp. 95-117.
Cobben, P.G. – “Hegel and Habermas on Rights: A Critical Comparison of Their Basic Conceptions”, Synthesis Philosophica, vol. 15, no. 1-2 (2000), pp. 229-251.
Coles, Romand – “Of Democracy, Discourse, and Dirt Virtue. Developments in Recent Critical Theory” [Book review; The Inclusion of the Other; On the Pragmatics of Communication], Political Theory, vol. 28, no. 4 (2000), pp. 540-564.
Compton, James – “Communicative Politics and Public Journalism”, Journalism Studies, vol. 1, no. 3 (2000), pp. 449-467.
Conovan, Margeret – “Patriotism is not Enough”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 30, no. 3 (2000), pp. 413-432.
Cook, Deborah – “Critical Stratagems in Adorno and Habermas: Theories of Ideology and the Ideology of Theory”, Historical Materialism, vol. 6, no. 1 (2000), pp. pp. 67-87.
Cooke, Maeve– “Between "Objectivism" and "Contextualism": the Normative Foundations of Social Philosophy”, Critical Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000), pp. 193-227. Repr. in Dieter Freundlieb, Wayne Hudson & John Rundell (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas. Encounters and Departures (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2004), pp. 35-76.
Cooke, Maeve – “Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy”, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 5 (2000), pp. 947-969.
Cooren, Francois – “Toward Another Ideal Speech Situation. A Critique of Habermas' Reinterpretation of Speech Act Theory”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 86, no. 3 (2000), pp. 295-317.
Critchley, Simon – “Remarks on Derrida and Habermas”, Constellations, vol. 7 no. 4 (2000), pp. 455-465. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. I (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 43-53. Repr. as “Frankfurt Impromptu - Remarks on Derrida and Habermas”, in Lasse Thomassen (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 98-110.
Dallmayr, Fred R. – “Borders on Horizons - Gadamer and Habermas Revisited”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 76, no. 2 (2000), pp. 825-852.
Decreus, Freddy – “The "Oresteia", or the Myth of the Western Metropolis between Habermas and Foucault”, Grazer Beiträge, vol. 23 (2000), pp. 1-21.
Delanty, Gerard – “Habermas: From History to Discourse”, in Gerard Delanty, Modernity and Postmodernity. Knowledge, Power and the Self (London: Sage, 2000), pp. 89-100.
Derrida, Jacques – “Performative Powerlessness – A Response to Simon Critchley”, Constellations, vol. 7 no. 4 (2000), pp. 466-468. Repr. in Lasse Thomassen (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 111-114, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. I (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 55-58.
Detel, Wolfgang – “System und Lebenswelt bei Habermas”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 175-197.
Detmer, David – “Habermas and Husserl on Positivism and the Philosophy of Science, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 515-530.
Dews, Peter – “Die Entsublimierung der Vernunft als Habermas' Leitgedanke”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 144-174.
Drexler, Jane – “Response to William McBride's "Habermas and the Marxian Tradition"”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 439-444.
Doxtader, Eric W. – “Characters in the Middle of Public Life: Consensus, Dissent, and Ethos”, Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 33, no. 4 (2000), pp. 336-369.
Dryzek, John S. – “Liberal Democracy and the Critical Alternative”, in John S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 8-30.
Dussel, Enrique – “The Formal Thought of Jürgen Habermas from the Perspective of a Universal Material Ethics”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 235-255. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. II (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 239-257.
Fermandois, Eduardo – “Habermas: Sprache als Verständigung”, in Eduardo Fermandois, Sprachspiele, Sprechakte, Gespräche. Eine Untersuchung der Sprachpragmatik (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2000), pp. 173-229.
Finke, Ståle R. S. – “Habermas and Kant: Judgement and Communicative Experience”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 6 (2000), pp. 21-45.
Finlayson, James Gordon – “Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discursive Ethics”, Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 3 (2000), pp. 319-340. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. II (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 179-200.
Finlayson, James Gordon – “What are "Universalizable Interests"?”, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 4 (2000), pp. 456-469. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. II (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 201-215.
Forst, Rainer – “"Normativer Individualismus": Substantielle Grundlage einer prozeduralen Rechtfertigung des Rechts?”, in Lorenz Schulz (ed.), Verantwortung zwischen materialer und prozeduraler Zurechnung (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2000), pp. 45-54. [=Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 75]
Fleming, Marie – “Social Labor and Communicative Action”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 445-461. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 314-328.
Freeman, Samuel – “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 29, no. 4 (2000), pp. 371-418.
Freundlieb, Dieter – “Naturalismus und Realismus nach der sprachpragmatischen Wende. Habermas' Rückkehr zur theoretischen Philosophie”, Prima Philosophia, vol. 13 (2000), pp. 267-277.
Freundlieb, Dieter – “Rethinking Critical Theory: Weaknesses and New Directions”, Constellations, vol. 7, no. 1 (2000), pp. 80-99.
Freundlieb, Dieter – “Why Subjectivity Matters: Critical Theory and the Philosophy of the Subject”, Critical Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000), pp. 229-245. Repr. in Dieter Freundlieb, Wayne Hudson & John Rundell (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas. Encounters and Departures (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2004), pp. 212-232.
Fühlberg, Georg – “Exegese. Philologisches zu einem Kriegs-Aufsatz von Jürgen Habermas”, in Joachim Bruhn (ed.), Kritik der Politik. Johannes Agnoli zum 75. Geburtstag (Freiburg: Ça Ira, 2000), pp. 131-144.
Garvey, T. Gregory – “The Value of Opacity: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Habermas's Discourse Ethics”, Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 33, no. 4 (2000), pp. 370-390.
Garz, Detlef – “Kritik, Hermeneutik, Rekonstruktion. Über den Stellenwert der Methode bei Jürgen Habermas”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 201-217.
Giegel, Hans-Joachim – “Normative Orientierungen und sozialwissenschaftliche Erkenntnis. Rückblick auf "Erkenntnis und Interesse"”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 42-70.
Gillan, Garth – “Communicative Action Theory and the Possibility of Theology”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 113-122.
Gimmle, Antje – “Jürgen Habermas: Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung” [Book review], Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, vol. 53, no. 4 (2000), pp. 333-336.
Göller, Thomas – “Sprachpragmatischer Universalismus - J. Habermas”, in Thomas Göller, Kulturverstehen. Grundprobleme einer epistemologischen Theorie der Kulturalität und kulturellen Erkenntnis (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2000), pp. 176-200.
Gorner, Paul – “Habermas: Critical Theory”, in Paul Gorner, Twentieth Century German Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 159-191.
Gottschalk-Mazouz, Niels – Diskursethik. Theorien - Entwicklungen - Perspektiven (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag 2000).
Graham, Paul – “The Transcendence of a Border: How West German Intellectuals Debated Reunification”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 16, no. 4 (2000), pp. 21-44.
Grant, Colin B. – Functions and Fictions of Communication (Bern: Lang, 2000).
Grant, Colin B. – “Discursive Democracy as the Political Taming of Globalisation? On Recent Political Essays by Jürgen Habermas”, Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 8, no. 2 (2000), pp. 122-148.
Grönert, Peter – “Habermas über Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung” [Book review], Dialektik. Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie, no. 2000/1, pp. 175-180.
Gunnarsson, Logi – Making Moral Sense. Beyond Habermas and Gauthier (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Günther, Klaus – “Verantwortlichkeit in der Zivilgesellschaft”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 465-485.
Hahn, Lewis Edwin – (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000).
|
Perspectives on Habermas
|
Hammer, Espen – “Minding the World: Adorno's Critique of Idealism”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 1 (2000), pp. 71-92.
Hannen, Michael – “Marx, Habermas, and Democratic Theory”, International Studies in Philosophy, vol. 32, no. 1 (2000), pp. 99-111.
Harpes, Jean-Paul – “An End to Republican Self-Determination or a New Beginning? Comments on Some Theses by Jürgen Habermas”, in Hans Köchler (ed.), Globality versus Democracy? The Changing Nature of International Relations in the Era of Globalization (Vienna: International Progress Organization, 2000), pp. 93-106.
Harrington, Austin – “Objectivism in Hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 30, no. 4 (2000), pp. 491-507.
Harrington, Austin – “Value-Spheres or "Validity-Spheres"? Weber, Habermas and Modernity”, Max Weber Studies, vol. 1, no. 1 (2000), pp. 84-103.
Heming, Ralf – “Systemdynamiken, Lebenswelt und Zivilgesellschaft - Zeitdiagnostische Aspekte der Gesellschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas”, in Uwe Schimank & Ute Volkmann (eds.), Soziologische Gegenwartsdiagnosen I. Eine Bestandsaufnahme (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2000), pp. 57-73.
Hendley, Steven – “From Communicative Action to the Face of the Other: Levinas and Habermas on Language, Obligation, and Community (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2000).
Hennis, Wilhelm – “Eine Replik auf Jürgen Habermas”, in Wilhelm Hennis, Politikwissenschaft und politisches Denken (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), pp. 289-296.
Henry, Paget – “Habermas, Phenomenology, and Rationality: An Africana Contribution”, in Paget Henry, Caliban's Reason: Introducing Afro-Caribbean Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 167-194.
Henry, Paget – “Myth, Language, and Habermasian Rationality: Another Africana Contribution”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 89-111.
Hewitt, Marsha – “Reasons without Consolation: The Misappropriation of the Discourse Theory of Jürgen Habermas and their Implications for the Study of Religion”, in Tim Jensen & Michael Rothstein (eds.), Secular Theories on Religion (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2000, pp. 33-50.
Hickman, Larry A. – “Habermas's Unresolved Dualism: "Zweckrationalität" as "Idée Fixe"”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 501-513.
Hirschkop, Ken – “It's Too Good to Talk: Myths of Dialogue in Bakhtin and Habermas”, New Formations, vol. 41 (2000), pp. 83-93.
Honneth Axel – “Anerkennungsbeziehungen und Moral. Eine Diskussionsbemerkung zur anthropologischen Erweiterung der Diskursethik”, in Helmut Fahrenbach, Reinhard Brunner & Peter Kelbel (eds.), Anthropologie, Ethik und Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2000), pp. 101-111.
Honneth, Axel – “Jürgen Habermas. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Dirk Käsler & Ludgera Vogt (eds.), Hauptwerke der Soziologie (Stuttgart: Kröner, 2000), pp. 186-192. Repr. in Axel Honneth (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der Kritischen Theorie (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006), pp. 188-193.
Horowitz, Asher – “"How Can Anyone Be Called Guilty?" Speech, Responsibility, and the Social Relation in Habermas and Levinas”, Philosophy Today, vol. 44, no. 3 (2000), pp. 295-317. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. I (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 117-148.
Horster, Detlef – “Jürgen Habermas: Die postnationale Konstellation” [Book review], Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 3, no. 1 (2000), pp. 99-101.
Hufnagel, Erwin – “Habermas. Die Restriktion des hermeneutischen Universalitätsanspruch”, in Erwin Hufnagel, Einführung in die Hermeneutik (St. Augustin: Gardez, 2000), pp. 85-113.
Ingram, David – “Individual Freedom and Social Equality: Habermas's Democratic Revolution in the Social Contractarian Justification of Law”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 289-307. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 375-389.
Jarratt, Susan C. – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Michael G. Moran & Michelle Ballif (eds.), Twentieth-Century Rhetorics and Rhetoricians (Westport: Greenwood Press, 2000), pp. 190-201.
Johnson, James – “The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, by Jürgen Habermas” [Book review], American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no. 2 (2000), pp. 448-449.
Johnson, Pauline – “Discourse Ethics and the Normative Justification of Tolerance”, Critical Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000), pp. 281-305. Repr. in John Grumley, Paul Crittenden and Pauline Johnson (eds.), Culture and Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), pp. 243-263.
Jones, Paul – “Democratic Norms and Means of Communication: Public Sphere, Fourth Estate, Freedom of Communication”, Critical Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000), pp. 307-339.
Kavoulakos, Konstantinos – “NATO Intervention in Yugoslavia: Prelude to "Perpetual Peace"?”, Democracy & Nature: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy, vol. 6, no. 1 (2000), pp. 55-72.
Keller, Berstram – “Im Taumel der Freiheit: Demokratie und Repräsentation bei Jürgen Habermas”, Der Staat, vol. 39, no. 2 (2000), pp. 185-207.
Kellner, Douglas – “Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 259-287.
Kelly, Erin – “Habermas on Moral Justification”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 26, no. 2 (2000), pp. 223-249.
Kogge, Werner & Sibylle Kalupner – “In der Prozeduralismusfalle? - Die Fremden im modernen Verfahrensstaat”, Leviathan, vol. 28, no. 3 (2000), pp. 285-307.
Kohn, Margaret – “Language, Power, and Persuasion: Toward a Critique of Deliberative Democracy”, Constellations, vol. 7, no. 3 (2000), pp. 408-429.
Kroll, Christiane – “Jürgen Habermas und seine Reflexionen zur Französischen Revolution: Volkssouveränität als Verfahren. Ein normativer Begriff der Öffentlichkeit? ”, in Michael Weingarten, Warum Hannah Arendt? Aufklärungsversuche linker Mißverständnisse (Bonn: Pahl-Rugenstein, 2000), pp. 151-179.
Ku, Agnes S. – “Revisiting the Notion of "Public" in Habermas's Theory”, Sociological Theory, vol. 18, no. 2 (2000), pp. 216-240.
Kuiper, Koenraad – “Jürgen Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Communication” [Book review], Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 4, no. 1 (2000), pp. 150-153.
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz – “Discursive Ethics as Constitutional Theory. Neglecting the Creative Role of Economic Liberties?”, Ratio Juris, vol. 13, no. 1 (2000), pp. 95-116.
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz – “Diskursive öffentliche Vernunft versus "Community of inquirers" (J. Dewey) - Zur Auseinandersetzung mit Habermas' Rechtstheorie”, in Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Negative Freiheitsrechte und gesellschaftliche Selbstorganisation (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), pp. 137-169.
Landry, Lorraine Y. – “Beyond the “French Fries and the Frankfurter”: An Agenda for Critical Theory”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26 no. 2 (2000), pp. 99-129. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 33-61.
Langsdorf, Lenore – “The Real Conditions for the Possibility of Communicative Action”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 21-50.
Larmore, Charles – “Habermas und der Pragmatismus”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 328-343.
Latiolais, Chris – “Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory” [Book review], Ethics, vol. 110, no. 4 (2000), pp. 834-838.
Lavine, Thelma Z. – “Philosophy and the Dialectic of Modernity”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 139-156.
Leydesdorff, Loet – “Luhmann, Habermas and the Theory of Communication”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 17, no. 3 (2000), pp. 273-288.
Liesegang, Torsten – “Jürgen Habermas: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, in Torsten Liesegang, Lesegesellschaften in Baden 1780 - 1850 (Berlin: Rhombos, 2000), pp. 19-46.
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias – “Critical Theory and Religion”, in D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.), Philosophy of Religion in the 21st Century (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2000), pp. 193-210.
MacKendrick, Kenneth – “The Moral Imaginary of Discourse Ethics”, Critical Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000), pp. 247-269. Repr. in Dieter Freundlieb, Wayne Hudson & John Rundell (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas. Encounters and Departures (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2004), pp. 280-306.
MacKenzie, Iain – “Beyond the Communicative Turn in Political Philosophy”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 4 (2000), pp. 1-24.
Madison, G. B. – “Critical Theory and Hermeneutics: Some Outstanding Issues in the Debate”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 463-485.
Maffetone, Sebastiano – “Liberalism and its Critique: Is the Therapy Worse than the Disease?”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 4 (2000), pp. 1-37.
Mah, Harold – “Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians”, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 72, no. 1 (2000), pp. 153-182.
Mandel, Jon – “Habermas”, in Jon Mandle, What's Left of Liberalism? An Interpretation and Defense of Justice as Fairness (Lanham: Lexington, 2000), pp. 252-284.
Markell, Patchen – “Making Affect Safe for Democracy? On "Constitutional Patriotism"”, Political Theory, vol. 28, no. 1 (2000), pp. 38-63.
Marsh, James L. – “What's Critical about Critical Theory?”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 555-567.
Martin, Bill – “Eurocentrically Distorted Communication”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 411-421.
Martin, Michael – “Verstehen and Critical Theory”, in Michael Martin, Verstehen. The Uses of Understanding in Social Science (New Brunswick: Transaction, 2000), pp. 207-237.
Matuštík, Martin Beck – “The Critical Theorist as Witness: Habermas and the Holocaust”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 339-366.
Mauersberg, Barbara – Der lange Abschied von der Bewußtseinsphilosophie. Theorie der Subjektivität bei Habermas und Tugendhat nach dem Paradigmenwechsel zur Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2000).
McAfee, Noëlle – Habermas, Kristeva, and Citizenship (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000).
McBride, William L. – “Habermas and the Marxian Tradition”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 425-438.
McCumber, John – “Centrality as a Challenge to Ousia in Jürgen Habermas”, in John McCumber, Philosophy and Freedom. Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2000), pp. 75-90. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. I (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 401-418.
McCumber, John – “Universality, Centrality, and the Theory of Communicative Action”, in John McCumber, Philosophy and Freedom. Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2000), pp. 91-109.
McMahon, Christopher – “Discourse and Morality”, Ethics, vol. 110, no. 3 (2000), pp. 514-536.
Meehan, Johanna – “Feminism and Habermas' Discourse Ethics”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26, no. 3 (2000), pp. 39-52. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. III (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 91-103, and in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 117-129.
Mendieta, Eduardo – “Modernity's Religion: Habermas and the Linguistification of the Sacred”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 123-138.
Misak, Cheryl – “Habermas, Apel, and the Transcendental Argument”, in Cheryl Misak, Truth, Politics, Morality. Pragmatism and Deliberation (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 35-47.
Moellendorf, Darrell – “Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse Ethics”, South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 19, no. 2 (2000), pp. 65-74.
Montag, Warren – “The Pressure of the Street: Habermas's Fear of the Masses”, in Mike Hill & Warren Montag, Masses, Classes, and the Public Sphere (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 132-145.
Mori, Toru – “Die staatliche Willensbildung in der differenzierten Gesellschaft: Repräsentative Demokratie bei Hermann Heller und Jürgen Habermas”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 86, no. 2 (2000), pp. 185-206.
Moshe, Mira & Sam Lehman-Wilzig – “National versus Global Public Discourse in the Era of Multi-channelism: The Introduction of Commercial and Cable Television in Israel as an Empirical Test of Habermas' Theory”, in Christ'l De Landtsheer & Ofer Feldman (eds.), Beyond Public Speech and Symbols. Explorations in the Rhetoric of Politicians and the Media (Westport: Praeger, 2000), pp. 110-119.
Mouffe, Chantal – “For an Agonistic Model of Democracy”, in Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 80-107. Repr. in Nöel O'Sullivan (ed.), Political Theory in Transition (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 113-130, in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. III (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 51-67, and in James Martin (ed.), Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony, Radical Democracy, and the Political (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 191-206.
Müller, Jan-Werner – “Jürgen Habermas and the Debate on the Constitution: "DM Nationalism" versus "Verfassungspatriotismus"”, in Jan-Werner Müller, Another Country. German Intellectuals, Unification and National Identity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000), pp. 90-119.
Müller-Doohm, Stefan – (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000).
|
Das Interesse der Vernunft
|
Müller-Doohm, Stefan – “Kritik in kritischen Theorien oder: Wie kritisches Denken selbst zu rechtfertigen sei”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 71-106.
Murmann, Sven – “Diskurstheorie des Rechtsstaats und politischer Liberalismus. Zwei Modelle demokratischer Staatsbürgerschaft”, in Sven Murmann, Demokratische Staatsbürgerschaft im Wandel (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2000), pp. 51-92.
Neumeister, Bernd – “Habermas' Projekt der Moderne und die Kritik des poststrukturalistischen Irrationalismus”, in Bernd Neumeister, Kampf um die kritische Vernunft. Die westdeutsche Rezeption des Strukturalismus und des postmodernen Denkens (Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 2000), pp. 152-174.
Neves, Marcelo – Zwischen Themis und Leviathan. Eine schwierige Beziehung. Eine Rekonstruktion des demokratischen Rechtsstaates in Auseinandersetzung mit Luhmann und Habermas (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000).
Niquet, Marcel – “Transzendentale Moralbegründung? Bemerkungen zu einigen Problemaspekten”, in Holger Burckhart, Horst Gronke & Jens Peter Brune (eds.), Die Idee des Diskurses. Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen (Markt Schwaben: Eusl, 2000), pp. 33-42.
O'Neill, Shane – “The Politics of Inclusive Agreements: Towards a Critical Discourse Theory of Democracy”, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 3 (2000), pp. 503-521.
Oelschlaeger, Max – “Habermas in the "Wild, Wild West"”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 387-410.
Oevermann, Ulrich – “Das Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis im theoretischen Denken von Jürgen Habermas - Einheit oder kategoriale Differenz?”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 411-464.
Ott, Konrad – “Jürgen Habermas: "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns" (1981)”, in Walter Erhart (ed.), Jahrhundertbücher. Große Theorien von Freud bis Luhmann (München: Beck, 2000), pp. 383-406.
Outhwaite, William – “Jürgen Habermas”, in George Ritzer (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists, ed. by (London: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 651-669.
Outhwaite, William – “Rekonstruktion und methodologischer Dualismus”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 218-241. English: Revised version: “Reconstructive Science and Methodological Dualism in the Work of Jürgen Habermas”, Philosophical Inquiry, vol. 38, no. 1/2 (2014), pp. 2-18.
Palmer, Richard E. – “Habermas versus Gadamer? Some Remarks”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 487-500.
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde – “Die diskursive Sicherung privater und öffentlicher Autonomie (Jürgen Habermas)”, in Herlinde Pauer-Studer, Autonom leben. Reflexionen über Freiheit und Gleichheit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 185-204.
Pensky, Max – “Cosmopolitanism and the Solidarity Problem: Habermas on National and Cultural Identities”, Constellations, vol. 7, no. 1 (2000), pp. 64-79. Repr. in David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. II (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 238-253.
Pereda, Carlos – “Assertions, Truth, and Argumentation”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 51-70.
Peters, Bernard – “Normative Theorien und soziale Empirie”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 274-298.
Pfahl-Traughber, Armin – “Habermas, Jürgen: Die postnationale Konstellation” [Book review], Neue Politische Literatur, vol. 45, no. 2 (2000), pp. 313-314.
Pfordten, Dietmar von der – “Rechtsetische Rechtfertigung - material oder prozedural?”, in Lorenz Schulz (ed.), Verantwortung zwischen materialer und prozeduraler Zurechnung (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2000), pp. 17-44. [=Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 75]
Pinzani, Alessandro – Diskurs und Menschenrechte: Habermas' Theorie der Rechte im Vergleich (Hamburg: Kovaè, 2000).
Pleasants, Nigel – “Winch, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1 (2000), pp. 78-91.
Poupeau, Franck – “Reasons for Domination, Bourdieu versus Habermas”, Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2 (2000), pp. 69-87. [= Bridget Fowler (ed.), Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000)]
Rasch, William – “A Just War? Or Just a War?: Schmitt, Habermas, and the Cosmopolitan Orthodoxy”, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 21, nos. 5-6 (1999-2000), pp. 1665-1684. Repr. in William Rasch, Sovereignty and its Discontents (Abingdon: Birkbeck Law Press, 2004), pp. 49-64.
Rasmussen, Terje – “Habermas' Critical Theory of Modernity – Insights and Problems”, in Terje Rasmussen, Social Theory and Communication Technology (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 49-84.
Rasor, Paul – “Intersubjective Communication and the Self in Wieman and Habermas”, American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 3 (2000), pp. 269-287.
Rättilä, Tiina – “Deliberation as Public Use of Reason - or, What Public? Whose Reason?”, in Michael Saward (ed.), Democratic Innovation. Deliberation, Representation and Association (London, Routledge, 2000), pp. 40-52.
Reese-Schäfer, Walter – “Jürgen Habermas und die deliberative Demokratie”, in Walter Reese-Schäfer, Politische Theorie heute. Neuere Tendenzen und Entwicklungen (München: Oldenbourg, 2000), pp. 11-26.
Reich, Kersten – “Interaktionistisch-konstruktive Kritik einer universalistischen Begründung von Ethik und Moral”, in Holger Burckhart & Kersten Reich, Begründung von Moral. Diskursethik versus Konstruktivismus (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2000), pp. 88-200.
Reichelt, Helmut – “Jürgen Habermas' Reconstruction of Historical Materialism”, in Werner Bonefeld & Kosmas Psychopedis (eds.), The Politics of Change. Globalization, Ideology and Critique (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), pp. 105-145.
Remmers, Hartmut – “Ambiguität der Moderne – Ausdifferenzierung von Rationalitätsstrukturen in System und Lebenswelt: Jürgen Habermas”, in Hartmut Remmers, Pflegerisches Handeln. Wissenschafts- und Ethikdiskurse zur Konturierung der Pflegewissenschaft (Bern: Huber, 2000), pp. 37-63.
Renn, Joachim – “Jürgen Habermas, Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung” [Book review], European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 3, no. 4 (2000), pp. 485-498.
Retter, Hein – “Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Jürgen Habermas)”, in Hein Retter, Studienbuch pädagogische Kommunikation (Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2000), pp. 46-74.
Richter, Hermann – Zwischen Sitte und Sittlichkeit. Elemente der Bildungskritik und pädagogischen Handlungstheorie in Jürgen Habermas' kommunikativer Vernunfttheorie (Berlin: Logos, 2000).
Risse, Thomas – “Let's Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics”, International Organization, vol. 54, no. 1 (2000), pp. 1-39.
Rorty, Richard – “Response to Jürgen Habermas”, in Robert B. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 56-64. Repr. in Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Günther & Christian Joerges (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 69-77.
Rosati, Massimo – “Solidarity and the Sacred: Habermas's Idea of Solidarity in a Durkheimian Horizon”, Durkheimian Studies, vol. 6 (2000), pp. 93–103.
Schaal, Gary S. – “Integration qua Diskurs”, in Gary S. Schaal, Integration durch Verfassung und Verfassungsrechtsprechung (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 2000), pp. 149-173.
Schäfer, Alfred – “J. Habermas: Sozialisation als produktive Vermittlung des voneinander Unabhängigen”, in Alfred Schäfer, Vermittlung und Alterität. Zur Problematik von Sozialisationstheorien (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2000), pp. 49-77.
Scheibler, Ingrid – “The Modernist Left: Habermas's Critique of Gadamer” I + II, in Ingrid Scheibler, Gadamer between Heidegger and Habermas (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), pp. 9-70. Part I repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, vol. I (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 144-167.
Scheyli, Martin – Politische Öffentlichkeit und deliberative Demokratie nach Habermas (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2000).
Schiemann, John W. – “Meeting Halfway between Rochester and Frankfurt: Generative Salience, Focal Points, and Strategic Interaction”, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 44, no. 1 (2000), pp. 1-16.
Schlesinger, Philip & Deirdre Kevin – “Can the European Union become a Sphere of Public?”, in Erik Oddvar Eriksen & John Erik Fossum (eds.), Democracy in the European Union. Integration Through Deliberation? (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 206-229.
Schmid, Hans Bernhard – “Systemrationalität statt Vernunft. Zu Habermas-Luhmann-Kontroverse”, in Hans Bernhard Schmid, Subjekt, System, Diskurs. Edmund Husserls Begriff transzendentaler Subjektivität in sozialtheoretischen Bezügen (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 124-149.
Schmidt, Thomas E. – “Sloterdijk – Habermas”, Die Neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte, vol. 47, no. 1 (2000), pp. 92-93.
Schnebel, Eberhard – “Values in Decision-Making Processes: Systematic Structures of J. Habermas and N. Luhmann for the Appreciation of Responsibility in Leadership”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 27, nos. 1-2 (2000), pp. 79-88. [= Jacek Sójka & Johan Wempe (eds.), Business Challenging Business Ethics (Berlin: Springer, 2000).]
Schneider, Cornelia – “The Constitutional Protection of Rights in Dworkin's and Habermas' Theories of Democracy”, UCL Jurisprudence Review, 2000, pp. 101-121.
Schneider, Christian; Cordelia Stillke & Bernd Leineweber – “Jenseits des Traumas: Habermas und die Protestbewegung”, in Christian Schneider, Cordelia Stillke & Bernd Leineweber, Trauma und Kritik. Zur Generationengeschichte der Kritischen Theorie (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2000), pp. 131-150.
Schrader, Lutz – “Krieg für Menschenrechte? Der Krieg um Kosovo under der kosmopolitische Rechtspazifismus des Jürgen Habermas”, in Anita Bilek, Wilfried Graf & Helmut Kramer (eds.), Welcher Friede? Lehren aus dem Krieg um Kosovo (Münster: Agenda, 2000), pp. 31-61.
Schülein, Johann August – “Von der Kritik am "szientistischen Selbstmißverständnis" zum Verständnis psychoanalytischer Theorieprobleme. Überlegungen zur Weiterentwicklung von Habermas' Psychoanalyse-Interpretation”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 376-407.
Seeman, Bradley N. – “Peirce, Habermas and Moral Absolutes”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 12, no. 1-2 (2000), pp. 45-68.
Sim, Stuart – “The Habermas Reaction”, in Stuart Sim, Contemporary Continental Philosophy. The New Scepticism (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 189-200.
Simons, Jon – “Ideology, Imagology, and Critical Thought: The Impoverishment of Politics”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 5, no. 1 (2000), pp. 81-103. Repr. in Sunil Manghani (ed.), Images. Critical and Primary Sources, vol. I (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).
Simons, Jon – “Modernist Misapprehensions of Foucault's Aesthetics”, Cultural Values, vol. 4, no. 1 (2000), pp. 40-57.
Simpson, Lorenzo C. – “On Habermas and Difference: Critical Theory and the "Politics of Recognition"”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 323-338.
Singer, Beth J. – “Toward a Pragmatics of Artistic Utterance”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 157-171.
Smith, John H. – “Will, Power, Will to Power: Nietzsche Foucault, Habermas”, in John H. Smith, Dialectics of the Will (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2000), pp. 91-124.
Snedeker, George – “Defending the Enlightenment: Jürgen Habermas and the Theory of Communicative Reason”, Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 25, no. 3/4 (2000), pp. 239-253. Repr. in George Snedeker, The Politics of Critical Theory (Dallas: University Press of America, 2004), pp. 65-80.
Stein, Peter – “Strukturwandel oder Kommunikationsrevolution?”, in Wolfgang Bunzel & und Walter Schmitz, Umbruch der Kulturen. Die europäischen Revolutionen von 1848/49 (Saint Albin Verlag, 2000), pp. 25-53 [Internationales Jahrbuch der Bettina-von-Arnim-Gesellschaft, Bd. 11/12]
Steininger, Christian (2000), “Das Habermassche Denkgebäud”, in Christian Steininger, Zur politischen Ökonomie der Medien. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des dualen Rundfunksystems (Wien: WUV Universitätsverlag, 2000), pp. 25-45.
Steuerman, Emilia – “Habermas's Linguistic Turn” + “The Move to Ethics: Jürgen Habermas”, in Emilia Steuerman, The Bounds of Reason. Habermas, Lyotard and Melanie Klein on Rationality (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 22-36, 72-86.
Stirk, Peter M.R. – Critical Theory, Politics and Society: An Introduction (London: Bloomsbury, 2000).
Stirk, Peter M.R. – “Habermas on Theory and Political Practice”, in Mark Cowling & Paul Reynolds (eds.), Marxism, the Millennium and Beyond (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), pp. 97-115.
Stolze, Ted – “A Displaced Transition: Habermas on the Public Sphere”, in Mike Hill & Warren Montag (eds.), Masses, Classes, and the Public Sphere (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 146-157. Repr. in Ted Stolze, Becoming Marxist (Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2018), pp. 248-260.
Strecker, David – “Jürgen Habermas, Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung” [Book review], Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 41, no. 3 (2000), pp. 588-589.
Strum, Arthur – “Öffentlichkeit von der Moderne zur Postmoderne: 1960-1999”, in Peter Uwe Hohendahl et al. (eds.), Öffentlichkeit. Geschichte eines kritischen Begriffs (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2000), pp. 92-123.
Strydom, Piet – “The Theory of Discourse”, in Piet Strydom, Discourse and Knowledge. The Making of Enlightenment Sociology (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2000), pp. 34-52.
Stryker, Sean D. – “Communicative Action in History”, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 3, no. 2 (2000), pp. 215-234.
Sukale, Michael – “Jürgen Habermas und Max Weber. Eine Studie über Wert und Rationalität”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 344-375.
Taureck, Bernhard H.F. – “Ein Blick auf Nietzsches Vernunftkritik aus der Sicht von Habermas”, in Bernhard H.F. Taureck, Nietzsche und der Faschismus (Leipzig: Reclam, 2000), pp. 141-158.
Thomassen, Lasse – “From the Modern to the Post-Modern: Deconstructing Habermas”, in Johannes Angermüller, Katharina Bunzmann & Christina Rauch (eds), Hybrid Spaces. Theory, Culture, Economy (Münster: Lit, 2000), pp. 73-83.
Thomassen, Lasse – “On the Pragmatics of Communication, Jürgen Habermas; The Inclusion of the Other, Jürgen Habermas”, [Book review], Sociology, vol. 34, no. 4 (2000), pp. 821-823.
Thornhill, Chris – “Jürgen Habermas”, in Chris Thornhill, Political Theory in Modern Germany (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), pp. 130-173.
Thyen, Anke – “Über Erkenntnis und Interesse oder: Die Erneuerung der Lehre vom Faktum der reinen praktischen Vernunft”, in Stefan Müller-Doohm (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit "Erkenntnis und Interesse" (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), pp. 522-540.
Tong, Shijun – “Habermas' Theory of Modernization”, in Tong Shijun, The Dialectics of Modernization. Habermas and the Chinese Discourse of Modernization (Sydney: Wild Peoney, 2000), pp. 7-126.
Tschentscher, Axel – Prozedurale Theorien der Gerechtigkeit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000).
Wahl, Klaus – “Rationalität, Sprache, Verständigung: Habermas' Handlungstheorie des intersubjektiven Geistes”, in Klaus Wahl, Kritik der soziologischen Vernunft.Sondierungen zu einer Tiefensoziologie (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2000), pp. 110-120.
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin & Hernan Galperin – “Discourse Ethics and the Regulation of Media: The Case of the U.S. Newspaper”, Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 1 (2000), pp. 19-40.
Walkup, James – “The Cultural and Institutional Context of Habermas's View of Psychoanalysis”, Psychoanalytic Review, vol. 87, no. 3 (2000), pp. 325-353.
Warnke, Georgia – “Feminism and Democratic Deliberation”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 26 no. 3 (2000), pp. 61-74. Repr. in David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.), Habermas II, vol. IV (London: Sage, 2010), pp. 103-115.
Waschkuhn, Arno – “Öffentlichkeit, kommunikatives Handeln und deliberative Demokratie”, in Arno Waschkuhn, Kritische Theorie. Politikbegriffe und Grundprinzipien der Frankfurter Schule (München: Oldenbourg, 2000), pp. 147-192.
Wellmer, Albrecht – “Der Streit um Wahrheit. Pragmatismus ohne regulative Ideen”, in Mike Sandbothe (ed.), Die Renaissance des Pragmatismus (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2000), pp. 253-270. Revised version in Dietrich Böhler & Matthias Kettner (eds.), Reflexion und Verantwortung. Auseinandersetzungen mit Karl-Otto Apel (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003), pp. 143-170, and in Albrecht Wellmer, Wie Worte Sinn machen. Aufsätze zur Sprachphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 180-207. English: “The Debate about Truth: Pragmatism without Regulative Ideas”, Critical Horizons, vol. 4, no. 1 (2003), pp. 29-54. Repr. in William Egginton & Mike Sandbothe (eds.), The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy (State University of New York Press, 2004), pp. 93-114, and in Dieter Freundlieb, Wayne Hudson & John Rundell (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas. Encounters and Departures (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2004), pp. 181-211.
Whitworth, Andrew – “Communication with the Environment? Non-Human Nature in the Theories of Jürgen Habermas”, Politics, vol. 20 no. 3 (2000), pp. 145-151.
Wright, R. George – “Traces of Violence: Gadamer, Habermas, and the Hate Speech Problem”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 76, no 2 (2000), pp. 991-1014. Repr. in Francis J. Mootz III (ed.), Gadamer and Law (London: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 437-462.
Young, Robert – “Habermas and Education”, in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (Chicago: Open Court, 2000), pp. 531-552.